achilles Posted February 22, 2010 Posted February 22, 2010 We should outsource assassinations of Dawood and the top brass of LeT, JuD etc. to Mossad. It's not going to cost more than a few million dollars and will play a big part in reducing terror threats in India. RAW is the most inept spy agency from the top countries and it's a given that they are not going to improve, so might as well use some money power and outsource contracts. If someone like Dawood had done anything against Israel that he did against India he would have been dead years back. There are a lot of things I dislike about Israel, but one can have nothing but admiration for the manner in which Mossad operates. 1. RAW is the most secretive intelligence organisation in the world. All the other organisations are widely reported, spoken of, speculated about. RAW operates in complete anonymity, which is the primary thing you expect from an intelligence agency. 2. Mossad is good, but it is no RAW. RAW rocks. The only thing is, they are low key, don't "leak" in the median, go about their business secretly and tie ends in such a way, that no one sees their hand in anything, even though they must've executed the plan. I like RAW. It has drawbacks but it is the best intelligence agency in South Asia :isalute:
zubinpepsi Posted February 22, 2010 Posted February 22, 2010 1. RAW is the most secretive intelligence organisation in the world. All the other organisations are widely reported, spoken of, speculated about. RAW operates in complete anonymity, which is the primary thing you expect from an intelligence agency. there is a reason for that... maybe cuz they aint doing anything.. :cantstop:
flamy Posted February 22, 2010 Posted February 22, 2010 Vav. Flamy eej cracks good joke all the time :hysterical::hysterical: thanks, but it was p_k (of "pk pwned :D" fame)
Guest Gunner Posted February 22, 2010 Posted February 22, 2010 there is a reason for that... maybe cuz they aint doing anything.. :cantstop: :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
veer Posted February 22, 2010 Posted February 22, 2010 wow.. didnt world war one started like this? A duke got killed in some other country ...
ViruRulez Posted February 22, 2010 Posted February 22, 2010 wow.. didnt world war one started like this? A duke got killed in some other country ... the world is going to end in 2012
Equinox Posted February 22, 2010 Posted February 22, 2010 I do not support India sending hit squads into countries like in the Gulf which will unnecessarily sour our relations. Right now India is getting some sort of cooperation from countries like Oman etc. On the other hand, we should definitely try something out like this in pakistan (maybe Nepal and Bangladesh as well). I think India had some sort of covert operation going on in pakistan till 1997 when Gujral wound it up. Hopefully it has since been restored atleast to some extent. It is a known fact that the Chhota Rajan gang has been (ab)used by the RAW to bump off several D gang members. One was done in recently in Nepal. Btw I dont believe the Dawood and Thakeray link because the latter was on top of D-gang hitlist for quite some time. I have heard more about Pawar being linked to Thakeray. Also, I dont want any party to put covert operations into their manifesto. These things shouldnt be made explicitly or even quasi-officially public otherwise the whole point is lost. India doesn't have the balls to do this. One phone call from Obama and you will be *****ing yourselves. I suggest you go back to your desk. The taxes aren't going to do themselves uncle...
seedhi Posted February 23, 2010 Author Posted February 23, 2010 India doesn't have the balls to do this. One phone call from Obama and you will be *****ing yourselves. I suggest you go back to your desk. The taxes aren't going to do themselves uncle...Well right now your govt is willingly handing over wanted terrorists to India so I guess there is no need of it at this point. I think the Bangladeshi govt has finally realized that harboring anti-India elements will prove costly from them in the long run, just like it is proving for pakistan.
Equinox Posted February 23, 2010 Posted February 23, 2010 Well right now your govt is willingly handing over wanted terrorists to India so I guess there is no need of it at this point. I think the Bangladeshi govt has finally realized that harboring anti-India elements will prove costly from them in the long run' date=' just like it is proving for pakistan.[/quote'] No one finally realised anything. Hasina and Awami League have always been against anti-India activities. And before sending agents to Bangladesh use them to clear the traitors from your own country. We are more than capable of controlling terror in our territory and we don't point fingers at others. Bottom line is if you had the balls to do something you would have done it. You couldn't do anything when Khaleda Zia was in power and BDR was battering BSF in the borders. You think it is easy to come into an over-crowded country assassinate someone and leave? If Zia was in power she would have them catched and burnt alive. You are lucky that she is not at the helm and it's Hasina so you can continue to distort us for the next five years.
The Outsider Posted February 23, 2010 Posted February 23, 2010 ^ Hang on, so you are saying that it is a bad thing that Hasina is not allowing Bangladesh soil to be used for terrorism and preventing terrorism is distorting your existence? And you are looking back proudly at the days when your country was being used as an instrument to kill innocents and are looking forward to the return of those days?
