Jump to content

Srini :hail: CSK :hail:


Recommended Posts

Posted
Nopes' date=' Ravi Shastri and Mark Taylor are also a part of that committee and haven't stopped commentating :(([/quote'] :((
Posted

As long as he is not in commentary box who cares? Was Tim May being FICA chief made any difference? Other contestant is Whingakkara :phehehe: Who gives a sh**?

Posted

Meeting room mein kisi ne pankhe da regulator 4 se 5 kar dena hai aur laxman sivaramakrishnan yeh gaya khidki ke bahar udta hua. :hehe:

Posted
he'll leave commentary then?:woot:
Nopes' date=' Ravi Shastri and Mark Taylor are also a part of that committee and haven't stopped commentating :(([/quote'] :((
Posted

Sivaramakrishnan banks on experience to contribute to ICC panel http://www.espncricinfo.com/indian-premier-league-2013/content/story/634390.html Laxman Sivaramakrishnan has responded to criticism of his election to the ICC's cricket committee by pointing to his 33-year association with the game, first as an international cricketer and then as a commentator. Sivaramakrishnan was elected over FICA president Tim May in a hotly contested election that saw hectic lobbying by both sides. "I am sure there are a lot of cricket-related matters that are going to be discussed," Sivaramakrishnan told CNN IBN. "And I think I have been around for a long time. I've been associated with the game for around 33 years and I have a lot of contribution to make." He was non-committal about the controversial Decision Review System (DRS) issue. The BCCI has been opposing ICC's attempts to introduce DRS, which was recommended by the cricket committee in 2011. "I don't know whether it is a part of the agenda. If it is on the agenda, then we will look into the matter. I am not the sole person who controls the committee, I just have an opinion," he said. "I will say whatever I feel about the DRS in the meeting and it's the final consensus of the committee whether to take the decision to implement DRS or leave it optional. So, it's not entirely my call." He has also responded to charges of proximity to the Chennai Super Kings franchise by saying his association with its parent company, India Cements - owned by BCCI president N Srinivasan - goes back 16 years, well before the franchise was created. "I am not an employee of Chennai Super Kings," Sivaramakrishnan said. "I have been an employee of India Cements for the last 16 years and India Cements owns Chennai Super Kings. That has happened in the last six years. I have served India Cements as an employee and played cricket for them and I see no attachment with the Super Kings at all. In fact, I have done nothing at all for the Super Kings."

Posted
And what does Srini/CSK have to do with this? :giggle:
Shiva has been an employee of India Cements (not yet a VP though) for the last 16 years, India Cements is owned by Srini and owns CSK. Connection to hai bhai
Posted

Harsha Bhogle ‏@bhogleharsha organisations doing what is right for them as old as history itself;empires weren't built on concern for what is right for the less powerful Harsha Bhogle ‏@bhogleharsha there is no cultural stereotype for organisations doing what is right; the british empire did it, the u.s. does it, the oil cartel did...

Posted

Alternative Cricket ‏@AltCricket Boards fight tooth and nail to reach the top, and then expected to give back under the pretence of 'equality'? In a utopia, perhaps.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...