Asoka Posted March 11, 2011 Posted March 11, 2011 Majid Khan was a brainless slogger. Abbas used to crap in his pants when facing a fast bowler. Both these men are not even fit to lace Sehwag's shoes. Miandad no doubt is a better batsman than Sehwag.
Passion Posted March 11, 2011 Posted March 11, 2011 I agree with legendary Holding. Michael Holding is a legend. Todays world class batsmen would have been a walking wicket for Holding
vvvslaxman Posted March 11, 2011 Posted March 11, 2011 I agree with legendary Holding. Michael Holding is a legend. Todays world class batsmen would have been a walking wicket for Holding :cantstop: [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZQ1OcUxalwg]YouTube - Michael Holding on Shoaib Akhtar's hyperextension[/ame]
ganeshran Posted March 11, 2011 Posted March 11, 2011 He is entitled to his views, even if we dont agree with what he says.
zen Posted March 11, 2011 Posted March 11, 2011 Let's not forget that he said that Steyn is the only pacer around today :P Appears as if he doesn't rate today's cricketers that highly, esp since he played w/ some of the legends during his time be it his colleagues in WI team or opposition like Lillee, Thompson, Chappell, Gavaskar, Amarnath, Kapil, Imran, Miandad, Martin Crowe, Richards Hadlee, Boycott, Botham to name a few
vaibhav_delhi Posted March 11, 2011 Posted March 11, 2011 Oldies can sometimes come up with ridiculous comments, Not to be taken seriously. Just like Gary Sobers wrote in his autobiography that Warne is overrated and that Subhash Gupte was a better legspinner.... http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/story/478062.html
Desi Cartman Posted March 11, 2011 Posted March 11, 2011 Oldies can sometimes come up with ridiculous comments, Not to be taken seriously. Just like Gary Sobers wrote in his autobiography that Warne is overrated and that Subhash Gupte was a better legspinner.... http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/story/478062.html In Hindi it's called "sathiana"
Passion Posted March 11, 2011 Posted March 11, 2011 In Hindi it's called "sathiana" In english, its called Truth hurts:--D:--D:--D
vvvslaxman Posted March 11, 2011 Posted March 11, 2011 I am yet to come across an impartial west indies analyst.
coffee_rules Posted March 11, 2011 Posted March 11, 2011 In english' date=' its called Tooth hurts:--D:--D:--D[/quote'] Fixed.
Switchblade Posted March 11, 2011 Author Posted March 11, 2011 I am yet to come across an impartial west indies analyst. IAN BISHOP is good isnt he impartial?
vvvslaxman Posted March 11, 2011 Posted March 11, 2011 IAN BISHOP is good isnt he impartial? Yea.. he is good.. he gives due credit to other players. Tony cozier is a very emotional WI commie. He has been doing it for 50 years. But he is far too emotionally attached to his side.
Switchblade Posted March 11, 2011 Author Posted March 11, 2011 Yea.. he is good.. he gives due credit to other players. Tony cozier is a very emotional WI commie. He has been doing it for 50 years. But he is far too emotionally attached to his side. Agree but is a nice commentator IMO agree with you on this though that he becomes emotional when Windies were losing to Saffers an year back or were about to lose he used to discuss the issues regarding how the system is not good and all that stuff
DomainK Posted March 11, 2011 Posted March 11, 2011 Really poor coming from someone like Holding. Sehwag has achieved enough and even though some of the oldies just can't get over his lack of technique, the fact remains that he has scored some of his runs against some really good quality bowling on tricky pitches. In the end, it's performance that matters.
vvvslaxman Posted March 11, 2011 Posted March 11, 2011 Really poor coming from someone like Holding. Sehwag has achieved enough and even though some of the oldies just can't get over his lack of technique' date=' the fact remains that he has scored some of his runs against some really good quality bowling on tricky pitches. In the end, it's performance that matters.[/quote'] He has to go back and look at how Cheeka with zero technique gave some royal thrashing to their bowlers in the world cup final. :haha:
ganeshran Posted March 11, 2011 Posted March 11, 2011 most commies are attached to their sides. SG is also quite biased (for India and against Australia). Sehwag's technique isnt really perfect, but he has amazing hand eye coordination and shot selection which helps him score against the best of bowlers However, Holding named Pakistani players because he was talking to the padosi forums
vvvslaxman Posted March 11, 2011 Posted March 11, 2011 most commies are attached to their sides. SG is also quite biased (for India and against Australia). Sehwag's technique isnt really perfect, but he has amazing hand eye coordination and shot selection which helps him score against the best of bowlers However, Holding named Pakistani players because he was talking to the padosi forums I very much doubt the veracity of the interview since Zaheer has very poor average against Windies. It is almost like TOI interview. You can write whatever you want.
Bublu Bhuyan Posted March 11, 2011 Posted March 11, 2011 Do you now understand why he took the names of Mazid Khan, Javed Miandad and Zaheer Abbas? He was giving this interview to the 'Padosi' website. What else do you expect?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now