jalebi_bhai Posted July 31, 2013 Posted July 31, 2013 Swamy is not some ordinary person. He has done a lot of research and highly educated. All he does is, he questions everybody. Bitterly. True.....
diga Posted July 31, 2013 Posted July 31, 2013 Swamy is not some ordinary person. He has done a lot of research and highly educated. All he does is, he questions everybody. Bitterly. Tambram
Crookbond Posted July 31, 2013 Posted July 31, 2013 Swamy is not some ordinary person. He has done a lot of research and highly educated. All he does is, he questions everybody. Bitterly. True..... I am fine with his skepticism but some of his remarks are pathetic, his academic background notwithstanding. Of course, it appeals to some people because they enjoy Congress bashing but will turn the other way once Swamy starts commenting on BJP. Digvijay is just an offline version of an Internet troll.
Detonator Posted July 31, 2013 Posted July 31, 2013 Tambram yeah :cantstop: I am fine with his skepticism but some of his remarks are pathetic' date=' his academic background notwithstanding. Of course, it appeals to some people because they enjoy Congress bashing but will turn the other way once Swamy starts commenting on BJP. Digvijay is just an offline version of an Internet troll.[/quote'] Well, everyone isn't perfect. He behaves like a jerk sometimes, and his questions to BJP are also good and should be asked. On some occations, even his congress bashing looks way too much. But he isn't as bad as Digvijay. Not even close. :agree:
BeautifulGame Posted July 31, 2013 Posted July 31, 2013 Lol Swamy has always been a deluded joker. Much worse than Dig Vijay Singh. Wonder how the BJP fans who admire Vajpayee defend Swamy.Do they know the amount vitrol and accusations he has thrown at Vajpayee in the past. http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?205236 Small sample
Crookbond Posted July 31, 2013 Posted July 31, 2013 Well, everyone isn't perfect. He behaves like a jerk sometimes, and his questions to BJP are also good and should be asked. On some occations, even his congress bashing looks way too much. But he isn't as bad as Digvijay. Not even close. :agree: Perfect? A Harvard graduate calling homosexual tendencies a "mental disorder" comes in the line of being racist. Perfection is far off. Lol Swamy has always been a deluded joker. Much worse than Dig Vijay Singh. Wonder how the BJP fans who admire Vajpayee defend Swamy.Do they know the amout vitrol and accusations he has thrown at Vajpayee in the past. http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?205236 Small sample Who wants to read facts? As long as it suits my theory of supremacy, anyone on my bandwagon is welcome be it Swamy or Bin Laden.
Detonator Posted July 31, 2013 Posted July 31, 2013 Perfect? A Harvard graduate calling homosexual tendencies a "mental disorder" comes in the line of being racist. Perfection is far off. :WTF: I never knew this. Now I don't have nothing but to agree with you about swamy. But sometimes he makes sense.
Detonator Posted July 31, 2013 Posted July 31, 2013 Lol Swamy has always been a deluded joker. Much worse than Dig Vijay Singh. Wonder how the BJP fans who admire Vajpayee defend Swamy.Do they know the amount vitrol and accusations he has thrown at Vajpayee in the past. http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?205236 Small sample BJP fans? Many, including me, are congress haters.
diga Posted July 31, 2013 Posted July 31, 2013 I wonder about the conversations Swamy would have with Srini about his son:--D
adi B Posted July 31, 2013 Posted July 31, 2013 Lol Swamy has always been a deluded joker. Much worse than Dig Vijay Singh. Wonder how the BJP fans who admire Vajpayee defend Swamy.Do they know the amount vitrol and accusations he has thrown at Vajpayee in the past. http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?205236 Small sample who defended swamy here?why so insecurity among ya all congress blokes that u bring in ABV`s example?
Sachin=GOD Posted July 31, 2013 Posted July 31, 2013 Keep the discussion about Pappu :hitler: start another thread about Swamy if you guys want to discuss him.
BeautifulGame Posted July 31, 2013 Posted July 31, 2013 who defended swamy here?why so insecurity among ya all congress blokes that u bring in ABV`s example? Yeah sure:hysterical: The typical ICF way , call him congress supporter if he dont agree with u on any point about congress or in support of BJP.
BeautifulGame Posted July 31, 2013 Posted July 31, 2013 As for why i bought Vajpayee argument , simply to show that Swamy has a history of making deluded comments and anyone taking him or his acquisition seriously doesnt know much about him.
FischerTal Posted July 31, 2013 Posted July 31, 2013 As for why i bought Vajpayee argument ' date=' simply to show that Swamy has a history of making deluded comments and anyone taking him or his acquisition seriously doesnt know much about him.[/quote'] swamy has always been a joker.... the only reason he gained importance is because people in media thought he had enough evidence to go after chidambaram in 2G scam..... after that the media stopped caring about what he does.... he occassionally appears on the newshour to rant as well, but i admit that i love when he fights with the biggest moron, sanjay jha :phehehe:
Detonator Posted July 31, 2013 Posted July 31, 2013 As for why i bought Vajpayee argument ' date=' simply to show that Swamy has a history of making deluded comments and anyone taking him or his acquisition seriously doesnt know much about him.[/quote'] Support for BJP and discussion about Swamy doesn't overlap. He may be stupid, but he rises a lot of questions. Every politician must be questioned continuously for the each things they do, be it a stupid question or something that makes sense. Someone should be there to challange them. I just pointed out Swamy was doing this.
Crookbond Posted July 31, 2013 Posted July 31, 2013 Support for BJP and discussion about Swamy doesn't overlap. He may be stupid, but he rises a lot of questions. Every politician must be questioned continuously for the each things they do, be it a stupid question or something that makes sense. Someone should be there to challange them. I just pointed out Swamy was doing this. You are right but you forget that people are using his educational qualifications to give credibility to his accusations. The counter examples are to show that Swamy's Harvard qualification is not a necessary and sufficient condition to show credibility on his arguments. His comments must be viewed on basis of facts and not rumors or muddled figures.
adi B Posted July 31, 2013 Posted July 31, 2013 Yeah sure:hysterical: The typical ICF way , call him congress supporter if he dont agree with u on any point about congress or in support of BJP. mate,u used the term "BJP fan" when there was no need to,nobody defended swamy hell bent,some guys here here only said he has a good academic background and is better than diggy,how is this defending swamy? i myself admitted swamy`s a nutjob
Detonator Posted August 1, 2013 Posted August 1, 2013 You are right but you forget that people are using his educational qualifications to give credibility to his accusations. That's me :embaressed_smile: The counter examples are to show that Swamy's Harvard qualification is not a necessary and sufficient condition to show credibility on his arguments. His comments must be viewed on basis of facts and not rumors or muddled figures. If facts and credibility is considered, India is a developed, non-corrupt country and the poverty has been drastically reduced.
diga Posted August 1, 2013 Posted August 1, 2013 Rahul Gandhi says party spokespersons need prior permission before going for TV chat shows, inquiry if someone speaks out of line: PTI Elections are nearby??? Damage control
Crookbond Posted August 1, 2013 Posted August 1, 2013 If facts and credibility is considered, India is a developed, non-corrupt country and the poverty has been drastically reduced. Dude, context!!!! I meant that Swamy's claims can not be considered serious unless he provides a credible source/documents for them. They are and will remain conspiracy theories, his educational background and historical comments are secondary.
Recommended Posts