Jump to content

Dispelling the last great Pakistani myth: that they have historically been a better team than India


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

 

For the last 20 + years - we have been a consistently stronger than Pak.

 

For the last 10+ years W/L ratio overall

 

Overall figures
Team Span Mat Wonhttp://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/blackArrowDown.gif Lost Tied Draw NR W/L Ave RPO Inns HS LS  
India 2011-2023 596 366 182 9 24 15 2.010 36.36 4.65 686 759 36 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
England 2011-2023 551 280 219 6 29 17 1.278 32.59 4.36 681 710 58 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
Australia 2011-2023 509 277 193 3 23 13 1.435 33.85 4.46 615 662 47 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
Pakistan 2011-2023 520 274 212 5 17 12 1.292 31.57 4.35 603 628 49 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
South Africa 2011-2023 456 251 174 2 17 12 1.442 33.22 4.50 536 637 73 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
New Zealand 2011-2023 480 247 185 9 22 17 1.335 32.60 4.57 554 715 45 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
Sri Lanka 2011-2023 553 225 280 6 25 17 0.803 28.78 4.28 653 730 43 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
West Indies 2011-2023 491 178 269 7 20 17 0.661 26.95 4.21 579 648 45 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
Bangladesh 2011-2023 401 161 217 0 12 11 0.741 27.53 4.49 462 638 43 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
Afghanistan 2011-2023 260 140 112 2 0 5 1.250 25.64 5.35 266 545 58 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
Ireland 2011-2023 282 107 155 4 0 16 0.690 24.93 5.50 280 492 38

 

 

 

Had we played Pak regularly for the last 10 years, Pak would have been beaten dead.

 

Pakistan is a minnow+ team and the difference with India will only widen as our cricketing structures and talent is far far superior to theirs

 

In SENA + India + Pakistan inter-contests since 2010 ---Pak is a minnow as the below statistic shows.

 

https://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=11;filter=advanced;opposition=1;opposition=2;opposition=3;opposition=5;opposition=6;opposition=7;orderby=win_loss_ratio;spanmax2=31+Dec+2023;spanmin2=01+Jan+2010;spanval2=span;team=1;team=2;team=3;team=5;team=6;team=7;template=results;type=team

 


 

Overall figures
Team Span Mat Won Lost Tied Draw NR W/Lhttp://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/blackArrowDown.gif Ave RPO Inns HS LS  
India 2010-2023 365 188 145 6 17 9 1.296 33.75 4.33 446 759 36 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
Australia 2010-2023 399 205 163 2 20 9 1.257 33.64 4.33 499 662 47 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
England 2010-2023 414 203 173 5 23 10 1.173 31.84 4.24 522 710 58 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
South Africa 2010-2023 317 150 143 0 16 8 1.048 32.04 4.27 384 637 79 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
New Zealand 2010-2023 310 113 161 7 20 9 0.701 29.00 4.37 368 690 45 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
Pakistan 2010-2023 311 108 182 2 12 7 0.593 27.92 4.23 370 579 49

 

 

Edited by rangeelaraja
Posted

I believe that 18-19 wins for Pak came in Sharjah during 80s.

 

I remember India dutifully showing up on Friday and getting beaten. 

Pak also had "bottle openers" and that great neutral umpire Shakoor Rana whose fingers started pointing upward as soon as the ball as much as touched an Indian batsman's body.

 

 

Posted
6 hours ago, rangeelaraja said:

 

For the last 20 + years - we have been a consistently stronger than Pak.

 

For the last 10+ years W/L ratio overall

 

