Jump to content

india are right about DRS


Recommended Posts

Posted

clarke, hughes, watson, all not out. 50/50 at best. hotspot isn't even catching the edges. there is absolutely no consistency in its use. a decision that was given out on one day is not out on another. the 'umpire's call' thing is such a crock of ****, basically makes a decision come down to how the umpire 'feels'. the english, who were whining about trott, will now celebrate DRS even tho the whole system is such a joke. umpiring is **** these days, but is there any difference in the accuracy of their decisions and whatever you get from DRS? heres a picture proving what a crock of **** the 'umpire's call' is - the top one is finn, the bottom watson. BPD0OYUCQAA8Ynd.png

Posted
I dont agree with india's stance on DRS but this umpires call is a load of bullsiht' date='either you trust the UDRS completely or just chuck it but dont go halfway with it.[/quote'] BCCI is right. Hotspot failed in England-India series 2011, Hawkeye in the SL-Aus series in 2011 and both these technology failed in this game. DRS is a farce.
Posted
I dont agree with india's stance on DRS but this umpires call is a load of bullsiht' date='either you trust the UDRS completely or just chuck it but dont go halfway with it.[/quote'] india and more specifically, MSD's stance has always been: 1. DRS isn't fool-proof. can't use tech if not fool-proof. 2. improve quality of umpiring instead. hard to argue with either point after seeing DRS screw ups on this tour and on previous ones as well. DRS hasnt empowered umpires, its weakened them. so how does having DRS help when the decisions are still questionable? how is the UMPIRE'S CALL an improvement on just having the umpire make a split second decision?? its easy to say that you can only use it for howlers, but players will always be tempted to review anything they have a strong feeling about in the heat of the moment... here is what dhoni said before the aussie tour:
Posted

TV replay is sufficient to eliminate howlers. Rest of the decisions should be left to umpires. If marginal decisions dont go your way, its no big deal. Teams should accept that and move on. Hawk eye, Hot spot just complicate the game further, create more controversies and they are not improving decision making.

Posted

Even though i am supporting england in the ashes, i dont know how michael clarke was given out. did not see any edge there on hot spot.

Posted
Even though i am supporting england in the ashes, i dont know how michael clarke was given out. did not see any edge there on hot spot.
There was little spot. Could be few dust particles sliding of the bat? :dontknow:
Posted
Even though i am supporting england in the ashes, i dont know how michael clarke was given out. did not see any edge there on hot spot.
according to england's legion of impartial and neutral 'ekshpert' commentary panelists, the tv ump 'HEARD' the nick. :haha::haha::haha: CAN YOU IMAGINE if this happened in a test played in india and if the receiving team was england/australia? you would hear the same old, 'INDIA ARE EEEEEEVIL, BCCI ARE SO CORRUPT' bullshit. the reality is that DRS is a crock of ****.
Posted
There was little spot. Could be few dust particles sliding of the bat? :dontknow:
I saw that incident plenty of times. Did not see anything on hot spot. @manny I thought you cant use snicko as its not part of the official DRS guideline? Only the sky experts are defending it. I was listening to TMS on BBC radio and Aggers (Agnew) and Boycott both said Clarke was not out and the third umpire had fluffed it. This is why i never listen to the sky people. They are chavs. Today i watched skysports online via sky go and had my digital radio on for the commentary.
Posted
I saw that incident plenty of times. Did not see anything on hot spot. @manny I thought you cant use snicko as its not part of the official DRS guideline? Only the sky experts are defending it. I was listening to TMS on BBC radio and Aggers (Agnew) and Boycott both said Clarke was not out and the third umpire had fluffed it. This is why i never listen to the sky people. They are chavs. Today i watched skysports online via sky go and had my digital radio on for the commentary.
Hmmmm. Has anyone got the video or a shot of that hot spot?
Posted

all i saw was a big band which was discolored. Did not see a specific bright spot where the ball had clipped the bat.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...