MCcricket Posted March 8, 2013 Author Posted March 8, 2013 It is a surprise our selectors don't even know along with the coach that a certain player or bowler picked is having major flaws in his action, Mithun, Ishant, Unadkat were picked despite that instead of doing good it is hurting them n same with R P
Old guy Posted March 8, 2013 Posted March 8, 2013 It is a surprise our selectors don't even know along with the coach that a certain player or bowler picked is having major flaws in his action' date=' Mithun, Ishant, Unadkat were picked despite that instead of doing good it is hurting them n same with R P[/quote'] unadkat was too young he is much much better then likes of mithun and vinay ,looked promising to me this season:two_thumbs_up:
Dumbbells Posted March 8, 2013 Posted March 8, 2013 Unadkat is a **** bowler with a **** bowling action. He looks like a veggie with no pace or aggression.
Old guy Posted March 8, 2013 Posted March 8, 2013 Unadkat is a **** bowler with a **** bowling action. He looks like a veggie with no pace or aggression. siddle is a veggie too u know
Dumbbells Posted March 8, 2013 Posted March 8, 2013 siddle is a veggie too u know :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Phaaast bowler.
Texan Posted March 9, 2013 Posted March 9, 2013 Lol On s serious note what a poor sports body BCCI is, constantly letting down crickets 1 billion fans, shoddy management,politics, selections. I can add to this list... Avoiding paying taxes Providing shoddy experience to spectators at stadiums Gutless in handling senior cricketers Money-minded Ohhh... I can go on and on :winky:
Texan Posted March 9, 2013 Posted March 9, 2013 no 138K' date=' clocked in U19 world cup. He was quicker in U19 WC than the one test he played.[/quote'] lol :cantstop: Slowed down even before playing test cricket. If he was given 10 - 12 Tests, he would have bowled at Ganguly's pace then :giggle:
Texan Posted March 9, 2013 Posted March 9, 2013 Unadkats action and bowling was so bad anyone could see mediocricity all over then l What was shocking was that Dhoni had picked this guy ahead of Umesh Yadav. That speaks volumes about the potential-spotting talent of our dear captain!
rkt.india Posted March 9, 2013 Posted March 9, 2013 lol :cantstop: Slowed down even before playing test cricket. If he was given 10 - 12 Tests, he would have bowled at Ganguly's pace then :giggle: May be cool conditions in NZ helped him then, but he is bowling very well right now. He is quicker than what he was in SA now. He did bowl well against Mumbai and MP in live matches. He is improving and he is still one of the youngest of the new pacers. But only gripe is, he is still too thin, needs go to gym and have some muscles on his body like Yadav.
MCcricket Posted March 9, 2013 Author Posted March 9, 2013 Unadkat then was so mediocre he wouldn't even get a chance in county b team let alone national side, Dhoni is an idi&@! Fletcher his peon, selectors r ****&&@@
Texan Posted March 9, 2013 Posted March 9, 2013 Unadkat then was so mediocre he wouldn't even get a chance in county b team let alone national side' date=' Dhoni is an idi&@! Fletcher his peon, selectors r ****&&@@[/quote'] Agreed. I was shocked to see Umesh omitted that day. But then, knowing Dhoni's choice of players for Tests (Raina, Yuvraj, etc.), I guess I shouldn't have been shocked.
rkt.india Posted March 9, 2013 Posted March 9, 2013 Unadkat then was so mediocre he wouldn't even get a chance in county b team let alone national side' date=' Dhoni is an idi&@! Fletcher his peon, selectors r ****&&@@[/quote'] Kirsten was the coach then, not Fletcher.
MCcricket Posted March 9, 2013 Author Posted March 9, 2013 I'm talking about present coach who is useless,Dhoni is dumb
Vilander Posted March 10, 2013 Posted March 10, 2013 csk is a batting side, always needs good local bowlers because it depends on australian fast bowlers, if Pankaj gets into csk he has a good chance to impress dhoni.
bharat297 Posted March 10, 2013 Posted March 10, 2013 Pankaj Singh is nearly 28 now. He doesn't have many years before he becomes "too old" to be picked. It's stupid that he hasn't been selected yet. Pankaj Singh, Umesh Yadav, Bhuvaneshwar Kumar and Shami Ahmed would be the 4 quicks I'd pick for the squad for South Africa, with Sreesanth as a backup (due to his impressive record in South Africa)
FischerTal Posted March 10, 2013 Posted March 10, 2013 Pankaj Singh is nearly 28 now. He doesn't have many years before he becomes "too old" to be picked. It's stupid that he hasn't been selected yet. Pankaj Singh, Umesh Yadav, Bhuvaneshwar Kumar and Shami Ahmed would be the 4 quicks I'd pick for the squad for South Africa, with Sreesanth as a backup (due to his impressive record in South Africa) Pankaj Singh will never get picked as long as Lambu is there. The cold reality.
Texan Posted March 11, 2013 Posted March 11, 2013 Pankaj Singh, Umesh Yadav, Bhuvaneshwar Kumar and Shami Ahmed would be the 4 quicks I'd pick for the squad for South Africa, with Sreesanth as a backup The only change I would make to that line-up is pick Praveen Kumar instead of Sreesanth. PK has been prolific in Test cricket in the limited opportunities he's got and was a rare success in England among all the other failures.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now