Overall figures
Team Span Mat Wonhttp://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/blackArrowDown.gif Lost Tied Draw NR W/L Ave RPO Inns HS LS  
India 2011-2023 596 366 182 9 24 15 2.010 36.36 4.65 686 759 36 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
England 2011-2023 551 280 219 6 29 17 1.278 32.59 4.36 681 710 58 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
Australia 2011-2023 509 277 193 3 23 13 1.435 33.85 4.46 615 662 47 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
Pakistan 2011-2023 520 274 212 5 17 12 1.292 31.57 4.35 603 628 49 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
South Africa 2011-2023 456 251 174 2 17 12 1.442 33.22 4.50 536 637 73 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
New Zealand 2011-2023 480 247 185 9 22 17 1.335 32.60 4.57 554 715 45 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
Sri Lanka 2011-2023 553 225 280 6 25 17 0.803 28.78 4.28 653 730 43 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
West Indies 2011-2023 491 178 269 7 20 17 0.661 26.95 4.21 579 648 45 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
Bangladesh 2011-2023 401 161 217 0 12 11 0.741 27.53 4.49 462 638 43 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
Afghanistan 2011-2023 260 140 112 2 0 5 1.250 25.64 5.35 266 545 58 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
Ireland 2011-2023 282 107 155 4 0 16 0.690 24.93 5.50 280 492 38

 

 

 

Had we played Pak regularly for the last 10 years, Pak would have been beaten dead.

 

Pakistan is a minnow+ team and the difference with India will only widen as our cricketing structures and talent is far far superior to theirs

 

In SENA + India + Pakistan inter-contests since 2010 ---Pak is a minnow as the below statistic shows.

 

https://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=11;filter=advanced;opposition=1;opposition=2;opposition=3;opposition=5;opposition=6;opposition=7;orderby=win_loss_ratio;spanmax2=31+Dec+2023;spanmin2=01+Jan+2010;spanval2=span;team=1;team=2;team=3;team=5;team=6;team=7;template=results;type=team

 


 

Overall figures
Team Span Mat Won Lost Tied Draw NR W/Lhttp://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/blackArrowDown.gif Ave RPO Inns HS LS  
India 2010-2023 365 188 145 6 17 9 1.296 33.75 4.33 446 759 36 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
Australia 2010-2023 399 205 163 2 20 9 1.257 33.64 4.33 499 662 47 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
England 2010-2023 414 203 173 5 23 10 1.173 31.84 4.24 522 710 58 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
South Africa 2010-2023 317 150 143 0 16 8 1.048 32.04 4.27 384 637 79 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
New Zealand 2010-2023 310 113 161 7 20 9 0.701 29.00 4.37 368 690 45 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
Pakistan 2010-2023 311 108 182 2 12 7 0.593 27.92 4.23 370 579 49

 

 

I’ve heard this a lot.

1. India too avoided Pakistan when they were at their best. 
2. matches are won on the ground and on the day. You cannot assume. The last ODI series “aane do” series in 2012 India were favorites but lost the series anyway.  Similarly, India went as underdogs in 1992, 1996, and 1999 WC matches against Pak but still beat them. So you cannot assume outcomes. You have to beat the opponent on the ground for it to count. 
3. You may have been right from 2013-2019, Pak was middling. But right now, there is not that much of a difference when the whole Pak team is fit and in form, although on current from, India is better. 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Sharjah-Harjah said:

I’ve heard this a lot.

1. India too avoided Pakistan when they were at their best. 
2. matches are won on the ground and on the day. You cannot assume. The last ODI series “aane do” series in 2012 India were favorites but lost the series anyway.  Similarly, India went as underdogs in 1992, 1996, and 1999 WC matches against Pak but still beat them. So you cannot assume outcomes. You have to beat the opponent on the ground for it to count. 
3. You may have been right from 2013-2019, Pak was middling. But right now, there is not that much of a difference when the whole Pak team is fit and in form, although on current from, India is better. 

 

 

I cannot help it if you brain can only digest the stupidity you are fed.

 

India only avoided Sharjah in the 90s because of the match fixing mafia and underworld there.

 

India is also avoiding Pakistan like plague now ( inspite being leagues and leagues ahead of the Pak team)

 

 - because of Pak’s role as a terror sponsoring country that has almost perpetually been under FATF list.  A country that claimed to fight war on terror while hiding OBL and his ilk.  We don't want a terror sponsoring  country that has caused death of 1000s of Indians to benefit financially by playing India in a bilateral series.

 

India's avoiding Pakistan is based on principals, not how good or bad the team is.

 

You are a third rate team compared to India over the last 10-15 years and stats prove it comprehensively.

 

India has the best W/L ratio by far  in any form of the game compared to other teams over the last 10-15 years.

