Nirvanam Posted December 11, 2010 Posted December 11, 2010 It happens when Condoms have a leak:hysterical:
Jimmy Cliff Posted December 11, 2010 Posted December 11, 2010 You make some fair points initially but the last two paragraphs are just mind-boggling. :facepalm:
Zap_Brannigan Posted December 11, 2010 Posted December 11, 2010 Hey guyz, Cricket lovers around the world eagerly wait for worldcup. But thanks to BCCI, 2011 worldcup will be the most boring worldcup in the history of the game and i can bet my life on this. I tell you why,Lets just have a look at the format ICC has come up with after coming enormous amount of pressure from BCCI.: I just read that and not going to bother reading it either. I hate the format and have written multiple rants on how this format sucks. But wtf does BCCI has anything to do with it?I know pakis are famous for creating their own conspiracy theories and running with it in major newspaper like the this weeks "Wikileaks shows India supports pak terrorists", but this is not a pak message board. FYI, the ICC gets all the money from the World cup tv rights and pays the country that hosts the games a fixed amount for the grounds. Then a percent off the profits are shared equally by all test playing nations. So WTF does BCCI has to lose if India crashes out, economically? Absolutely nothing. It is the ICC that will lose. More importantly, being the poorest board, PCB will lose more since their share will be hit. But for most other boards the cut they get from ICC is a fraction off what they make generally.So it is ICC and PCB that losses the most. Where does BCCI come into this? The format was chosen by the ICC. You cant blame pawar either since he wasnt at power when the format was fixed. So tell me , where does BCCI comes into this???
saneindian Posted December 11, 2010 Posted December 11, 2010 If you think that Bangladesh, Ireland and Zimbabwe are playing just for the numbers, you are making the same mistake as teams in 2003 and 2007 WCs made. BD are playing all their matches at home and I would fully back them to upset a few established teams. Similarly Zimbabwe and Ireland playing some of their matches in SL ( especially the D/N ones where the ball seams aroubd a lot). Then Teams would like to avoid facing particular teams in QFs and will accordingly be watching the points table. It's going to be anything but boring. Also with most of the matches in India and BD, you would expect a good crowd in the stadium (unlike the 2003 and 2007 WCs when matches not involving the home teams hardly had any crowd in the stadium). The only complaint I have with the format is that by running it for nearly 40-41 days, ICC has made it a little longer. A crispier version lasting not more than 4 weeks would have been wonderful and that was easily possible had the plan been to have at least 2 preliminary round matches every day. There are 18 days on which only one preliminary round match is being played, ICC could easily have scheduled 2 matches on at least 10 of those days and cut down the tournament by around 2 weeks.
Jersey #10 Posted December 11, 2010 Posted December 11, 2010 You think having more teams in the worldcup will expand cricket. Your right. Every one will be so excited to watch a match between australia and india (both teams will have qualified for the quarter final by then) in front of 100 spectators. This worldcup will be exactly like 1996. Not a single soul in more than 75 percent of the matches and packed up stadium in 7 matches. Like i said before' date=' good luck watching 42 long, boring, dull matches[/quote'] You have to realize that tickets were sold out a year ago. Quarter finals qualification or not, India vs OZ would be worth every penny even out of the context of the World cup. Cricket is not a game of numbers but souls. It has always excited and connected the large audience. There is a reason why it's the second largest sport in the world.
Jersey #10 Posted December 11, 2010 Posted December 11, 2010 Don't underestimate teams like Bangladesh and Zimbabwe. There are going to be a lot of set backs and surprises this time around. Bangladesh has been building and are now a decent team. They have their own top pacers, spinners, all rounders, opening specialists, middle order specialists. Not to mention that their captain has a very cool and smart head on his shoulders.
maniac Posted December 11, 2010 Posted December 11, 2010 It happens when Condoms have a leak :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
saneindian Posted December 11, 2010 Posted December 11, 2010 Even in the preliminary round, there are plenty of good matches to follow 1st Match, Group B - India v Bangladesh at Mirpur (D/N) 6th Match, Group A - Kenya v Pakistan at Hambantotta (D/N) 7th Match, Group B - South Africa v West Indies at Delhi (D/N) 9th Match, Group A - Australia v New Zealand at Nagpur (D/N) 10th Match, Group A - Sri Lanka v Pakistan at Colombo (D/N) 11th Match, Group B - India v England at Kolkata (D/N) 20th Match, Group A - Sri Lanka v Australia at Colombo (D/N) 21st Match, Group B - England v South Africa at Chennai(D/N) 24th Match, Group A - New Zealand v Pakistan at Pallekele (D/N) 28th Match, Group B - Bangladesh v England at Chittagong (D/N) 29th Match, Group B - India v South Africa at Nagpur (D/N) 33rd Match, Group A - Pakistan v Zimbabwe at Pallekele (D/N) 36th Match, Group B - England v West Indies at Chennai (D/N) 37th Match, Group A - New Zealand v Sri Lanka at Mumbai (D/N) 39th Match, Group B - Bangladesh v South Africa at Mirpur 40th Match, Group A - Australia v Pakistan at Colombo (D/N) 42nd Match, Group B - India v West Indies at Chennai(D/N) Thats some 20 out of 42 prelim matches to keenly follow. Good enough for me.
Jersey #10 Posted December 11, 2010 Posted December 11, 2010 ^I will also be interested in watching some of the afghanistan, canada and kenya games. It's always fun watching the minnows battling it out
vaibhav_delhi Posted December 11, 2010 Posted December 11, 2010 How are you guys allowed to even be born For them, BCCI is to blame for paki cirketers match phixing.
Sachin=GOD Posted December 11, 2010 Posted December 11, 2010 @son of papistan - just because you know that your team is not good enough to win the world cup (or for that matter even reach semi finals) you come here and blame the BCCI. And BTW stop talking about "minnows" as if they don't deserve a place in the world cup - they knocked you out of the world cup in 2007 :phehehe:
thongale Posted December 11, 2010 Posted December 11, 2010 How are you guys allowed to even be born SeriousAccidental. :--D
Son of Pakistan Posted December 11, 2010 Author Posted December 11, 2010 @admin could you close this thread please
Sachin=GOD Posted December 11, 2010 Posted December 11, 2010 @admin could you close this thread please why???? Now you don't want to discuss why BCCI is behind everything bad thats happening in cricket :giggle:
Son of Pakistan Posted December 11, 2010 Author Posted December 11, 2010 why???? Now you don't want to discuss why BCCI is behind everything bad thats happening in cricket :giggle: i could but you guyz are resorting to cheap tactics by bashing pakistan and personal attack. I dont know about the policy of this forum but in other forums, trolling is not allowed
sandeep Posted December 11, 2010 Posted December 11, 2010 Format is not the best - but its the ICC that decides it not BCCI. Why are you guys jumping this poor kid for one post. Be nice. Its the holidays.:--D
Mamu Posted December 11, 2010 Posted December 11, 2010 I thought condoms are haraam? Not the "used" ones.
Recommended Posts