Square Drive Posted August 23, 2011 Posted August 23, 2011 seriously dude- forget the ICC 15 degree angles etc does this seem normal bowling action to you?? look at the 2nd wkt (Hasting) - that was a run out from Malinga, not a bowler's wkt !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 :((:((
Square Drive Posted August 23, 2011 Posted August 23, 2011 He'll take at least five hat-tricks in his ODI career if he plays few more years hopefully.. :aha:
Sachinism Posted August 23, 2011 Posted August 23, 2011 seriously dude- forget the ICC 15 degree angles etc does this seem normal bowling action to you?? look at the 2nd wkt (Hasting) - that was a run out from Malinga, not a bowler's wkt !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 yeah because ICC says so?? Even underarm was legal at some point- remember? :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: So we should ban him from cricket because YOU say his action is illegal?
Hell Raiser Posted August 23, 2011 Posted August 23, 2011 Although I don't like his action, but i find it amazing how he keep landing those yorkers and at good pace consistently. 3 hat tricks at international level is a brilliant achievement.
Pak_Fan_4_Eva Posted August 23, 2011 Posted August 23, 2011 He's rubbish against India and Pakistan. Phenomenal against the "white" teams. A decent bowler, in short. Highly accurate with his yorkers though and that's quite nice to see in Cricket nowadays.
ganeshran Posted August 23, 2011 Posted August 23, 2011 He has great disciple and accuracy. But set batsman can play him off easier than someone who has just come in. However, when on full song, no one can keep blocking off those deadly yorkers.
ganeshran Posted August 23, 2011 Posted August 23, 2011 How can you chuck with a slingy action? It is extremely difficult to bend the arm at that angle and the pace.
Sidhoni Posted August 23, 2011 Posted August 23, 2011 He's rubbish against India and Pakistan. Phenomenal against the "white" teams. A decent bowler, in short. Highly accurate with his yorkers though and that's quite nice to see in Cricket nowadays. Kenyans are white? :hmmm:
CSK Fan Posted August 23, 2011 Posted August 23, 2011 seriously dude- forget the ICC 15 degree angles etc does this seem normal bowling action to you?? look at the 2nd wkt (Hasting) - that was a run out from Malinga, not a bowler's wkt !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 Chandrapaul's batting action too looks abnormal to me. Should ban the fecker too
daryl1985 Posted August 23, 2011 Posted August 23, 2011 Outstanding bowler. Best T20 bowler by miles and certainly one of the best ODI bowlers. Much more effective against right handers though.
cameron_black Posted August 23, 2011 Posted August 23, 2011 seriously dude- forget the ICC 15 degree angles etc does this seem normal bowling action to you?? look at the 2nd wkt (Hasting) - that was a run out from Malinga, not a bowler's wkt !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 try to come up with a decent enough argument at least. the ball didn't even hit the wicket in that dismissal, and you're claiming it's a runout??? shows how much you know about cricket :cantstop:
Cricket Tragic Posted August 23, 2011 Posted August 23, 2011 try to come up with a decent enough argument at least. the ball didn't even hit the wicket in that dismissal' date=' and you're claiming it's a runout??? shows how much you know about cricket :cantstop:[/quote'] :facepalm: He meant that the delivery was not legitimate.
Trichromatic Posted August 23, 2011 Posted August 23, 2011 4 balls in 4 wickets against SA - should it be counted as 2 hat-tricks? Btw, for the slingy action rule is that your arm shouldn't go below shoulder level and Malinga's action is good with that rule. If someone thinks that it's equivalent to run-out then how many times you see an actual run-out with straight arm at or above shoulder level?
Lord Posted August 23, 2011 Posted August 23, 2011 absolute monster against the tail.does what Waqar used to do.if we had such we'd have done well in England
cameron_black Posted August 23, 2011 Posted August 23, 2011 :facepalm: He meant that the delivery was not legitimate. oh, thank you for enlightening me. wonder why he specifically chose the lbw to stress that fact when he could have easily chosen one of the two bowled dismissals :hmmm:
Cricket Tragic Posted August 23, 2011 Posted August 23, 2011 oh' date=' thank you for enlightening me. wonder why he specifically chose the lbw to stress that fact when he could have easily chosen one of the two bowled dismissals :hmmm:[/quote'] I think he thought that that delivery was 'more round arm' than the other two. I don't agree with any of this btw.
cameron_black Posted August 23, 2011 Posted August 23, 2011 I think he thought that that delivery was 'more round arm' than the other two. I don't agree with any of this btw. :two_thumbs_up:
nballa Posted August 23, 2011 Posted August 23, 2011 malinga's action is actually more round arm than a side arm. remember the earth's axis is tilted by 23 degrees, that causes his action to appear more side arm/slingy.
Ram Posted August 23, 2011 Posted August 23, 2011 malinga's action is actually more round arm than a side arm. remember the earth's axis is tilted by 23 degrees' date= that causes his action to appear more side arm/slingy. Oh dear. :hysterical::hysterical:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now