 

Pak is not even in the top 5 -which are ( India, Aus, Eng, RSA, NZ )

 

India has won 4 back to back test series against Australia -which includes winning 2 back to back test series in Australia.

 

When was the Pak even won a test match in Australia ?

 

Your team is so third grade that I remember Ian chappell once saying that Pak is a waste of time and should not even be invited to Australia.

 

https://tribune.com.pk/story/1288343/ian-chappell-tells-pakistan-improve-cricket-stay-home

 

The sooner you realize where you truly and honestly stand vs. India in cricket or all walks of life- the better it would be.

 

 

 

 

Edited by rangeelaraja
Posted
1 hour ago, rangeelaraja said:

 

 

I cannot help it if you brain can only digest the stupidity you are fed.

 

India only avoided Sharjah in the 90s because of the match fixing mafia and underworld there.

 

India is also avoiding Pakistan like plague now ( inspite being leagues and leagues ahead of the Pak team)

 

 - because of Pak’s role as a terror sponsoring country that has almost perpetually been under FATF list.  A country that claimed to fight war on terror while hiding OBL and his ilk.  We don't want a terror sponsoring  country that has caused death of 1000s of Indians to benefit financially by playing India in a bilateral series.

 

India's avoiding Pakistan is based on principals, not how good or bad the team is.

 

You are a third rate team compared to India over the last 10-15 years and stats prove it comprehensively.

 

India has the best W/L ratio by far  in any form of the game compared to other teams over the last 10-15 years.

 

Pak is not even in the top 5 -which are ( India, Aus, Eng, RSA, NZ )

 

India has won 4 back to back test series against Australia -which includes winning 2 back to back test series in Australia.

 

When was the Pak even won a test match in Australia ?

 

Your team is so third grade that I remember Ian chappell once saying that Pak is a waste of time and should not even be invited to Australia.

 

https://tribune.com.pk/story/1288343/ian-chappell-tells-pakistan-improve-cricket-stay-home

 

The sooner you realize where you truly and honestly stand vs. India in cricket or all walks of life- the better it would be.

 

 

 

 

This doesn’t warrant a response. Learn to write respectfully. 

Posted
15 minutes ago, Sharjah-Harjah said:

Are there normal posters on here who want to talk cricket without getting into hate and political agendas 

 

 

Thats the problem with your lot. 

 

You see political agendas in inconvenient facts and try to create facts out of your own blatant agendas.

 

Your former PM's and army chiefs have admitted that Pak abetted, supported and nurtured terror against India.

 

Your own former PM admitted to  being involved in Mumbai 26/11. 

 

Why should any country play bilateral sport with such a country ?

 

 

 

Posted
4 hours ago, Sharjah-Harjah said:

I’ve heard this a lot.

1. India too avoided Pakistan when they were at their best. 
2. matches are won on the ground and on the day. You cannot assume. The last ODI series “aane do” series in 2012 India were favorites but lost the series anyway.  Similarly, India went as underdogs in 1992, 1996, and 1999 WC matches against Pak but still beat them. So you cannot assume outcomes. You have to beat the opponent on the ground for it to count. 
3. You may have been right from 2013-2019, Pak was middling. But right now, there is not that much of a difference when the whole Pak team is fit and in form, although on current from, India is better.

The 2012 series was an aberration because we had a set of has beens close tor retirement and the conditions were overwhelmingly toss dependent. The fact is apart from fluky t20, over a series Pak are comfortably worse than India in tests and ODIs. 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Dil Dil India said:

The 2012 series was an aberration because we had a set of has beens close tor retirement and the conditions were overwhelmingly toss dependent. The fact is apart from fluky t20, over a series Pak are comfortably worse than India in tests and ODIs. 

I could say the same about 2004-2006 series. Pakistan had major retirements of Wasim, Waqar, Saqlain, and Saeed Anwar after the 2003 WC debacle. 

I think India will beat Pakistan in tests right now. ODIs could be competitive depending on form and fitness of Pakistan team. Pakistan ODI team is not as bad as what they’ve shown. A lot of key players misfiring and out of form 

Edited by Sharjah-Harjah
Posted
4 hours ago, Sharjah-Harjah said:

Are there normal posters on here who want to talk cricket without getting into hate and political agendas 

Why did Bekar Younis talked about religion & Namaz, when the discussion was on cricket ?

