Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

M.Yousuf much better than Aloo IMO.Yousuf's batting was artistic,though Aloo was also good but he is way overhyped by Poyzz.

Posted
Pak was 41 for 5 and the genius Inzamam ul haq scored 135 against the best bowling attack in the cricket history.Best bowling attack deffecult pitch, bouncy track, bowl swinging, pressure, 5 wickets down, just inzi stand, I have never seen inning like that of sachin tendulkar out of 100 centuries. Thats how the best btasman should be not by runs and 100's. In that case D.Bradman is not great becasue he had less than 4000 runs.lol. .What's the point of scoring all those 100's still your team loses. which is the case with Sachin mostly. But Inzi has 19 match winning hundareds out of 25 he
:cantstop:
Posted
:cantstop:
:hysterical: Where did you get that gem from? :haha: Yup Inzi is so amazing that he blew Aussies and Saffers away with his supreme batting against quality pace attacks :giggle: The very fact the title is "Can Sachin play an innings like this" proves how SRT is leagues ahead of Inzi. After all would a SRT video be titled "Can Inzi play an innings like this?" coz we, and the whole world barring Pakistan, already know the answer :haha:
Posted
M.Yousuf much better than Aloo IMO.Yousuf's batting was artistic' date='though Aloo was also good but he is way overhyped by Poyzz.[/quote'] moyo was an ftb.
Posted
^^^ Add n those hilarious run outs and obstructing the field dismissals as well :haha: Plus his WC average along with his performances in 2003 WC were just epic :giggle:
scores in binary :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...