Serani Posted July 25, 2011 Posted July 25, 2011 Oh woops 5-65 on a flat track in glorious sunshine :giggle:
Rajiv Posted July 25, 2011 Posted July 25, 2011 But at home in english conditions, that too for a team with niggles and trying to save a game
BERGKAMP Posted July 25, 2011 Posted July 25, 2011 It's nothing to do with overcast conditions according to Nasser and N.A.S.A, its all about your skill with the seam.
Serani Posted July 25, 2011 Author Posted July 25, 2011 But at home in english conditions' date=' that too for a team with niggles and trying to save a game[/quote'] But you have all being saying when the sun shines he cant take wickets no? He didnt even get wickets with swing in this innings, what a bowler.
Kookabura Posted July 25, 2011 Posted July 25, 2011 Somebody who dismisses Tendulkar every 19 or so runs has to be good. Well bowled, Jimmy Anderson
ganeshran Posted July 25, 2011 Posted July 25, 2011 Home track bully... But when he is in rhythm, bowls amazingly well.
Serani Posted July 25, 2011 Author Posted July 25, 2011 Anderson has been upgraded from a overcast bully to home track bully, job well done jimmy.
zen Posted July 25, 2011 Posted July 25, 2011 Good bowler .... Though even PK took a 5-er so shouldn't be surprising :P
Yoda-esque Posted July 25, 2011 Posted July 25, 2011 Pressure to keep your wicket in the 4th innings is multiplied a million times and plays on the batsman's mind. Hes a good bowler when the ball is swinging,I'll admit that but a mediocre bowler otherwise. The same Anderson got thrashed in the WC..forget that ??:giggle:
Kumar Posted July 25, 2011 Posted July 25, 2011 Oh woops 5-65 on a flat track in glorious sunshine :giggle: Laxman - very unlucky not to get it over, hardly owned by anderson Tendulkar - His record speaks for himself at Lords Bhaji - Rash shot Dravid - lost concentration, hardly a corker! Raina - good delivery :hatsoff: to Anderson, but I wouldnt go over the top, considering it wasnt one of his most fluent 5ivers I see, but still he maintained good composure and line and length to get the wickets ( All im saying is dont go too overboard... you understand :winky:)
ganeshran Posted July 25, 2011 Posted July 25, 2011 Anderson has been upgraded from a overcast bully to home track bully' date=' job well done jimmy.[/quote'] I never called him an overcast bully. But when one says that Thilan Samaraveera's 50+ average has no meaning because of continuous batting on easy home tracks, then the same logic should be applied to bowlers who perform well only in friendly or familiar conditions.
Guest Gunner Posted July 25, 2011 Posted July 25, 2011 Well bowled Jimmy. Delivered when the team needed it.
flamy Posted July 25, 2011 Posted July 25, 2011 Anderson has been upgraded from a overcast bully to home track bully' date=' job well done jimmy.[/quote'] :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Trichromatic Posted July 25, 2011 Posted July 25, 2011 Laxman - very unlucky not to get it over, hardly owned by anderson Tendulkar - His record speaks for himself at Lords Bhaji - Rash shot Dravid - lost concentration, hardly a corker! Raina - good delivery :hatsoff: to Anderson, but I wouldnt go over the top, considering it wasnt one of his most fluent 5ivers I see, but still he maintained good composure and line and length to get the wickets ( All im saying is dont go too overboard... you understand :winky:) Generally bowlers who do well, get some easy wickets. Those are the parts which come from bowling well, maintaining pressure and support from other bowlers/fielders. We see many times batsman getting completely beaten on best deliveries. Look at the whole match. You'll find very few batsman who were not dismissed by their own mistake and were outplayed good balls. Anderson bowled very good line and length and he got rewarded for that. Good performance. :clap:
wobblydoggy Posted July 25, 2011 Posted July 25, 2011 Pressure to keep your wicket in the 4th innings is multiplied a million times and plays on the batsman's mind. Hes a good bowler when the ball is swinging,I'll admit that but a mediocre bowler otherwise. The same Anderson got thrashed in the WC..forget that ??:giggle: Because he was shattered after the Long Ashes series, thats why.
Guest Gunner Posted July 25, 2011 Posted July 25, 2011 Because he was shattered after the Long Ashes series' date=' thats why.[/quote'] Now, now, now...let's not get carried away. Jimmy being jimmy would have done sweet **** all in India, both of us know that.
wobblydoggy Posted July 25, 2011 Posted July 25, 2011 Now' date=' now, now...let's not get carried away. Jimmy being jimmy would have done sweet **** all in India, both of us know that.[/quote'] True on those feather beds you lot produce. Well at least Jimmy has a new bunny Tendulkar:--D
Guest Gunner Posted July 25, 2011 Posted July 25, 2011 True on those feather beds you lot produce. Well at least Jimmy has a new bunny Tendulkar:--D Well I prefer my bunnies to be younger usually. :winky:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now