Indian Dominates Wisden Awards

[vvvslaxman]

[vvvslaxman]

 

[Suhaan]

2 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

Mitchell Sadeja

[vvvslaxman]

7 minutes ago, Suhaan said:

Mitchell Sadeja

hahaha lol Noticed that. TOo lazy to correct it

[lemsip]

Not that surprising. These awards are mainly given based on the English cricket season and India played a full 5 test series in England in the summer.

[Gollum]

1 hour ago, lemsip said:

Not that surprising. These awards are mainly given based on the English cricket season and India played a full 5 test series in England in the summer.

Also you can get that award/honour only once in your career. Making Root, Brook, Duckett etc. ineligible to win it despite scoring lots of runs in that series. 

Edited April 15 by Gollum

[BacktoCricaddict]

6 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

hahaha lol Noticed that. TOo lazy to correct it

Also saying Jadeja scored 754 runs. What is your AI smoking?

[Tillu]

Whats the point of giving all these awards while also calling BCCI Orwellian and an extension of the Indian government.

[Tillu]

India cricket slammed for ‘Orwellian’ control of global game by Wisden

UK-based Wisden Cricketers’ Almanack takes a dim view of an unhealthy and politicised Indian dominance of the global game.
Wisden has criticised what it calls Indian political interference in global cricket administration, labelling the current situation “increasingly Orwellian”.

The United Kingdom-based Wisden Cricketers’ Almanack, which dates back to 1864, is an annual record of all major cricket worldwide and is regarded as the sport’s “bible”.

In its 163rd annual edition, to be published on Thursday, editor Lawrence Booth highlighted what he sees as an unhealthy and politicised Indian dominance of the global game.

The International Cricket Council (ICC) has an Indian chief executive, Sanjog Gupta, and an Indian chairman, Jay Shah, who is the son of Amit Shah, India’s minister of home affairs and a longstanding ally of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Wisden described the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), which Shah led before taking over at the ICC, as “the sporting adjunct of India’s ruling BJP (Bharatiya Janata Party)”.

Booth also highlighted how politics intruded upon the 2025 Asia Cup, which took place against a backdrop of a brief war between India and Pakistan, leading to their players refusing to shake hands when the rivals played each other.

“Was there a clearer indictment of the game’s governance in 2025 than Pakistan Cricket Board chairman Mohsin Naqvi’s assertion that ‘politics and sport can’t go together’?” Booth wrote. “Presumably he had forgotten he was also his country’s interior minister.”

Booth added: “It was obvious long before this latest grandstanding that the BCCI were the sporting adjunct of India’s ruling BJP.

“But the relationship became explicit when India captain Suryakumar Yadav dedicated the first of India’s Asia Cup wins over Pakistan to the armed forces.

“And the idea that cricket was now a legitimate proxy for more lethal activity was hammered home on X by India’s prime minister, Narendra Modi, after his country beat Pakistan in the final: ‘Operation Sindoor on the games field. Outcome is the same – India wins!’ The real-world Operation Sindoor had left dozens dead, on both sides of the border.”

Booth also cited the case of Bangladesh fast bowler Mustafizur Rahman, who was released from a $1m deal with the Indian Premier League (IPL) franchise Kolkata Knight Riders amid rising tensions between the two nations after the killing of Hindu men in Bangladesh.

Mustafizur’s exit from the IPL sparked a chain of events that led to Bangladesh’s removal from this year’s men’s T20 World Cup after their government refused to let them travel to India.

“The sport’s governance grows ever more Orwellian, pretending that Indian exceptionalism comes without consequence, and blaming those lower down the food chain for lashing out,” Booth wrote.

“Predictably, almost no prominent voices in the Indian game addressed the root cause of the carnage: the politicisation of a sport that, whatever Naqvi may say, has never been untouched by the real world, yet never more poisoned by it either.”

[putrevus]

5 hours ago, Tillu said:

India cricket slammed for ‘Orwellian’ control of global game by Wisden

UK-based Wisden Cricketers’ Almanack takes a dim view of an unhealthy and politicised Indian dominance of the global game.
Wisden has criticised what it calls Indian political interference in global cricket administration, labelling the current situation “increasingly Orwellian”.

The United Kingdom-based Wisden Cricketers’ Almanack, which dates back to 1864, is an annual record of all major cricket worldwide and is regarded as the sport’s “bible”.

In its 163rd annual edition, to be published on Thursday, editor Lawrence Booth highlighted what he sees as an unhealthy and politicised Indian dominance of the global game.

The International Cricket Council (ICC) has an Indian chief executive, Sanjog Gupta, and an Indian chairman, Jay Shah, who is the son of Amit Shah, India’s minister of home affairs and a longstanding ally of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Wisden described the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), which Shah led before taking over at the ICC, as “the sporting adjunct of India’s ruling BJP (Bharatiya Janata Party)”.

Booth also highlighted how politics intruded upon the 2025 Asia Cup, which took place against a backdrop of a brief war between India and Pakistan, leading to their players refusing to shake hands when the rivals played each other.

“Was there a clearer indictment of the game’s governance in 2025 than Pakistan Cricket Board chairman Mohsin Naqvi’s assertion that ‘politics and sport can’t go together’?” Booth wrote. “Presumably he had forgotten he was also his country’s interior minister.”

Booth added: “It was obvious long before this latest grandstanding that the BCCI were the sporting adjunct of India’s ruling BJP.

“But the relationship became explicit when India captain Suryakumar Yadav dedicated the first of India’s Asia Cup wins over Pakistan to the armed forces.

“And the idea that cricket was now a legitimate proxy for more lethal activity was hammered home on X by India’s prime minister, Narendra Modi, after his country beat Pakistan in the final: ‘Operation Sindoor on the games field. Outcome is the same – India wins!’ The real-world Operation Sindoor had left dozens dead, on both sides of the border.”

Booth also cited the case of Bangladesh fast bowler Mustafizur Rahman, who was released from a $1m deal with the Indian Premier League (IPL) franchise Kolkata Knight Riders amid rising tensions between the two nations after the killing of Hindu men in Bangladesh.

Mustafizur’s exit from the IPL sparked a chain of events that led to Bangladesh’s removal from this year’s men’s T20 World Cup after their government refused to let them travel to India.

“The sport’s governance grows ever more Orwellian, pretending that Indian exceptionalism comes without consequence, and blaming those lower down the food chain for lashing out,” Booth wrote.

“Predictably, almost no prominent voices in the Indian game addressed the root cause of the carnage: the politicisation of a sport that, whatever Naqvi may say, has never been untouched by the real world, yet never more poisoned by it either.”

Whats new,these bastar**ds are complaining again about BCCI and India, Booth now, Berry before had one agenda,  whine about BCCI and India.

 

Was the game in better hands when England and Australia were incharge. 

Edited April 15 by putrevus

[Throwaib_Chuckter]

On 4/16/2026 at 4:45 AM, putrevus said:

Whats new,these bastar**ds are complaining again about BCCI and India, Booth now, Berry before had one agenda,  whine about BCCI and India.

 

Was the game in better hands when England and Australia were incharge. 

Nothing like a Whinging Pom to brighten up the day with their tears.