deathmonger Posted March 21, 2012 Posted March 21, 2012 if there is any oscar award for selfish play ' date=' he will win it for his selfish play for his 100th 100:hysterical::hysterical:[/quote'] go back to pp man.
velu Posted March 21, 2012 Posted March 21, 2012 go back to pp man. will be active in both PP and ICF from now :icflove: was not active in ICF bcoz they blocked icf address in my office b4 ( and proxy was slow )
akshayxyz Posted March 21, 2012 Posted March 21, 2012 Sachin Tendulkar has scored 49 ODI centuries and 96 ODI 50s. If he scores 1 more 100 and 4 more 50s, he will become the first player in the history of cricket to score 50 100s and 100 50s in ODIs. He has taken 199 wickets in International cricket (154 + 45 ). If he takes one more wicket, he will become the only cricketer in history to have scored more than 33,000 runs and 200 wickets in internationsl cricket. He has scored 33,896 runs in international cricket cricket - He needs another 1104 runs to reach 35,000 runs. Quite a few landmarks...:two_thumbs_up: hmm.. needs to be careful there. he must not convert 4 of the 50s into 100s, otherwise he might take longer to get there - wont be in the interest of the team.
akshayxyz Posted March 21, 2012 Posted March 21, 2012 Here comes a time he will be breaking creating some record or else every match. May be record keepers will even miss some. FTFY.
velu Posted March 21, 2012 Posted March 21, 2012 Sachin Tendulkar has scored 49 ODI centuries and 96 ODI 50s. If he scores 1 more 100 and 4 more 50s, he will become the first player in the history of cricket to score 50 100s and 100 50s in ODIs. errr.. still he is the first player to score 9 ODI centuries and 96 ODI 50s :two_thumbs_up:
zen Posted March 22, 2012 Posted March 22, 2012 Kapil paaji is one of my fav cricketers so I will use him to illustrate the difference b/w 'records': type a) Ind is 17/5 vs Zim in 1983 WC. Kapil paaji walks in and blasts a memorable inning posting 175 not out, which was probably the higest ODI score at that time .... that's a record :hatsoff: type b) Kapil paaji is aging and has become greater than the game in Ind. "Probably" his personal goal is to be rated as the best amongst the 4 great all-rounders and thinks that having the WR would place him in that position :dontknow: .... whatever the reason, he continues till he gets the record. There were jokes that Hadlee should come out of retirement and play a series in which he would take enough wkts for make it almost impossible for Kapil to break it. The assumption being that whatever Hadlee would get in one series, Kapil would need tons to get that many. Such 'records' should not be appreciated by fans We should not forget that cricketers are humans too and despite being superstars, they too can lose the sense of things. Being a fan doesn't mean one has to "blindly" support what your fav superstar does. If we continue with this meaningless pursuit for the sake of getting 'type b' records, as i have said before, a day 'could' come when a batsman on 99 could go for a single on the last ball with India needing a boundary to win
pensionplan Posted March 22, 2012 Posted March 22, 2012 Kapil paaji is one of my fav cricketers so I will use him to illustrate the difference b/w 'records': type a) Ind is 17/5 vs Zim in 1983 WC. Kapil paaji walks in and blasts a memorable inning posting 175 not out, which was probably the higest ODI score at that time .... that's a record :hatsoff: type b) Kapil paaji is aging and has become greater than the game in Ind. "Probably" his personal goal is to be rated as the best amongst the 4 great all-rounders and thinks that having the WR would place him in that position :dontknow: .... whatever the reason, he continues till he gets the record. There were jokes that Hadlee should come out of retirement and play a series in which he would take enough wkts for make it almost impossible for Kapil to break it. The assumption being that whatever Hadlee would get in one series, Kapil would need tons to get that many. Such 'records' should not be appreciated by fans We should not forget that cricketers are humans too and despite being superstars, they too can lose the sense of things. Being a fan doesn't mean one has to "blindly" support what your fav superstar does. If we continue with this meaningless pursuit for the sake of getting 'type b' records, as i have said before, a day 'could' come when a batsman on 99 could go for a single on the last ball with India needing a boundary to winNice.
adi B Posted March 22, 2012 Posted March 22, 2012 has he scored 50 ducks in all format yet? i guess he will nd be the only player to do so
Dravid_TheWall Posted March 22, 2012 Posted March 22, 2012 has he scored 50 ducks in all format yet? i guess he will nd be the only player to do so :cantstop::cantstop:
velu Posted March 22, 2012 Posted March 22, 2012 has he scored 50 ducks in all format yet? i guess he will nd be the only player to do so :hatsoff: riling up sachinstas is real fun
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now