Posted

Flukes like the CT win aside , the gulf in class between India & Pakistan over the last 15 or so years is clearly visible. 

 

India have better batsmen , better fast bowlers , better spinners and better fielders. 

 

I can name about 20 people not playing in the Indian squad right now who would get in to the Pakistani team ahead of probably 7-8 of the regular XI

Posted

Historically H2H they have better record in test and ODI. Given we only play them once every few year ODI record isnt changing anytime soon given we havent played a test against them in over a decade that record will always stay with Pakistan. Sure once can slice or dissect data but bottom line h2h they are ahead, lets not argue about it, accept it and move on. 

 

Things however have changed this century. Past 20yrs we have been a better team by a distance. T20 a format in which Pakistan is supposed to excel and our weakest format, if not wrong we have only lost that 1 WC match. This is something Pakistani need to accept and move on. 

Posted

Never mind Pakistan but the Indian establishment was hostile to pace bowlers before the advent of Kapil Dev.

 

Kapil himself happened due to India being humiliated at Kingston by Holding and Daniel in 1976, the series defeat to Aus B team in 1977 and the thrashing the spinners took against Pak in the series in 1978.

 

I will give one example of a pace bowler with great stats in domestics who did not get even a whiff of playing for India.

 

Abdul Ismail who played for Bombay - 18.04 average with 13 5 wicket hauls and 3 10 wickets in match is not bad at all. He played great from 1969 till 1974/75 after which he lost pace and prolly interest.

FORMAT Mat Balls Runs Wkts BBI BBM Ave Econ SR 4w 5w 10w
FC 75 - 4402 244 7/26 - 18.04 - - - 13 3
Posted
53 minutes ago, Sharjah-Harjah said:

I could say the same about 2004-2006 series. Pakistan had major retirements of Wasim, Waqar, Saqlain, and Saeed Anwar after the 2003 WC debacle. 

I think India will beat Pakistan in tests right now. ODIs could be competitive depending on form and fitness of Pakistan team. Pakistan ODI team is not as bad as what they’ve shown. A lot of key players misfiring and out of form 

Not won a single game since Kuldeep debuted. And it's the same guys.

 

Babar, Imam, Fakhar, Shadab, Shaheen have been part of all those losses.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Sharjah-Harjah said:

I could say the same about 2004-2006 series. Pakistan had major retirements of Wasim, Waqar, Saqlain, and Saeed Anwar after the 2003 WC debacle. 

I think India will beat Pakistan in tests right now. ODIs could be competitive depending on form and fitness of Pakistan team. Pakistan ODI team is not as bad as what they’ve shown. A lot of key players misfiring and out of form 

FYI...Saqlain didn't retire after 2003 WC. He wZ thrown out of the team due to his poor performance. 

 

He even played 2004 Test series, where he hyped about his "Teesra" which he has created to bamboozle Indian batters...after that Sehwag's 309 happened and then Saqlain never set foot on ground to play again.

 

Btw...even India lost Srinath after 2003 WC, Zak was injured and didn't play and we had to send an inexperienced Irfan Pathan, L Balaji, Murali Karthik, Ramesh Powar type bowlers in 2004 who defeated Pakistan 3-2 in ODI's & 2-1 in Tests.

 

2005 ODI series we lost due to infighting between Dravid, Ganguly & Chappell. MSD was a newbie who was super inconsistent. Sachin was also struggling with his tennis elbow and didn't has best of days from 2004-06.

 

2006 series, we lost Test series & were trailing ODI by 0-1, then RP Singh, Sree, Agarkar took command and defeated Pakistan 4-1. Not to mention the inns by Yuvraj and then 72(46)* & 77(56)* by MSD in third and fifth ODI respectively. 

Edited by singhvivek141
Posted
22 minutes ago, singhvivek141 said:

FYI...Saqlain didn't retire after 2003 WC. He wZ thrown out of the team due to his poor performance. 

 

He even played 2004 Test series, where he hyped about his "Teesra" which he has created to bamboozle Indian batters...after that Sehwag's 309 happened and then Saqlain never set foot on ground to play again.

