Will we see a 140K VK or a DULL under 130K VK in asia cup ?

[Laaloo]

let s see his performance today and decide whether he is fast enough or he is a boring trundler- lets wait and watch him bowl today.

Then why don't you wait first?

[CG]

Then why don't you wait first?

:hysterical::hysterical:,Yeah yeah they are bowling at unplayable speeds of 125km/h

[Ultimate_Game]

We got our answer. It's the 120-130 kph trundlers who showed up for us

[chainsmoker1985]

How many swing bowlers are you going to play in a single match? Praveen, Irfan and VK, bloody all swing bowlers, no hit the deck or tall bouncy bowler

[ricky8741]

wat hapned to varoon tharoon

[msb1991]

How many swing bowlers are you going to play in a single match? Praveen' date=' Irfan and VK, bloody all swing bowlers, no hit the deck or tall bouncy bowler[/quote'] Erm...we won the game? Pathan took 4 and Vinay took 3. What is your complaint now?

[Old guy]

Erm...we won the game? Pathan took 4 and Vinay took 3. What is your complaint now?

did u saw the match bro ? pathan yes he did well enough but it was ashwin who really brought us back vinay .. when it was needed flooped so did pk .. so ya he is correct one swing bowler was enough maybe two.. as 2 out of 3 failed.!

[The Dark Horse]

He's just warming up after injury just chill guys:cool:

[msb1991]

did u saw the match bro ? pathan yes he did well enough but it was ashwin who really brought us back vinay .. when it was needed flooped so did pk .. so ya he is correct one swing bowler was enough maybe two.. as 2 out of 3 failed.!

When it was needed? It was not needed because someone else performed. Calling it a 'flop' to have a poor spell and then come back to clean up the tail is a very harsh use of the term.

[CG]

When it was needed? It was not needed because someone else performed. Calling it a 'flop' to have a poor spell and then come back to clean up the tail is a very harsh use of the term.

:hysterical::hysterical: getting hammered by top batsman and seeking solace by getting tailenders who try to hit out is :hysterical:

[Old guy]

When it was needed? It was not needed because someone else performed. Calling it a 'flop' to have a poor spell and then come back to clean up the tail is a very harsh use of the term.

sorry but i will give credit for that wickets to dhoni more then naything using his weaker bowlers when there is no pressure but if u do consider these guys weak bowlers why not give nay one else chance ok let vk play one more game but wht the phack has pk done to deserve place? or jaddu for that matter?

[chainsmoker1985]

When it was needed? It was not needed because someone else performed. Calling it a 'flop' to have a poor spell and then come back to clean up the tail is a very harsh use of the term.

You have 4 fast bowlers in squad. 3 out of them are swing bowlers, who bowls at 126-135 and look to swing the ball, then the 4rth fast bowler is a genuine pacer who hits the deck hard and bowls consistent 140+. You yourself answer this question, if you have to choose 3 bowlers out of 4, who will you choose. Definitely, anyone will go with 2 swing bowlers and 1 hit the deck bowler. IMO, PK and VK should not at all be picked together. Even Bangladesh pace attack looks better in front of us, in terms of speed and aggression. They have Murtaja(135), Islam(135-140) and Shahdat Hossain(135). And what is Jadeja doing in the team, for last so many matches?

[jairamesh]

Dinda? benchwarmer What's the point, really what's the effing point of these selections. It boggles the mind how this management is going take this team forward, there isn't even a hint of risk taking.

[msb1991]

You have 4 fast bowlers in squad. 3 out of them are swing bowlers' date=' who bowls at 126-135 and look to swing the ball, then the 4rth fast bowler is a genuine pacer who hits the deck hard and bowls consistent 140+. You yourself answer this question, if you have to choose 3 bowlers out of 4, who will you choose.[/quote'] Depends on the quality of the players. I too would have picked Dinda, but the priority would have been Praveen being in poor form rather than any sort of pseudo-science around bowler style.

[vishalvirsingh]

I did not see Indian bowling. Vk bowled under 130K My heart is BROKEN I hate him

[urbestfriend]

I did not see Indian bowling. Vk bowled under 130K My heart is BROKEN I hate him

:hysterical:

[Old guy]

:bow:

[chainsmoker1985]

I did not see Indian bowling. Vk bowled under 130K My heart is BROKEN I hate him

:hehe::hehe: Now you r woken up

[Number]

I did not see Indian bowling. Vk bowled under 130K My heart is BROKEN I hate him

:haha:

[vishalvirsingh]

:haha:

What disappoints me is that when he is capable to bowl fast upto 140K why does he not push himself to do his best?? Munaf was like that- capable to bowl at 144K but wud bowl at 125K- and expect good line n length at 125K will fetch him wicekts. Thats whay I still favour and support ISHANT as I beleive that its just a matter of next match or the next when he will take bucket full of wickets as I beleive a genuine fast bowler ( 140K+) will get bucket full of wickets as soon as his line n length is sorted out well. VK will be sorted out soon and he will become totally wicekt less and will be thrashed like anything if he does not improve back.