ravishingravi Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 Some of it is rather alarming. He is probably the most balanced Pakistani journalist that I have come across. You can check out the other parts. BOqPdUZtoNc
Clarke Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 They're doing fine actually, after all they have managed to amass 100+ nukes I hope USA sticks around to secure them coz detonating one in India is certainly not an impossible event.
vaibhav_delhi Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 those haramis are holding even the US for ransom thru jehadis and nuclear weapons.:) and so the US has to feed those cockroaches.
seedhi Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 Why do Indian news channels even entertain these pakistaini undercover jehadis. This Ahmed Rashid favors the placation of pakistan by Indian largess in Kashmir and accommodation of Taliban in afghanistan and the denial of Indian legitimate interests there.
Sir_Afridi Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 Anybody who talks against Pakistan is considered balanced journalist according to India.
coffee_rules Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 Anybody who talks against Pakistan is considered balanced journalist according to India. Same is true for Indians who are seen sympathic towards Pakistan, like Shah Ruk Kaan or Salman Kaan.
Baad Indian Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 Salman , SRK and Aaamir are Pro-pakistan due to there huge fan following in the Land of Pure .
Manny_Pacquiao Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 i find it really hard to believe that we used to be one group of people. is there ever a time during the year when they ARENT protesting something?? i remain convinced that partition is the greatest thing that ever happened, who would wanna live with these animals http://www.youtube.com/embed/nZExMIPByLM http://www.youtube.com/embed/-_brWXusZHs http://www.youtube.com/embed/CS5J0TZ7Wyg http://www.youtube.com/embed/52skWZjOv28
Laaloo Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 Same is true for Indians who are seen sympathic towards Pakistan' date=' like Shah Ruk Kaan or Salman Kaan.[/quote'] and Arundhati Roy
ravishingravi Posted February 2, 2011 Author Posted February 2, 2011 Anybody who talks against Pakistan is considered balanced journalist according to India. No, anybody in Pakistan who does not resort to Quran or Qaid e Azam or conspiracy theories involving RAW, Mossad, CIA etc is relatively balanced
coffee_rules Posted February 2, 2011 Posted February 2, 2011 No' date=' anybody in Pakistan who does not resort to Quran or Qaid e Azam or conspiracy theories involving RAW, Mossad, CIA etc is relatively balanced[/quote'] Wrong...this man is the most balanced man from Pakistan:
CSK Fan Posted February 2, 2011 Posted February 2, 2011 The article was thoughtful but the comments in thsi thread are not. Surely considering the quality of posters on this forum we can do much better
seedhi Posted February 2, 2011 Posted February 2, 2011 The article was thoughtful but the comments in thsi thread are not. Surely considering the quality of posters on this forum we can do much betterWhat article?
CSK Fan Posted February 2, 2011 Posted February 2, 2011 What article? The video in the OP And some of you lambasting him, is there a single person in the world, including you, who can be 100% objective and not a bit biased towards your own country. Its not in human nature and you are the world's biggest hypocrites if you expect such a thing. Of course one is going to be biased towards once homeland where one grew up and lived, its human nature. So if a man is potraying a negative future for his country he should be applauded for his honesty, not abused. Not one of you in his position would let go of their prejudices and be so honest!
seedhi Posted February 2, 2011 Posted February 2, 2011 The video in the OP And some of you lambasting him, is there a single person in the world, including you, who can be 100% objective and not a bit biased towards your own country. Its not in human nature and you are the world's biggest hypocrites if you expect such a thing. Of course one is going to be biased towards once homeland where one grew up and lived, its human nature. So if a man is potraying a negative future for his country he should be applauded for his honesty, not abused. Not one of you in his position would let go of their prejudices and be so honest!I just want India's interests to be preserved, secured and incremented. India's interests in Kashmir, in Afghanistan and against Taliban. This fellow goes all around to world trying to link a prospective improvement in the situation in Af-pak to Indian accommodation of paki interests. His propaganda has to be condemned and at the very least not given traction in the Indian media. I dont care how honest or objective he is with respect to his own country, India's interests are paramount.
Clarke Posted February 2, 2011 Posted February 2, 2011 ^^ That's not the topic. We'd be shooting the messenger in this case if we pile on him wrt the interview. I do wonder, where is the so called peace loving majority that opposes the law. Are they scared as hell or do they not give a damn ? MTC, the nuclear threat from Pakistan exists whether we like it or not. A decade or so back, they were advertising nuclear technology & services the way Indian companies sell software services. A few kgs of fissile material can certainly be leaked out; it has already been caught multiple times in ex-Soviet block nations. The rest of the bomb is an engineering project that can be implemented in a crude manner. The Interpol issued an arrest warrant on a couple of ISI officers in relation to the 26/11 attacks, what guarantee exists that every worker of KRL does not lose track ?
Recommended Posts