Jump to content

Sreesanth, Chandilla and Ankit Chavan arrested for spot fixing in IPL


Recommended Posts

Posted
Some issues here, Firstly how exactly can a cricketer control their bowling? Like when to give runs or not give runs? I find it seriously stupid that now the police are commenting on how a bowler gave runs purposefully. You can bowl good and yet get smashed, similarly bowl poor, and get wickets. So where exactly is the spot fixing? If it was a no-ball or wide, it's understandable. But giving purposeful sixes/fours make little sense. If that is the case, let's doubt every ball that goes to the boundary.
Err, the simple reason that the number of runs was agreed BEFOREHAND and they have the transcripts of these players agreeing to that and showing signals for the same You do know you can bet on number of runs conceded by a bowler in an over right? And the categories will be something like less than 6, 6 to 10, 10 to 14 and over 14, etc
Posted
Please don't make fixing accusations other than those who are named without proof of their involvement.
no one is doing ndtv started rumor over tait and even media asked police about it
Posted

There is no way one can guarantee 14 runs of an over unless the batsmen are also in the deal. Wickets fall over full tosses as well. So if a wicket gets lost at 1st ball which new batsman would be willing to hit 14 runs of his first 5 balls irrespective of the quality of the bowling?

Posted
but they were giving signals to bookies' date=' so conspiracy can be established[/quote'] Signals for what? Now, if I even strach my head, I need to be analyzed? These signals simply is not enough. Many other players take time in warm ups and later do get smashed, will you doubt them? Will any bowler who gets smashed and does something different ( things like touching his head or using towels) be considered as spot fixers
Posted
Didn't get any leads from IPL/BCCI. It was us who told them - Police. So miuch for anti-corruption teams
yep..they informed ipl babus not the other way around:giggle:
Posted
There is no way one can guarantee 14 runs of an over unless the batsmen are also in the deal. Wickets fall over full tosses as well. So if a wicket gets lost at 1st ball which new batsman would be willing to hit 14 runs of his first 5 balls irrespective of the quality of the bowling?
Not all deals work in a picture perfect manner. They're just showing the ones that worked out.
Posted
There is no way one can guarantee 14 runs of an over unless the batsmen are also in the deal. Wickets fall over full tosses as well. So if a wicket gets lost at 1st ball which new batsman would be willing to hit 14 runs of his first 5 balls irrespective of the quality of the bowling?
Yes, so its not a guarantee but a gamble. Bookies too lose money and is such cases the players who couldn't deliver have to return money. No investment in the world is 100% gauranteed. For example, they showed the Sreesanth over where he agreed to give over 14 but could give only 13 runs so Sreesanth did fail

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...