veer Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 totally option 2.. and no its not Iraq, Iran or pakistan.. its Saudi Arabia who is responsible.. its funny how ppl think its US job. hahah brain washing machine company is alive and kicking.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gator Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 It is definitely a terrorist job... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 It is 100% terrorist job. No conspiracy theories here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rajiv Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 Zoots, I saw your point- My eyes are opened I turn around and see how this all could be a secret is the american gov.t that merciless to kill their own? I really don't know My other theory: When this happened, Pakistan was bankrupt and they had some major economic issues. They made it happen as they knew US would come down hunting in those mountains and need their support for $$ Disclaimer: Above is a joke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dial_100 Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 OMG.. 6 of us think US had a hand in it???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gambit Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 Voted for the 2nd option. There is no way an industrialised nation's govt will butcher 3000+ of it's own citizens and get away with it in broad daylight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 OMG.. 6 of us think US had a hand in it???? And 3 more dont know who did it :sad_smile: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cricketics Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 none of the above.. its just pakistan.... p.s - i hope cc1981 won't quote me for this.. i was getting bored in office.. saw a pakistani collegue just now and i was in this thread so connection yaa.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rajiv Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 Since we have about 24 votes, can we forwad this to UN or something? Whats this gonna change? We will live our lives just the we are doing right now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 And 3 more dont know who did it :sad_smile: :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaurav Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 "I don't know" was my answer. Too many loose ends for me to come to any definite conclusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
varun Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 I chose "I don't know" as well. I know nothing except the fact that I know nothing -- Socrates :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rajiv Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 Me too, I really don't know This evidence is quite compelling and on the other hand you beg the question if US govt would kill their own From a long term agenda 1) Gain Sympathy and use the world as wild west 2) Justification to build the tallest building in NYC ( doesnt make sense ) 3) Actually root out terrorism with world support which wasn't normally possible 4) Where is the pentagon airplane ( why did cops want this gas station camera which was facing the pentagon ) 5) Did the airlane CEO give them the plane? Air traffic controllers were robots? 6) Osama is a brilliant aghan actor, and Al-Jazeera is actually a basement office at CNN headquarters Unless you guys use some other source than TV news and/or the web..I still say I dont know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 Me too, I really don't know This evidence is quite compelling and on the other hand you beg the question if US govt would kill their own From a long term agenda 1) Gain Sympathy and use the world as wild west 2) Justification to build the tallest building in NYC ( doesnt make sense ) 3) Actually root out terrorism with world support which wasn't normally possible 4) Where is the pentagon airplane ( why did cops want this gas station camera which was facing the pentagon ) 5) Did the airlane CEO give them the plane? Air traffic controllers were robots? 6) Osama is a brilliant aghan actor, and Al-Jazeera is actually a basement office at CNN headquarters Unless you guys use some other source than TV news and/or the web..I still say I dont know Rajeev. I can answer some of the points you raised up above, if not all. However instead of doing that I will ask you a question - "If 9/11 was even remotely linked to US and not Al-Qaeda, why has OBL claimed responsibility for it?" Unless OBL is completely stupid..or worse if you beleive OBL and US Govt. are in bed together it is pretty much simple as far as I am concerned really. xxx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zap_Brannigan Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 1) Gain Sympathy and use the world as wild west It is the strongest freaking nation in the world.....and the only country it didn't have objection to invade was afghanistan, which has no oil and there is no monetary or other interest for the US there. 2) Justification to build the tallest building in NYC ( doesnt make sense ) Ya,really!!?? 3) Actually root out terrorism with world support which wasn't normally possible Are they even trying?I never saw them freezing Saudi funds....Never saw a bomb drop in karachi. Afghanistan was just 1 of the 3 main spot of islamic terrorism and it just had training grounds. The bodies and funds are supplied by Saud and Pak, both are only gaining from this. 4) Where is the pentagon airplane ( why did cops want this gas station camera which was facing the pentagon ) 1 Unknown where thousands could easily be up if it was a conspiracy. 5) Did the airlane CEO give them the plane? Air traffic controllers were robots? Exactly! 6) Osama is a brilliant aghan actor, and Al-Jazeera is actually a basement office at CNN headquarters I thought thats wht Pak believed anyway. Oil is the only resources anyone would want from the middle east. Afghanistan, where the fight took place doesnt have it. Is it really worth kiliing 5000 of your citizens to inflict fear among the population? All for what? There is nothing for the US to gain from all this. If they wanted to use it as a reason to invade Iraq, evcn Cheny would have had the common sense to use Iraqi terrorists and not saudi one or atleast they cd have manipulated the news to report them as iraqi terrorists........you know,since they manipulated everything else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rajiv Posted August 7, 2007 Share Posted August 7, 2007 Rajeev. I can answer some of the points you raised up above, if not all. However instead of doing that I will ask you a question - "If 9/11 was even remotely linked to US and not Al-Qaeda, why has OBL claimed responsibility for it?" Unless OBL is completely stupid..or worse if you beleive OBL and US Govt. are in bed together it is pretty much simple as far as I am concerned really. xxx Wasnt Osama a friend of US b4 What do you say to those vids posted by zooter and no sign of airplane in the pentagon When I saw these vids way back on the tube, I was sold but then again will the US govt do it fark it, I am focussed on dawood now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Posted August 7, 2007 Share Posted August 7, 2007 I voted for "I don't know". There are certain valid arguments from both factions and I can't quite make my mind up at this point in time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Outsider Posted August 7, 2007 Share Posted August 7, 2007 There was surely a US involvement in the pentagon incident. Regarding the towers, I have read pretty good independent studies from scientists on either side of the spectrum to decide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CC1981 Posted August 7, 2007 Share Posted August 7, 2007 So naive about islam and what it stands for. The word jihad mean anything to you? So ignorant to think this applies to all muslims and their interpretation of the Koran though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
feverpitch Posted August 7, 2007 Share Posted August 7, 2007 I resent the term 'inside job'- that means that it was totally arranged for and planned out by the US. I don't think it was- it was much more a case of US picking up advanced intel and letting it happen anyways or adding a few touches to it to 'maximise effects'. But yes' date=' there definitely was some inside involvement.[/quote'] well said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts