Jump to content

Uttar Pradesh Bans Sale Of Halal-Certified Products With Immediate Effect


Recommended Posts

Posted
29 minutes ago, Khota said:

The reason for that is that there is still communication going on with the brain.

 

They make it sound like killing a animal with halal procedure is as pleasurable as having sex. 

 

Stunning is the right way to do the wrong thing.

 

 

I would not agree with you because I am against taking the life of any living creature that has emotions to fulfill one's hunger. 

 

Mother Nature has provide ample  of other options. 

 

But yes relatively and scientifically it is more "humane"

Posted
1 hour ago, Khota said:

The reason for that is that there is still communication going on with the brain.

 

They make it sound like killing a animal with halal procedure is as pleasurable as having sex. 

 

Stunning is the right way to do the wrong thing.

Jharka is also not stunning. Western stunning is they pass electricity through the brain so the animal becomes unconscious and unable to feel pain. After I hat any slaughter is fine, I guess.,

Posted
3 hours ago, coffee_rules said:

Jharka is also not stunning. Western stunning is they pass electricity through the brain so the animal becomes unconscious and unable to feel pain. After I hat any slaughter is fine, I guess.,

Meat industry in india is not organised. Chickens are still slaughtered in local markets. The biggest problem for meat industry in Northern india is That Hindu Sikh don't want slaughter house near their villages this result in slaughter houses are mainly in muslim areas means no modernization and halal.

 

Once I went to meat shop in Gurgaon with sardar managing it. And then I saw halal certification. I asked him sardar ho ke halal bech rahe. He felt embarassed and said kuchch nahi kar sakte , slaughter house sab muslims ke pass hain

Posted
4 hours ago, coffee_rules said:

Jharka is also not stunning. Western stunning is they pass electricity through the brain so the animal becomes unconscious and unable to feel pain. After I hat any slaughter is fine, I guess.,

I agree. The way they stun in west is the most humane way.

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, rangeelaraja said:

 

 

I would not agree with you because I am against taking the life of any living creature that has emotions to fulfill one's hunger. 

 

Mother Nature has provide ample  of other options. 

 

But yes relatively and scientifically it is more "humane"

You did not read my post completely. I am also against non-veg stuff but I eat it.

 

Read the last line I wrote.

6 hours ago, Khota said:

The reason for that is that there is still communication going on with the brain.

 

They make it sound like killing a animal with halal procedure is as pleasurable as having sex. 

 

Stunning is the right way to do the wrong thing.

 

Edited by Khota
Posted
5 hours ago, coffee_rules said:

Let’s not be judgemental on veg vs non-veg food options. The vegetables and grains  we eat are also dead organic matter. 

I agree that we should not judge but my own opinion is that being a vegetarian is the right thing to do. That is a opinion and nothing else.

Posted
6 hours ago, coffee_rules said:

Let’s not be judgemental on veg vs non-veg food options. The vegetables and grains  we eat are also dead organic matter. 


 

Nobody is judging - I am just stating my personal beliefs based on Jainism and Vaishnavism.  - not judging those who choose to meat.  

 

Posted

I visited the Brighton Pavilion a few years ago which was used as a hospital for Indian soldiers during WW2. The Hindu and Sikh soldiers strictly did not eat halal, today's restaurant owners are sell outs. They don't label their food halal either because they know the vast majority of Hindus and Sikhs will no longer go to their restaurant. 

Posted

Never had Halal meal except during my visits to Kashmir in the past where you mostly get Halal anyway.

Local Hindus and Kashmir Pandits to my surprise were used to eating Halal meat.

Entire state is a mystery:stupid:

Posted
12 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

Never had Halal meal except during my visits to Kashmir in the past where you mostly get Halal anyway.

Local Hindus and Kashmir Pandits to my surprise were used to eating Halal meat.

Entire state is a mystery:stupid:

Is it any different taste-wise from jhatka?

Posted
2 hours ago, coffee_rules said:


 

Has been the case for a few months now.

If you pre book a meal, you are given the following options:

  • Jain meal
  • Hindu veg meal
  • Hindu non veg meal
  • Vegan
  • Muslim meal

etc etc

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, coffee_rules said:

Is it any different taste-wise from jhatka?

In case of chicken I didn't find any difference tbh both similar.

 

But you can feel taste of blood somewhat in Jhatka version of Kashmiri Rogan Josh 

That was the one difference I found the local Kashmiri Rogan Josh served with Rumali roti was Better.

 

 

Edited by Lone Wolf
Posted
2 hours ago, Mariyam said:

Has been the case for a few months now.

If you pre book a meal, you are given the following options:

  • Jain meal
  • Hindu veg meal
  • Hindu non veg meal
  • Vegan
  • Muslim meal

etc etc

Its all fine as long as a Hindu is not forced to take non-veg halal meal.  One can decide if they want that or something else

Posted
33 minutes ago, Ranvir said:

Would a Muslim eat prashad that has had prayers said over it? 

 

That's why it is rigid and inflexible  to follow in the first place. 

It never evolved since 7 century literally.

Other faiths have over the course of time.

Posted
2 hours ago, Mariyam said:

Has been the case for a few months now.

If you pre book a meal, you are given the following options:

  • Jain meal
  • Hindu veg meal
  • Hindu non veg meal
  • Vegan
  • Muslim meal

etc etc

Most media links say this is new. I remember airline proudly proclaiming all their food is Halal-certified  a few years ago and there was a lot of backlash. 

 

https://www.siasat.com/air-india-ends-halal-meal-service-for-hindu-sikh-passengers-3129578/amp/

Posted
38 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

That's why it is rigid and inflexible  to follow in the first place. 

It never evolved since 7 century literally.

Other faiths have over the course of time.

Sikhs and Hindus 50 years ago would never eat Halal, they've gone weak now and here in the UK even serve it in their restaurants. 

×
×
  • Create New...