Guest Posted July 11, 2012 Posted July 11, 2012 That's why I gave example of doosra. How do they check whether doosra of bowler is legal or not if it doesn't turn? :dontknow: do they check video of the dosra bowled in matches and the doosra bowled during tests..the turn may not be great or effective during testing but it may be big during matches
vvvslaxman Posted July 11, 2012 Posted July 11, 2012 That's why I gave example of doosra. How do they check whether doosra of bowler is legal or not if it doesn't turn? :dontknow: Even in the real match scenario they exhibit that variation.Ranging from turning sharp and turning only a bit. You think every single doosra bowled by Ajmal turns exactly the same amount. Also he doesn't call it doosra. He calls it Teesra :cantstop:
Pioneer Posted July 11, 2012 Posted July 11, 2012 @ those who think that a bent arm = chucking, it does not. To get a good idea of the situation, one should read George Dobell's piece on Ajmal. http://www.espncricinfo.com/pakistan-v-england-2012/content/story/552586.html
ravishingravi Posted July 11, 2012 Posted July 11, 2012 There is little doubt that he chucks. BUt with the laws now, he is fine I guess. Either ways, SL is last country that should complain.
Ultimate_Game Posted July 11, 2012 Posted July 11, 2012 It's clear Ajmal is a chucker. Hell his arm is bent more than a javelin thrower when he throws (can't use the word "bowls" here). But it's indeed ironical to see Loins crying and complaining about it as historically whatever they have managed to accomplish in cricket itself is due to a chucker and the reason this chucking business is out of hand. If Murali ha been rightly called for chucking, Loins record would have been at the level of Zimboks and Bangbros :giggle:
Trichromatic Posted July 11, 2012 Posted July 11, 2012 It's clear Ajmal is a chucker. Hell his arm is bent more than a javelin thrower when he throws (can't use the word "bowls" here). But it's indeed ironical to see Loins crying and complaining about it as historically whatever they have managed to accomplish in cricket itself is due to a chucker and the reason this chucking business is out of hand. If Murali ha been rightly called for chucking' date= Loins record would have been at the level of Zimboks and Bangbros :giggle: Are you Bedi?
rajmarie Posted July 11, 2012 Posted July 11, 2012 ^ :hysterical: Invincible at home Dispensable abroad should be their tag line. :--D Are we any better. The last 2 "abroad" series...we were despensed completely & white washed..& its 0-8. Not even a draw.
Ultimate_Game Posted July 11, 2012 Posted July 11, 2012 Are you Bedi? Bedi for once was right on Murali & Ajmal. As the saying goes "even a broken clock is right twice in a day" :winky:
adi B Posted July 11, 2012 Posted July 11, 2012 i dont care about bent arm or sh1t, all i know is, i have seen him give massive jerk whilst bowling...yesterday he went mad nd insane while bowling to perera
Raghav_12 Posted July 11, 2012 Posted July 11, 2012 wrong decisions wont hide the fact that ajmal is a chuckmal Ajmal not being No-Balled itself is wrong decision which gets repeated 6 times in each Ajmal over. How many wrong decisions Pakistani's are talking about?
SLICKR392 Posted July 11, 2012 Author Posted July 11, 2012 Are we any better. The last 2 "abroad" series...we were despensed completely & white washed..& its 0-8. Not even a draw. Where did he say that "we" are any better? Their last tour to Aus, even they got white washed. Atleast we managed to dominate them at home!!
JaFanatic Posted July 11, 2012 Posted July 11, 2012 Ajmal not being No-Balled itself is wrong decision which gets repeated 6 times in each Ajmal over. How many wrong decisions Pakistani's are talking about? 20 is what they say. I din follow the match closely so m not sure of dat
siri Posted July 12, 2012 Posted July 12, 2012 It's clear Ajmal is a chucker. Hell his arm is bent more than a javelin thrower when he throws (can't use the word "bowls" here). But it's indeed ironical to see Loins crying and complaining about it as historically whatever they have managed to accomplish in cricket itself is due to a chucker and the reason this chucking business is out of hand. If Murali ha been rightly called for chucking' date=' Loins record would have been at the level of Zimboks and Bangbros :giggle:[/quote'] so u guys thinks harbhajan singh's action is clean and he is not a chucker.lol. that means watever u guys have also achieved incuding the home series against australia 2001 was all fluke.beleive me if not for harbhajan singh aus would have won that series 3-0:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Trichromatic Posted July 12, 2012 Posted July 12, 2012 so u guys thinks harbhajan singh's action is clean and he is not a chucker.lol. that means watever u guys have also achieved incuding the home series against australia 2001 was all fluke.beleive me if not for harbhajan singh aus would have won that series 3-0:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: +1 At least in his case rules haven't been changed. :winky:
Crookbond Posted July 12, 2012 Posted July 12, 2012 Are we any better. The last 2 "abroad" series...we were despensed completely & white washed..& its 0-8. Not even a draw. You want to discuss this seriously in a thread where people think Ajmal chucks when scientific evidence proves that you would need to be in 3 different places in real time to know if a bowler is straightening his arm? #KThxBossBhai
saurabhg Posted July 12, 2012 Posted July 12, 2012 so u guys thinks harbhajan singh's action is clean and he is not a chucker.lol. that means watever u guys have also achieved incuding the home series against australia 2001 was all fluke.beleive me if not for harbhajan singh aus would have won that series 3-0:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: and believe me if not for chuck-litharan ur test record u (SL) would not have half the wins you have...
siri Posted July 12, 2012 Posted July 12, 2012 and believe me if not for chuck-litharan ur test record u (SL) would not have half the wins you have... actually the name chucklitharan doesnt suit murali since he had given like 100 tests to prove that he doesnt throw.and all those 100 tests were closely monitored by australian experts who would have banned murali even after getting a just 0.000000001 percent prove that he is throwing.but only due to our murali ,ur chuckbhajan singh got away without giving even a single test .so u guys should thank murali for allow chuckbhajan to play cricket for india.and the amount of matches chuckbhajan has won for india is not that less compared to how much murali has won for us.u should remember a saying that a person living in glass houses shouldnot throw stones at others.:--D:--D
achilles Posted July 12, 2012 Posted July 12, 2012 Really now? They play 3 legitimate chuckers and they're passing judgements about Ajmal?
adi B Posted July 12, 2012 Posted July 12, 2012 lankans have the worst crybabies i their side,namely nanga nd jaya,played most of their matches with the biggest chucker in world, murali...they are known for disgracing sportsmanship- randiv,jaya-thirimane run out invident in cb series, yet they question our bowlers??? just chuck the feck up crybabies, u gonna get pwned as always from 21st
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now