Jump to content

Feel sorry for Sachin


zubinpepsi

Recommended Posts

So much so for name calling. I say again (and hopefully you shall understand it better now). With Sachin in the team we did NOT win, we Sachin OUT we did. Samjha? Good now get lost. xxx
Lurks , very disappointed with that reaction. Sachin was the best batsman in the odis against england and the quickest too.
Link to comment

This speculation about Sachin in 20/20's isnt just speculation by oppurtunistic fans. Its not like we got eliminated in the first round and we are all saying - " If only Sachin was there..." If Hayden can be among the top scorers , so can Sachin. He isnt the worst fielder either. But its a good thing Ganguly didnt play.

Link to comment

who cares? we won, that's all should matter. feel sorry for sachin yes. but don't speculate that we would have won if he had played. cause if he had played, someone would have to sit out and no it can't be a convinient person who didn't score in a match. plus he isn't exactly to known to perform in grand finals as we lost like a gazillion of them with him in the team.

Link to comment
This speculation about Sachin in 20/20's isnt just speculation by oppurtunistic fans. Its not like we got eliminated in the first round and we are all saying - " If only Sachin was there..." If Hayden can be among the top scorers , so can Sachin. He isnt the worst fielder either. But its a good thing Ganguly didnt play.
MM, its wrong to pick ganguly out. He is as clean a striker of the cricket ball as anyone else. His lofted drives over cover and huge sixes will always make a difference ot the team....... one aspect which could be a problem , is fielding. But hell, we could always substitute with dinesh karthik in that department... ganguly has been bowling pretty decently these days...
Link to comment
who cares? we won, that's all should matter. feel sorry for sachin yes. but don't speculate that we would have won if he had played. cause if he had played, someone would have to sit out and no it can't be a convinient person who didn't score in a match. plus he isn't exactly to known to perform in grand finals as we lost like a gazillion of them with him in the team.
To say " Who cares ? we won !" is just plain dumb. So , would you have called for Sachin's entry into the team had we lost ? Bear in mind , its just a matter of balls between glory and pain in 20/20. India won , great .. but to say we cant question anything is just not acceptable.
Link to comment
MM, its wrong to pick ganguly out. He is as clean a striker of the cricket ball as anyone else. His lofted drives over cover and huge sixes will always make a difference ot the team....... one aspect which could be a problem , is fielding. But hell, we could always substitute with dinesh karthik in that department... ganguly has been bowling pretty decently these days...
Nope , even in ODIs , ganguly's hitting has been one-dimenensional, either over mid-wicket or cover. Even if scored at a RR of 100 , that wont have been enough. It was a good thing he didnt play.
Link to comment
He sounded over the moon when interviewed on IBN. I think he is the most passionate Indian cricket fan there is! He was overjoyed.
yes... he kept on talkingggggg.. he sounded very delighteddddd said hes always with the team doesnt matter where he is.. and he lll b always with the team..... WTG Sachinnnnnn. U ROCK!!!!!!!!1:two_thumbs_up:
Link to comment
Nope ' date=' even in ODIs , ganguly's hitting has been one-dimenensional, either over mid-wicket or cover. Even if scored at a RR of 100 , that wont have been enough. It was a good thing he didnt play.[/quote'] what about his square drives, his classy off drives and flicks,, one major thing against him is the pull / hook. But if thats your case to point , a lot of players are one dimensional and still have a huge presence....i guess its about how good you are in that dimension...i feel ganguly would have made his presence felt...
Link to comment
what about his square drives' date=' his classy off drives and flicks,, one major thing against him is the pull / hook. But if thats your case to point , a lot of players are one dimensional and still have a huge presence....i guess its about how good you are in that dimension...i feel ganguly would have made his presence felt...[/quote'] His fielding is just too pathetic anyways.. he would have been a BIG liability.
Link to comment

This is not the time to feel sorry folks. Its time to celebrate. I know how the three warriors feel. They have my sympathies. But am afraid we may not have won with these three on the field. The biggest reason we won this tourney is because of our approach to each game. Not to mention the running between the wickets and fielding. These little things made a great impact in close games.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...