Vijy Posted December 30, 2024 Posted December 30, 2024 4 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: No such instructions. Rohit in his post match itnerview did not say anything about that. Even he is not stupid enough to say that given that INdia was 33/3 at onie point and added mere 79 in the next session. It is impossible even for guys like Sehwag. he and Gambhir are pretty stupid, so I would not put it past them completely
sensible-indian Posted December 30, 2024 Posted December 30, 2024 (edited) 16 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: There is no instruction. Rohit's interview has confirmed it. Besides it has never happened in history. Hunting down 200 runs in a single session. Even on day 1 it is impossible. Lol. So even plausible deniability is gone. Edited December 30, 2024 by sensible-indian
Vijy Posted December 30, 2024 Posted December 30, 2024 I think the Eng series will be the turning point for Pant. If he fails throughout that series, I would say that he has a case to be removed - but not right now. Anyone can have one poor series (even happened to SRT, Smith, etc). He does need to work on better shot selection: this is something he was good at in the past - scored at high SR via unorthodox, but judicious, shot selection
sensible-indian Posted December 30, 2024 Posted December 30, 2024 Just now, Vijy said: I think the Eng series will be the turning point for Pant. If he fails throughout that series, I would say that he has a case to be removed - but not right now. Anyone can have one poor series (even happened to SRT, Smith, etc). He does need to work on better shot selection: this is something he was good at in the past - scored at high SR via unorthodox, but judicious, shot selection There is no question of removing Pant. He is still our best test batsman. Needs to be guided tho. Lord and Vijy 2
vvvslaxman Posted December 30, 2024 Posted December 30, 2024 2 minutes ago, Vijy said: I think the Eng series will be the turning point for Pant. If he fails throughout that series, I would say that he has a case to be removed - but not right now. Anyone can have one poor series (even happened to SRT, Smith, etc). He does need to work on better shot selection: this is something he was good at in the past - scored at high SR via unorthodox, but judicious, shot selection I don't think anyone calls for his head. But his genuine lack of match awareness was shocking to say the least. He has done it before in England in the WTC final.
Vijy Posted December 30, 2024 Posted December 30, 2024 Just now, sensible-indian said: There is no question of removing Pant. He is still our best test batsman. Needs to be guided tho. Yep, I agree. He needs some proper counseling, not either getting blindly attacked or blindly supported.
Vijy Posted December 30, 2024 Posted December 30, 2024 Just now, vvvslaxman said: I don't think anyone calls for his head. But his genuine lack of match awareness was shocking to say the least. He has done it before in England in the WTC final. Yes, so it's not a new thing. He needs to mature a bit, that's pretty much it. the rest of the fundamentals are in place. he looked more solid than jaiswal in 2nd session because his defense is actually pretty good
vvvslaxman Posted December 30, 2024 Posted December 30, 2024 7 minutes ago, Vijy said: Yes, so it's not a new thing. He needs to mature a bit, that's pretty much it. the rest of the fundamentals are in place. he looked more solid than jaiswal in 2nd session because his defense is actually pretty good It looks real ugly in the current situation. I say atleast temporarily he has to factor in that he is batting with 2 of the sh***Iest batsmen in the world who contribute absolutely nothing to the same. So he has to temporarily cover for their ineptness as they don't seem to be leaving the secne Ultimate_Game and Vijy 2
Vijy Posted December 30, 2024 Posted December 30, 2024 3 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: It looks real ugly in the current situation. I say atleast temporarily he has to factor in that he is batting with 2 of the sh***Iest batsmen in the world who contribute absolutely nothing to the same. So he has to temporarily cover for their ineptness as they don't seem to be leaving the secne I think he should also bat at no. 6. it is better suited for him. let sundar come in top 5 and block somewhere
vvvslaxman Posted December 30, 2024 Posted December 30, 2024 5 minutes ago, Vijy said: I think he should also bat at no. 6. it is better suited for him. let sundar come in top 5 and block somewhere Sundar has to spit on the face of Rohit. I mean he gives his first over when the ball is 50 overs old. Then he hardly used him. Then he sends him to bat at no.9, no.10. It is as if he didn't want Sundar in the team.
