Jump to content

Gyanvapi mosque in Kashi - whats going on?


sandeep

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Alam_dar said:

While in my opinion, these questions have not been answered before. 


All they have are opinions brother, no scientific evidence, especially no DNA evidence. Head stuck in sand, they believe Homo sapiens originated from India and Sanskrit has been spoken for millions of years , except in IVC for some reason. If Vedic people and Sanskrit was always in India, then why is there another Script in India - Tamil and its sister languages? Where did it come from, and who are these people? 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ash said:


All they have are opinions brother, no scientific evidence, especially no DNA evidence. Head stuck in sand, they believe Homo sapiens originated from India and Sanskrit has been spoken for millions of years , except in IVC for some reason. If Vedic people and Sanskrit was always in India, then why is there another Script in India - Tamil and its sister languages? Where did it come from, and who are these people? 

 

 

Like there was no German and French in Europe 2000 BC. Languages evolve. Neither anyone saying Humanity evolved in India. According to science, we all came from Africa but by repeating this gibberish, you are digressing from the real point which was Vedas were evolved in India and not brought from outside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Alam_dar said:

 

Culture and language and religion changed every few hundred kms even in ancient Europe 4000 years ago. There was no Uniform RELIGION or Bible that existed that time in whole Europe (as Indian right-wing claims that Vedas and Vedic religion existed uniformly existed in whole of India at that time). 

On the other hand, the existence of Sanskrit only after 4000 years is itself a proof of Aryans invasion. 

There is not a single proof of Sanskrit present in whole of India before 4000 years. 

Problem is Indian right-wing never answer this question directly. 

 

Bro Rig Veda talks about a great Saraswati river that dried up around 4000 years ago which means Rig Veda existed much before Saraswati river dried up. A whole civilization was thrived around Saraswati. People have limited IVC just to Harappa and Mohanjodaro while there have 1400 sites found from Pakistan till Maharashtra all thriving during that time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Alam_dar said:

 

Wikipedia is not wrong as tons of alternative sources present about every reference. 

Please tell me exactly where Wikipedia is wrong and telling a lie according to you, and I will provide alternative references. 

 

 

It is your opinion.

While in my opinion, these questions have not been answered before. 

So keep harping and it will keep getting ignored

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

Bro Rig Veda talks about a great Saraswati river that dried up around 4000 years ago which means Rig Veda existed much before Saraswati river dried up. A whole civilization was thrived around Saraswati. People have limited IVC just to Harappa and Mohanjodaro while there have 1400 sites found from Pakistan till Maharashtra all thriving during that time. 

No he will do fresh Google search and comes back again Copy pasting the same old nonsense  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, ash said:


All they have are opinions brother, no scientific evidence, especially no DNA evidence. Head stuck in sand, they believe Homo sapiens originated from India and Sanskrit has been spoken for millions of years , except in IVC for some reason. If Vedic people and Sanskrit was always in India, then why is there another Script in India - Tamil and its sister languages? Where did it come from, and who are these people? 

 

 

Superlatives is not debate. Tell me when anybody here has said Homo sapiens came from India. Standup comedy is not factual. Very nice comedy . Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

Like there was no German and French in Europe 2000 BC. Languages evolve. Neither anyone saying Humanity evolved in India. According to science, we all came from Africa but by repeating this gibberish, you are digressing from the real point which was Vedas were evolved in India and not brought from outside.

He thinks he is doing standup material like Sharjeel Imam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

You have one DNA theory kolende, not evidence 


Everything is a theory for you Mama, if it does not support your fanatic ideas. DNA is a theory, a simple bullock cart becomes chariot and a simple human portrait becomes Lord Siva doing yoga :hysterical:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, ash said:


Everything is a theory for you Mama, if it does not support your fanatic ideas. DNA is a theory, a simple bullock cart becomes chariot and a simple human portrait becomes Lord Siva doing yoga :hysterical:

Carts were already found in artifacts. This was an advanced wheel found in Sanauli. Do keep up

 

https://swarajyamag.com/news-brief/carbon-dating-shows-ups-sanauli-had-chariot-riding-warriors-in-1900-bc-heres-what-it-means-for-aryan-invasion-theory

 

The chariots discovered have two wheels fixed on an axle that was linked by a long pole to the yoke of a pair of animals. A super structure was attached to the axle consist of a platform protected by side-screens and a high dashboard.

The wheels were found solid in nature, without any spokes, and studded with triangular pieces of copper.

According to a TOI report, carbon dating has now confirmed that the burials date back to 1900 BC, making the chariots 3,800 years old”

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

Carts were already found in artifacts. This was an advanced wheel found in Sanauli. Do keep up

 

https://swarajyamag.com/news-brief/carbon-dating-shows-ups-sanauli-had-chariot-riding-warriors-in-1900-bc-heres-what-it-means-for-aryan-invasion-theory

 

The chariots discovered have two wheels fixed on an axle that was linked by a long pole to the yoke of a pair of animals. A super structure was attached to the axle consist of a platform protected by side-screens and a high dashboard.

The wheels were found solid in nature, without any spokes, and studded with triangular pieces of copper.

According to a TOI report, carbon dating has now confirmed that the burials date back to 1900 BC, making the chariots 3,800 years old”

 

Where is the horse skeleton here mama? :phehe:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ash said:

Where is the horse skeleton here mama? :phehe:

 

These are archeological papers and findings. That’s how science works. You get a chariot remains, you infer they are driven by horses and not cows. Digging and findings for 5000 years is feet down and you need to be lucky. But the important thing is horse theory is debunked 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also mama has not explained the presence of Tamil and the Dravidian languages, how it came to India and who these people are?
 

But don’t worry mama we won’t ask you to Go back to steppe. Not yet :phehe:

Edited by ash
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if anyone hereafter says “ Go back to Pakistan “ the response should be to take the DNA sample of the person. If he has more than 20-30% R1A gene, he should be sent back to Steppe. Same logic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ash said:

I think if anyone hereafter says “ Go back to Pakistan “ the response should be to take the DNA sample of the person. If he has more than 20-30% R1A gene, he should be sent back to Steppe. Same logic. 

We should all go back to Africa by that logic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, ash said:

Also mama has not explained the presence of Tamil and the Dravidian languages, how it came to India and who these people are?
 

But don’t worry mama we won’t ask you to Go back to steppe. Not yet :phehe:

Who invented the word Dravid? There is no such thing like Dravid. It's a hoax. What's Hindus or Hindustan? People living beyond the Sindhu were called Hindus and the region hindustan. It is such a diverse region. Lot of things in these thousands of years. Europe should have been an English speaking region but it is not. They have so many languages. Where did they come from? Who are those people? If IVC people spoke Tamil, there should have been evidence for it while there isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...