BacktoCricaddict Posted November 21, 2022 Posted November 21, 2022 4 minutes ago, Khota said: there is only one source. NYT. Meh ... not really. Their articles on food and agriculture are rubbish activism.
Khota Posted November 21, 2022 Posted November 21, 2022 22 minutes ago, BacktoCricaddict said: Or their owner is his buddy. So what? His twitter, his rules. If I hate it so much I can: (a) come up with 50 billion and buy it from him (b) quit twitter and be more productive at work. His rule part is OK as long as they follow rules of the land. Just because it is his platform, he cannot support hate speech.
Khota Posted November 21, 2022 Posted November 21, 2022 22 minutes ago, BacktoCricaddict said: Meh ... not really. Their articles on food and agriculture are rubbish activism. I can't find anything better than these guys. Read it every opportunity I get.
coffee_rules Posted November 21, 2022 Posted November 21, 2022 2 hours ago, Khota said: Don't give up. That is true that Dems claimed and rightfully so that Russians did influence the elections. But at the same time, they conceded. The big difference is Dems claim is that the voters were wrongfully influenced. Trump claims that illegal votes were cast. Big difference. You still don’t get it. It is about censorship when both say the same bs. Shows how free SM media is. Conceding is all hogwash , Trump didn’t concede, but is he still the President? After the electoral collage votes, if he still stayed in the WH, the army would have kicked him out. Dems are not as petty on the outside, but can’t rule out not talking about election fraud . Russia can’t do squat messing elections in US, Dems are just rudaalis speaking of 2016 even now
coffee_rules Posted November 21, 2022 Posted November 21, 2022 2 hours ago, Khota said: Just remember Twitter is not free speech. It is a business. They restored Trump because they want money. Nothing else. If you care about free speech and true journalism, there is only one source. NYT. NYT did I read it right? They are the most biased illiberal media ever, O have to stop talking to you. There is no journalism anymore, just opinions and narratives.
Clarke Posted November 21, 2022 Posted November 21, 2022 (edited) Those who have read word power made easy would recall egoist egotist egomaniac in ascending order. Soon there will be another similar order: reckless trump musk. It just looks absurd that this new CEO, besides the layoffs and chaos, asks developers to explain their contributions while reviewing the product stack in depth. And I thought my SVP was demanding Edited November 21, 2022 by Clarke ravishingravi 1
Khota Posted November 21, 2022 Posted November 21, 2022 3 hours ago, coffee_rules said: You still don’t get it. It is about censorship when both say the same bs. Shows how free SM media is. Conceding is all hogwash , Trump didn’t concede, but is he still the President? After the electoral collage votes, if he still stayed in the WH, the army would have kicked him out. Dems are not as petty on the outside, but can’t rule out not talking about election fraud . Russia can’t do squat messing elections in US, Dems are just rudaalis speaking of 2016 even now Facebook was used by Russians and others to help one party over the other.
Khota Posted November 21, 2022 Posted November 21, 2022 3 hours ago, coffee_rules said: NYT did I read it right? They are the most biased illiberal media ever, O have to stop talking to you. There is no journalism anymore, just opinions and narratives. It looks like a liberal bias but that happens to be progressive. NYT is it for me.
coffee_rules Posted November 21, 2022 Posted November 21, 2022 28 minutes ago, Khota said: Facebook was used by Russians and others to help one party over the other. Chinese did it 2020, it is called campaigning, lobbying and influencing
coffee_rules Posted November 21, 2022 Posted November 21, 2022 27 minutes ago, Khota said: It looks like a liberal bias but that happens to be progressive. NYT is it for me. Yes, it matches your political profile. But they are not truly balanced, they represent the left in America.
bharathh Posted November 22, 2022 Posted November 22, 2022 12 hours ago, Khota said: Just remember Twitter is not free speech. It is a business. They restored Trump because they want money. Nothing else. If you care about free speech and true journalism, there is only one source. NYT. Thank you for making me laugh today! You never fail to disappoint.
Khota Posted November 22, 2022 Posted November 22, 2022 7 hours ago, coffee_rules said: Chinese did it 2020, it is called campaigning, lobbying and influencing This is what Dems complained about.
Khota Posted November 22, 2022 Posted November 22, 2022 7 hours ago, coffee_rules said: Yes, it matches your political profile. But they are not truly balanced, they represent the left in America. Your disdain of them matches your views. You are closer to QAnon and Fox than facts.
Khota Posted November 22, 2022 Posted November 22, 2022 57 minutes ago, bharathh said: Thank you for making me laugh today! You never fail to disappoint. Right wingers don't like NYT. No surprise here. Under_Score 1
bharathh Posted November 22, 2022 Posted November 22, 2022 35 minutes ago, Khota said: Right wingers don't like NYT. No surprise here. If NYT is what you claim - everyone should like it.
Khota Posted November 22, 2022 Posted November 22, 2022 39 minutes ago, bharathh said: If NYT is what you claim - everyone should like it. Not everyone. Only objective folks. coffee_rules 1
bharathh Posted November 22, 2022 Posted November 22, 2022 12 minutes ago, Khota said: Not everyone. Only objective folks. You say ppl in the right wing would not like NYT and yet you say that it is the epitome of free speech and journalism. So only leftists according to you are worthy of journalism and are the champions of free speech? Clarke and coffee_rules 2
Khota Posted November 22, 2022 Posted November 22, 2022 13 minutes ago, bharathh said: You say ppl in the right wing would not like NYT and yet you say that it is the epitome of free speech and journalism. So only leftists according to you are worthy of journalism and are the champions of free speech? Because NYT challenges them. They don't like it and till to date deny elections. It is ok for you not to like it.
bharathh Posted November 22, 2022 Posted November 22, 2022 Just now, Khota said: Because NYT challenges them. They don't like it and till to date deny elections. It is ok for you not to like it. Whether I like it or not is not what we're discussing. You said they are the best since they are the epitome of free speech and journalism. Furthermore, you doubled down stating that they are objective. If they truly were - why would only leftists like it and not right leaning/right wing folks? An objective newspaper would not be biased ideologically. Neither left/right should be favoured. If not then what you said is false.
Khota Posted November 22, 2022 Posted November 22, 2022 26 minutes ago, bharathh said: Whether I like it or not is not what we're discussing. You said they are the best since they are the epitome of free speech and journalism. Furthermore, you doubled down stating that they are objective. If they truly were - why would only leftists like it and not right leaning/right wing folks? An objective newspaper would not be biased ideologically. Neither left/right should be favoured. If not then what you said is false. It is not biased. Right wing folks have different view of the world which NYT dispels. Under_Score 1
Recommended Posts