champ Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 sachin itself is not bothered about these things .. u guys are pissed .. go get a life seriously .. Link to comment
hari504504 Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 I don't think Sachin cared that much' date=' he didn't really make a proper effort to get to that 100. Also he could have easily told Karthik to take it easy[/quote'] I would have no respect for anyone who did that... and frankly I think tendu is bigger than that! Link to comment
Sachinism Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 I would have no respect for anyone who did that... and frankly I think tendu is bigger than that! I'm saying if he wanted the 100 he would have done that, but he wasn't bothered Link to comment
achilles Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 We should feel happy in a way because this was the FIRST time Sachin remained Not Out in the 90s among 17 past attempts. Google/Statsguru for it. Link to comment
champ Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 and here is the opinion of our senior cricketers reg this episode .. dont they have any work to do other than this nonsense .. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/cricket/series-tournaments/sri-lanka-in-india-2009/top-stories/Karthik-should-have-allowed-Tendulkar-to-complete-ton-Former-players/articleshow/5366336.cms Link to comment
akshayxyz Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 Any one who understands ethics - would agree that it would have been unethical for Karthik to 'consciously' work towards some individual's (his or Sachin's) personal milestone. Team's objective takes priority over anything and that is winning the match. In fact, had he done so - we would have been debating on - "was it right for Karthik to allow Sachin for another century". And trust me that would have received harsher response. When we have such contradicting situations (different paths to take), the one which is more aligned with Value system and ethics should take precedence. Besides, as others mentioned - Sachin had all the time (and skills and form) to get what he wanted. He could have easily manipulated the strike and we would have been after his skin for doing so (I would have led the effort ;) ). Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 and here is the opinion of our senior cricketers reg this episode .. dont they have any work to do other than this nonsense .. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/cricket/series-tournaments/sri-lanka-in-india-2009/top-stories/Karthik-should-have-allowed-Tendulkar-to-complete-ton-Former-players/articleshow/5366336.cms Unbelievable quotes from former players. Why is it even a discussion after the primary objective was achieved. When Dravid was stranded on 91 in 114 balls in Sydney Test , declaration was made. Nobody made a fuss about that. Why now? Link to comment
akshayxyz Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 btw - all these former players' comments reflect their mediocre mentality. they have lost it completely. Link to comment
Sachinism Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 Shameful comments from former players. Goes to show their mentality and what was more important for them Link to comment
achilles Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 Unbelievable quotes from former players. Why is it even a discussion after the primary objective was achieved. When Dravid was stranded on 91 in 114 balls in Sydney Test ' date=' declaration was made. Nobody made a fuss about that. Why now?[/quote'] Agreed Link to comment
akshayxyz Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 It gives sense of superiority to know such people exist and keep giving evidences of their existence. On the other hand, at times, I feel insecure at the thought whether 'we' (the superior ones) are in minority ;). After all, it is all relative. Link to comment
retterimp Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 ^ His lighter tone has hurted me and millions of Sachin Fan' date=' it means in our language doubting the skills and calibre of GOD whom we worship.I ll not take that now [/quote'] LOL Link to comment
retterimp Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 Easy there cowboy, am sure retter meant it in a lighter vein. We all love SRT, so chill and hopefully he'll score a double next ODI - Karthik or no Karthik! :yay: thanks. man these worshippers, please gaaurav420, please dont do jihad on me Link to comment
DomainK Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 Unbelievable quotes from former players. Why is it even a discussion after the primary objective was achieved. When Dravid was stranded on 91 in 114 balls in Sydney Test ' date=' declaration was made. Nobody made a fuss about that. Why now?[/quote'] Correct. Poor Karthik is being attacked for no reason. I can understand it coming from some fans, but ex-players need to behave. Link to comment
champ Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 bcos of some of these senior cricketers , we fans have to hang head in shame at the crappy records and performances of 70s and 90s .. clearly they would have taken personal milestones than victories .. no wonder our past records suck .. Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 For all those who said Sachin was interested in 100. Listen carefully at 1:22 . "Play normal play normal" - Sachin. Six was hit only after that . [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0PeMT0QG3g&feature=player_embedded]YouTube- indsl3-7[/ame] Link to comment
coffee_rules Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 ^ thanks for posting. Link to comment
Sooda Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 That was a smashing six, and the way the commies reacted. Sunny for one. :headshake: ..taking a chance' apparently I love the way all the so called 'ex players' in that article are a whos who of nobodys (relatively anyway). Nadkarni, Baig, Chauhan? who cares what you guys think save Gavaskar :D Link to comment
Ram Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 On the flip-side, I think Karthik slowed down (or even otherwise) and Sach gotten his 100, there would have been a bigger controversy. People would have been up in arms pointing how he is playing for stats and 100s. Either way, this situation was tailor-made to be controversial. Ultimately, I think Sach came out of it relatively unscathed. Link to comment
goose Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 as a fan of Indian cricket i find it deplorable that i and others like me should be made to feel guilty for feeling a little disappointed at one of our players just missing out on a landmark. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now