EnterTheVoid Posted February 23, 2010 Posted February 23, 2010 2. Mossad is good' date=' but it is no RAW.[/quote'] ****** Mossad is not as good as RAW, eh ? Back this up. If you can.
seedhi Posted February 23, 2010 Author Posted February 23, 2010 No one finally realised anything. Hasina and Awami League have always been against anti-India activities. And before sending agents to Bangladesh use them to clear the traitors from your own country. We are more than capable of controlling terror in our territory and we don't point fingers at others. Bottom line is if you had the balls to do something you would have done it. You couldn't do anything when Khaleda Zia was in power and BDR was battering BSF in the borders. You think it is easy to come into an over-crowded country assassinate someone and leave? If Zia was in power she would have them catched and burnt alive. You are lucky that she is not at the helm and it's Hasina so you can continue to distort us for the next five years.BDR was helping smugglers, infiltrators and terrorists for a long time, even during the earlier tenure of Hasina. But then the BDR did their infamous mutiny and slaughtered their own officers and raped and murdered their wives as well. If I am not mistaken, their bodies were dumped into several pits. I think this incident opened the eyes to the radical elements inside the establishment and strengthened the hands of Hasina to cooperate with India, which is good for Bangladesh as well. Look at pakistan - they harbored all kinds of jehadi militants who have now turned on it and made it a failed state. Anyway, right now since your Hasina is practically eating out of our hands we need not use any covert tactics.
Texy Posted February 23, 2010 Posted February 23, 2010 No one finally realised anything. Hasina and Awami League have always been against anti-India activities. And before sending agents to Bangladesh use them to clear the traitors from your own country. We are more than capable of controlling terror in our territory and we don't point fingers at others. Bottom line is if you had the balls to do something you would have done it. You couldn't do anything when Khaleda Zia was in power and BDR was battering BSF in the borders. You think it is easy to come into an over-crowded country assassinate someone and leave? If Zia was in power she would have them catched and burnt alive. You are lucky that she is not at the helm and it's Hasina so you can continue to distort us for the next five years. you're lucky that Zia the traitor is not in power or else Bangladesh right now would've been another pakistan with extremism fanning the mass during Zia period...hindus were living in fear in Bangladesh..at least now under awami league they are safe BDR is a joke.... if India really flexes their military muscle...BDR will piss their pants
Texy Posted February 23, 2010 Posted February 23, 2010 Bottomline: ISRAEL has the balls to do this...India doesn't.....since the majority party is too busy catering the minority traitors With the whole muslim world hating jews and Israel...why was Al Qaeda unable to do anything in ISRAEL? ans: MOSSAD
Gambit Posted February 23, 2010 Posted February 23, 2010 Just to slightly temper the Israeli love here, Israel have in the past agreed to release terrorists for their captured soldiers. So the myth that Israel doesn't negotiate with terrorists is actually that i.e. a myth. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/2420843/Israel-and-Hizbollah-complete-controversial-prisoner-exchange.html http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEZMBwuOA8j8&pos=9
Guest DeveGowda Posted February 23, 2010 Posted February 23, 2010 Just to slightly temper the Israeli love here, Israel have in the past agreed to release terrorists for their captured soldiers. So the myth that Israel doesn't negotiate with terrorists is actually that i.e. a myth. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/2420843/Israel-and-Hizbollah-complete-controversial-prisoner-exchange.html http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEZMBwuOA8j8&pos=9 But you have to give to Israeal , even for a small country surrounded with enemies and STill alive and kicking....:hatsoff:
yoda Posted February 23, 2010 Posted February 23, 2010 Bottomline: ISRAEL has the balls to do this...India doesn't.....since the majority party is too busy catering the minority traitors With the whole muslim world hating jews and Israel...why was Al Qaeda unable to do anything in ISRAEL? ans: MOSSAD Israel is a Jewish state. We are a secular state. There in lies the difference. Israel simply doesn't care about a person's rights or even care for anyone but a Jew's life. They are willing to go to any extreme. I for one would be ashamed if India were to behave the way Israel does.
Gambit Posted February 23, 2010 Posted February 23, 2010 But you have to give to Israeal ' date=' even for a small country surrounded with enemies and STill alive and kicking....:hatsoff:[/quote'] None of it's neighbouring countries/enemies are nuclear states.
EnterTheVoid Posted February 23, 2010 Posted February 23, 2010 Israel simply doesn't care about a person's rights or even care for anyone but a Jew's life. They are willing to go to any extreme. You are wrong, completely wrong. Israel is the ONLY DEMOCRACY in the middle east and Arab citizens of Israel enjoy almost all of the same rights as the native Jews. Make the distinction between the The Arab citizens of Israel, who comprise 20 % of the population and Arab citizens of the terrorities, which are not part of Israel but are under Israeli occupation.
Gambit Posted February 23, 2010 Posted February 23, 2010 thats by design ... not happenstance unlike us where we sat with our hands under our butts. How could we have prevented the US from arming Pak with nukes? How could have Palestine/Jordan/Syria armed themselves with nukes with US(Israel's godfather) squeezing their nuts?
Recommended Posts