Jump to content

Pakistan in India 2012-13...


Asim

Pakistan in India 2012-13...  

  1. 1.

    • 1.
      2
    • 2.
      2
    • 3.
      1
    • 4.
      7
    • 5.
      2
    • 6.
      3
    • Jadeja will open the batting and Chawla at no 4.
      11


Recommended Posts

Posted

Well 5th bowler theory has been tried and tested many times and always we've ended up with a bowler having a bad day. It was a bad day with bat, unless we get a genuine wicket taker we cant afford to lighten our batting.

Posted
That is an immensely idiotic comment.
I mean he should hv looked for wickets with his frontline bowlers rather than completing 5th bowler quota.if Pak played 50 over they were always gonna win
Posted

Yes , if u consider Dinda and ishant as wicket taking bowlers . Those two are crap. Ashwin bowled well but was unlucky today. We are going with 2 bowlers and 2 useless over-fillers :hitler:

Posted

Luck has dreaded India badly. Full day of rain, lost the toss to bat on a damp pitch, piss poor umpiring decisions, easiest catch drop then the no-ball. Although our batsman are more to blame who can't hold their piss for first 10 overs and despite knowing it is going to be tough were still pushing at the swinging ball.

Posted
India lost the Test series against England in Eden :wall: Now, they're about to lose an ODI series to Pakistan in Eden :wall: Panauti Stadium :finger:
Insha'Allah.
Posted
Yes , if u consider Dinda and ishant as wicket taking bowlers . Those two are crap. Ashwin bowled well but was unlucky today. We are going with 2 bowlers and 2 useless over-fillers :hitler:
at least they dint give runs. part timers like Yuvi and jaddu are freebies until its a slow turner or rank turner.
Posted

People giving up on UV to early. For the past 2 years he has been better than many of our specialist bowlers. And it's not like Jadeja is anything flash either.

Posted
at least they dint give runs. part timers like Yuvi and jaddu are freebies until its a slow turner or rank turner.
on helpful conditions,these guys r supposed to take wickets,not contain.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...