indiaregulator Posted November 14, 2012 Posted November 14, 2012 In test cricket. Couldn't find it, does anyone know?
saket123 Posted November 14, 2012 Posted November 14, 2012 In test cricket. Couldn't find it, does anyone know? Strike Rate is a term used for bowling.. is that what you are asking? His bowling strike rate in Tests? If so.. his bowling SR in Tests is 89.4
saneindian Posted November 14, 2012 Posted November 14, 2012 15553 runs in 28726 balls, gives him a SR of 54 in tests. Only innings for which his trike rate is not available is vs SL at Chandigarh in 1990 where he made 11. http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63548.html
saket123 Posted November 14, 2012 Posted November 14, 2012 15553 runs in 28726 balls' date=' gives him [b']a SR of 54 in tests. Only innings for which his trike rate is not available is vs SL at Chandigarh in 1990 where he made 11. http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63548.html aaah.. batting SR.. that's right!
indiaregulator Posted November 14, 2012 Author Posted November 14, 2012 :(( :(( I'm disappointed. I never watched Tendulkar in his prime but even my mates who have and who were all England fan's or Aussie fans aswell would say "Tendulkar in his prime could kill a test match in 2 hours." I was under the impression he was like a KP in terms of scoring runs. Still, 54 is very impressive but I was hoping it was something near enough 70 and that his recent more slow approach is due to his age more than anything.
Old guy Posted November 14, 2012 Posted November 14, 2012 :(( :(( I'm disappointed. I never watched Tendulkar in his prime but even my mates who have and who were all England fan's or Aussie fans aswell would say "Tendulkar in his prime could kill a test match in 2 hours." I was under the impression he was like a KP in terms of scoring runs. Still, 54 is very impressive but I was hoping it was something near enough 70 and that his recent more slow approach is due to his age more than anything. dude 70 is rare...sehwag would be near 80 i think at most and when he was consistent before i remember it was 72 or 73 see kp' avg...i think ponting might have strikerate in 60 maybe not can any one confirm this ?
JaFanatic Posted November 14, 2012 Posted November 14, 2012 dude 70 is rare...sehwag would be near 80 i think at most and when he was consistent before i remember it was 72 or 73 see kp' avg...i think ponting might have strikerate in 60 maybe not can any one confirm this ?58.75 it is!B->
SLICKR392 Posted November 15, 2012 Posted November 15, 2012 I think it's around 46. What? No, its above 50-55.
SLICKR392 Posted November 15, 2012 Posted November 15, 2012 :(( :(( I'm disappointed. I never watched Tendulkar in his prime but even my mates who have and who were all England fan's or Aussie fans aswell would say "Tendulkar in his prime could kill a test match in 2 hours." I was under the impression he was like a KP in terms of scoring runs. Still, 54 is very impressive but I was hoping it was something near enough 70 and that his recent more slow approach is due to his age more than anything. dude 70 is rare...sehwag would be near 80 i think at most and when he was consistent before i remember it was 72 or 73 see kp' avg...i think ponting might have strikerate in 60 maybe not can any one confirm this ? Yeah...70 is more over an extra ordinary S/R in Test cricket. I think even Gayle has a S/R under 60. CI shows KP has over 60. Talking about all these guys -Viru :hatsoff:
Executioner Posted November 15, 2012 Posted November 15, 2012 tamim will be in that list soon enough, he scored 72 from 71 balls in his recent innings
carnish Posted November 15, 2012 Posted November 15, 2012 Christ Gayle stats are bit shocking Not really ... he plays test cricket completely differently than you see him playing in LOIs. Anyone who has seen Gayle bat in last 10 years knows that Gayle plays a lot of dot balls in between his hard shots.
indiaregulator Posted November 15, 2012 Author Posted November 15, 2012 Gayle's problem is that he cannot rotate strike.
vvvslaxman Posted November 16, 2012 Posted November 16, 2012 Given the form of Kohli and "form" of Sachin we need a little swapping. Kohli at no.4 and Sachin at no.5. I reckon this will benefit both.
vamos_rafa Posted November 16, 2012 Posted November 16, 2012 Given the form of Kohli and "form" of Sachin we need a little swapping. Kohli at no.4 and Sachin at no.5. I reckon this will benefit both. Totally agree.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now