Vijy Posted December 30, 2024 Posted December 30, 2024 Just now, vvvslaxman said: Sundar has to spit on the face of Rohit. I mean he gives his first over when the ball is 50 overs old. Then he hardly used him. Then he sends him to bat at no.9, no.10. It is as if he didn't want Sundar in the team. think rohit may appreciate it
gattaca Posted December 30, 2024 Posted December 30, 2024 9 hours ago, New guy said: Will lying losers like @Frustratedor others ever admit this? It was obvious he was given instructions as his attitude changed after tea. @gattaca for your reference Where is this mentioned any source ? Not even in the post game presser Rohit mentioned that. He mentioned Pant should choose the way to play and he can’t tell to curb his instincts.
lemsip Posted December 30, 2024 Posted December 30, 2024 38 minutes ago, Vijy said: Yep, I agree. He needs some proper counseling, not either getting blindly attacked or blindly supported. He needs to be given role clarity. What is his function in the team ? Is he a primarily a keeper who will be sometimes called upon to play an attacking innings to pummel the opposition ( a la Gilly) or is he primarily a top order batsman who is an integral part of constructing a team total ? He cannot realistically do both roles. Unfortunately the captain , coach and other senior batters have no credibility to be able to provide this clarity and guide him accordingly. Andd it's not just Pant. Others like Gill, KL, Sarfaraz, Jurel, Akashdeep, Harsht etc also need to be given clarity about their roles in the test side. There is currently too much random shuffling for no logical reason in the setup. Lord 1
Vijy Posted December 30, 2024 Posted December 30, 2024 8 minutes ago, lemsip said: He needs to be given role clarity. What is his function in the team ? Is he a primarily a keeper who will be sometimes called upon to play an attacking innings to pummel the opposition ( a la Gilly) or is he primarily a top order batsman who is an integral part of constructing a team total ? He cannot realistically do both roles. Unfortunately the captain , coach and other senior batters have no credibility to be able to provide this clarity and guide him accordingly. Andd it's not just Pant. Others like Gill, KL, Sarfaraz, Jurel, Akashdeep, Harsht etc also need to be given clarity about their roles in the test side. There is currently too much random shuffling for no logical reason in the setup. yes, role clarity + stable batting/bowling position is important for all players. they should be flexible, of course, but they need a predetermined role. this lack of role clarity is affecting not just Pant, but also KL, Sundar, NKR to name three. lemsip 1
Ultimate_Game Posted December 30, 2024 Posted December 30, 2024 16 minutes ago, Vijy said: yes, role clarity + stable batting/bowling position is important for all players. they should be flexible, of course, but they need a predetermined role. this lack of role clarity is affecting not just Pant, but also KL, Sundar, NKR to name three. Essentially the whole team is bending over backwards to fit in the two non-performers.
Lord Posted December 30, 2024 Posted December 30, 2024 1 hour ago, vvvslaxman said: No such instructions. Rohit in his post match itnerview did not say anything about that. Even he is not stupid enough to say that given that INdia was 33/3 at onie point and added mere 79 in the next session. It is impossible even for guys like Sehwag. Nah he definitely said they were going for the total. Whether those instructions were still there on tea is unclear. I think they were
vvvslaxman Posted December 30, 2024 Posted December 30, 2024 11 minutes ago, Lord said: Nah he definitely said they were going for the total. Whether those instructions were still there on tea is unclear. I think they were Either he is lying or covering for Pant's shot. He knew there will be backlash. There is no way in hell they batted post lunch like they had that in mind. Pant doesn't bat like that.
Lord Posted December 30, 2024 Posted December 30, 2024 Just now, vvvslaxman said: Either he is lying or covering for Pant's shot. He knew there will be backlash. There is no way in hell they batted post lunch like they had that in mind. Pant doesn't bat like that. maybe the plan was to bat safely in 2nd session and go for it after tea
vvvslaxman Posted December 30, 2024 Posted December 30, 2024 1 minute ago, Lord said: maybe the plan was to bat safely in 2nd session and go for it after tea NOt possible 200 in a single session with a weak lower order. On a large ground like MCG it is literally impossible with all the feilders on the boundary.
Lord Posted December 30, 2024 Posted December 30, 2024 Just now, vvvslaxman said: NOt possible 200 in a single session with a weak lower order. On a large ground like MCG it is literally impossible with all the feilders on the boundary. that's what we think.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now