Shame on India..

[Mariyam]

Shame on India!!! Lannat hai BCCI pe. Making matches so one sided. Public don't even get to watch close contests. BCCI should add extra rules to even the competition. 1) Every time Sehwag's strike rate gets over 130, he should be given out. 2) One bounce catch out allowed for Sehwag 3) India can only send 5 batsmen. 4) India should declare their innings as soon as they touch 300. 5) India should always include at least 2 of the following 3 bowlers in the squad: Agarkar, Vinay Kumar and Sreesanth. Shame on BCCI. They make the matches so one sided.

[Magneto]

Shame on India!!! Lannat hai BCCI pe. Making matches so one sided. Public don't even get to watch close contests. BCCI should add extra rules to even the competition. 1) Every time Sehwag's strike rate gets over 130, he should be given out. 2) One bounce catch out allowed for Sehwag 3) India can only send 5 batsmen. 4) India should declare their innings as soon as they touch 300. 5) India should always include at least 2 of the following 3 bowlers in the squad: Agarkar, Vinay Kumar and Sreesanth. Shame on BCCI. They make the matches so one sided.

I don't mind the bowling squad actually :--D

[Sachin=GOD]

Shame on India!!! Lannat hai BCCI pe. Making matches so one sided. Public don't even get to watch close contests. BCCI should add extra rules to even the competition. 1) Every time Sehwag's strike rate gets over 130, he should be given out. 2) One bounce catch out allowed for Sehwag 3) India can only send 5 batsmen. 4) India should declare their innings as soon as they touch 300. 5) India should always include at least 2 of the following 3 bowlers in the squad: Agarkar, Vinay Kumar and Sreesanth. Shame on BCCI. They make the matches so one sided.

Agarkar ain't bad.

[Mariyam]

Agarkar ain't bad.

Agarkar ain't bad if you want to accumulate air miles on the Bhuvaneshwar Mumbai route. For an ODI, I'm not that sure.:winky:

[Sachin=GOD]

^:headshake:

[carnish]

Agarkar ain't bad if you want to accumulate air miles on the Bhuvaneshwar Mumbai route. For an ODI, I'm not that sure.:winky:

:hysterical::cantstop:

[carnish]

But really Agarkar was one of the better indian ODI bowlers...288 wickets...:hatsoff: Credeit where due..

[G_B_]

I am sorry but this was a extremely flat pitch. Scoreboard pressure got the better of the windies. that all. The windies went for the total. If they would have been bangladesh they would have sat back and crawled to 300. Not taking anything away from sehwag though. He probably added 50-60 runs to what India would have got.

[ganeshran]

This was a pitch where the par score was 300 and we should have atleast scored 330-350. Sehwag's innings got us past 400.

[deathmonger]

tbh agarkar was pretty decent. agarkar, munaf and nehra get more flak here than they deserve. were decent loi bowlers. sree sucks yes.

[Stuge]

Duh !... what a thread.I guess this because of ball tempering that Windies falter during their batting .

[Cricket_2_Death]

All of you guys got it wrong, it was some RAW conspiracy to give India a comfortable victory since all the others have been so close. :hysterical:

[Manny_Pacquiao]

LMFAOOOOO the best match fixing i have ever seen in my life. the paki kuttas are trying to figure out why their ENTIRE BATTING LINEUP could only score a limp 177 :hysterical::hysterical: against Bnagladeshh :hysterical::hysterical: and how just ONE INDIAN BATSMAN outscored 11 pakis :hysterical: how many matches would amar ukmal need to score 219?? :nervous::nervous:

[Sachin=GOD]

LMFAOOOOO the best match fixing i have ever seen in my life. the paki kuttas are trying to figure out why their ENTIRE BATTING LINEUP could only score a limp 177 :hysterical::hysterical: against Bnagladeshh :hysterical::hysterical: and how just ONE INDIAN BATSMAN outscored 11 pakis :hysterical: how many matches would amar ukmal need to score 219?? :nervous::nervous:

he would score that much in the Hong Kong Super 6s :yay:

[panther]

LMFAOOOOO the best match fixing i have ever seen in my life. the paki kuttas are trying to figure out why their ENTIRE BATTING LINEUP could only score a limp 177 :hysterical::hysterical: against Bnagladeshh :hysterical::hysterical: and how just ONE INDIAN BATSMAN outscored 11 pakis :hysterical: how many matches would amar ukmal need to score 219?? :nervous::nervous:

that was a sqaure turner

[nitinbwj]

deodorant narine got hammered.:giggle:

[Magneto]

that was a sqaure turner

Even in a non-square unturner, the Paki team wouldn't score much. Had they played on the same pitch, they would have folded up before scoring 275.

[Magneto]

LMFAOOOOO the best match fixing i have ever seen in my life. the paki kuttas are trying to figure out why their ENTIRE BATTING LINEUP could only score a limp 177 :hysterical::hysterical: against Bnagladeshh :hysterical::hysterical: and how just ONE INDIAN BATSMAN outscored 11 pakis :hysterical: how many matches would amar ukmal need to score 219?? :nervous::nervous:

I doubt if the three Akmals put together can score 219 in a single match.

[panther]

Even in a non-square unturner' date=' the Paki team wouldn't score much. Had they played in the same pitch, they would have folded up before scoring 275.[/quote'] well it dosen't help when you have yk,malik, farhat and tanvir in the same team

[ganeshran]

Pakistan's strength is not its batting. Of course their players wont be able to score that much. They are a bowling heavy side and more adept at defending low scores than putting big totals on the board.