 

Btw...even India lost Srinath after 2003 WC, Zak was injured and didn't play and we had to send an inexperienced Irfan Pathan, L Balaji, Murali Karthik, Ramesh Powar type bowlers in 2004 who defeated Pakistan 3-2 in ODI's & 2-1 in Tests.

 

2005 ODI series we lost due to infighting between Dravid, Ganguly & Chappell. MSD was a newbie who was super inconsistent. Sachin was also struggling with his tennis elbow and didn't has best of days from 2004-06.

 

2006 series, we lost Test series & were trailing ODI by 0-1, then RP Singh, Sree, Agarkar took command and defeated Pakistan 4-1. Not to mention the inns by Yuvraj and then 72(46)* & 77(56)* by MSD in third and fifth ODI respectively. 

Plus 2007 won both ODI and test series after humiliating Pak in the World T20

Posted
On 10/28/2022 at 5:18 PM, Dil Dil India said:

The constant "we have a better record than you historically" from our neighbours(not counting trolls like BVB and "its" ilk) is not just annoying but also patently false. It is time to dispel this myth once and for all:

 

Pakistan have an 88-73 HTH edge against India across formats, This translates to a 54-46 advantage in percentage terms, i.e. Pakistan have historically won 5.4 out of every 10 matches vs India. And this is where the "superiority ends". Here is a breakdown:

 

1. Head-to-head

 

As stated above, Pak do have a slight edge across formats historically (primarily due to us barely playing any matches outside tournaments in the last 15 years or so when we have been a comfortably better side). However, India have a 13-1 (!!!) edge in WCs and 15-4 edge in ICC tournaments in general. To sum up:

 

* Pakistan have a 54% winning record vs India overall.

* in the biggest matches (i.e WCs), India have a 93% winning record vs Pakistan. This includes 3 WC knockout games => 2 of which India went on to win. This more than makes up for the slight edge that Pak have in Kitply, Coca Cola, Sharjah and Pav Bhaji cups.

* to keep our neighbours happy, let us also include Champions Trophy records => India's HTH edge in ICC tournaments is 15-4, a 79% winning record vs Pakistan.

 

2. Trophies

 

The point of cricket and sport in general is to win trophies. 

 

* World Cups => India 2, Pakistan 1 

* ICC Champions Trophy => India 2, Pakistan 1

* T20 World Cup => India 1, Pakistan 1

 

In all of the above cases, India did it well before Pakistan and are comfortably ahead. Since a lot of greenbros were shouting over rooftops about Asia Cup last month (prior to Rizzy screwing them over vs SL):

 

* Asia Cups => India 7, Pakistan 2

 

3. Test Cricket

 

Now greenbros will rightly or wrongly switch to "oh but test cricket is the best form of the game" => Ok:

 

India have won series in more countries. Pakistan couldn't even win a series in WI until fairly recently. India have held the test mace and the number 1 ranking for longer than Rizwan and Babar have been active as professional players. It is an absolute no contest.

 

 

India really missed a trick by stopping bilateral series with these plonkers; seeing Bumrah and Shami steaming in on a spicy track vs Zimbabar and UAEwan would have been hilarious.

 

BUMP:

 

4 WCs to 2

2 CTs to 1

8 Asia Cups to 2

 

 

The HTH which neighbours love to shout is a slim 88-76 adv now which is nothing against india's 17-4 HTH in ICC tournaments and 15-1 in WCs including 1 win toss win match dubai 2021 fluke.

Posted
11 hours ago, Dil Dil India said:

BUMP:

 

4 WCs to 2

2 CTs to 1

8 Asia Cups to 2

 

 

The HTH which neighbours love to shout is a slim 88-76 adv now which is nothing against india's 17-4 HTH in ICC tournaments and 15-1 in WCs including 1 win toss win match dubai 2021 fluke.

That's embarrassing for parkies lmao

 

17-4 holy ****. 

 

That is terrible. 

 

 

Posted (edited)

And no i disagree. It won't be competitive at all

 

If they played tests from 2012 to now against us. I don't believe we will even lose one game. Even if it were against misbahs pak in u.a.e.

We will still stomp them

 

It would have been a blood bath

 

Like 12 0 in 4 proper test series over the years overall. 

 

 

Edited by Kron

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...