srij Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 i know about the meaning of ASHLIL and many other Hindi words ... :--D and about my sentence, i asked this to other poster, why r u feeling butt-hurt ??? :icflove: IT CAN BE PERCEIVED WHO GOT BUTT-HURT ,NOW THOUGHT
KeyboardWarrior Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 Take rakhi sawant too :protest: IT CAN BE PERCEIVED WHO GOT BUTT-HURT ' date='NOW THOUGHT [/quote'] :omg: :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
srij Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 :omg: :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: see post no 44 and then keep :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical: for your judiciousness
KeyboardWarrior Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 ^^^ Bro, i can understand ur situation after getting Butt-Hurt... :icflove: see post # 58 ... :cantstop:
Old guy Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 ^^^ Bro, i can understand ur situation after getting Butt-Hurt... :icflove: see post # 58 ... :cantstop: why are u interested in some one's butt?
srij Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 ^^^ Bro, i can understand ur situation after getting Butt-Hurt... :icflove: see post # 58 ... :cantstop: you certainly capable of understanding these terms like ass, butt etc may u are recently molested,may be yesterday
KeyboardWarrior Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 why are u interested in some one's butt? i have no problem with some ones butt, but srij bro taking my response very hard... :hysterical: you certainly capable of understanding these terms like ass' date=' butt etc may u are recently molested,may be yesterday[/quote'] bro,i didnt know that you hurt that much .... :hysterical:
Sajid_Rana Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 Akmal vs Sachin statistical comparison, both after 76 ODIs: Great stats Asim. This confirms Pak fan claims that Umar Akmal is seriously underrated. Also your stats are not completely fair because you have included Sachin home games on dead pattas as well compare to Umar only away games. Here is link showing Tendulkar first 75 away games and the stats are even more ordinary compare to your stats. http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/player/35320.html?class=2;filter=advanced;home_or_away=2;orderby=default;spanmax1=18+Mar+2000;spanval1=span;template=results;type=allround :omg: This shows even a genius like Sachin would struggle if he only plays away all the time like U Akmal. Umar is also handicapped by his captain for not coming up the order or even opening like Sachin who has no excuse to have such poor record which spans over the whole decade of 90s when he was supposed to be best ODI bat as per Indian fans.
Clarke Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 @Clark: I have never seen any video of Waqar where he bowled consistently over 90mph and even requested for any such videos but none of you guys managed to post that. He was a mid to high 130k bowler with some occassionally 140s same as that of Vinny legend Kumar but he was quicker through the air unlike the legend. Dude, at least read his cricinfo profile: The man who really put the reverse into swing. Waqar Younis bucked the 1980s trend of pitching fast and short by pitching fast and full. Not an obvious recipe for success until you factor in prodigious late inswing, which was designed to smash into the base of leg stump or the batsman's toes. In his youth, he was one of the fastest ever. Not just plain fast, one of the fastest ever! Get a grip before you make any further crazy comparisons.
Old guy Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 Dude, at least read his cricinfo profile: Not just plain fast, one of the fastest ever! Get a grip before you make any further crazy comparisons. i have never seen him bowl sadly atleast not in prime and statistically he is just awesome during that period...jsut how quick was he compared to modern quicks like brett lee and tait? not tlaking about skill but speed only
Clarke Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 i have never seen him bowl sadly atleast not in prime and statistically he is just awesome during that period...jsut how quick was he compared to modern quicks like brett lee and tait? not tlaking about skill but speed only That's a debate in itself since speed guns weren't the norm, but when I first talked about cricket around 20 yrs back, phassstt generally brought up two names among the then current players, Donald & Waqar.
maniac Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 That's a debate in itself since speed guns weren't the norm' date=' but when I first talked about cricket around[b'] 20 yrs back, phassstt generally brought up two names among the then current players, Donald & Waqar. Well maybe it is to do with perception too...I mean As a kid,if someone would bowl fast and look menancing at the same time,people would call him Ambrose Ki Aulaad,but later in life I realised Ambrose was mostly 130-135K bowler for most of his career.
Old guy Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 That's a debate in itself since speed guns weren't the norm' date=' but when I first talked about cricket around 20 yrs back, phassstt generally brought up two names among the then current players, Donald & Waqar.[/quote'] ok...i guess reverse swing made him look even faster..and donald might be bit like steyn i dont even care about pace its just that i always thought lee and akthar were the quickest ever in tests and odis while tait was very quick for 2 years tait actually looked very quick while watching from stadium...strange part is ryan harris was looking just as quick and making batsmen jump :P
Old guy Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 Well maybe it is to do with perception too...I mean As a kid' date='if someone would bowl fast and look menancing at the same time,people would call him Ambrose Ki Aulaad,but later in life I realised Ambrose was mostly 130-135K bowler for most of his career.[/quote'] yeah if u jsut move the ball at 140 k it looks very hard for batsman and if some one is expert at mixing lengths with control its even harder as batsman cant just play before ball is delivered
Clarke Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 Well maybe it is to do with perception too...I mean As a kid' date='if someone would bowl fast and look menancing at the same time,people would call him Ambrose Ki Aulaad,but later in life I realised Ambrose was mostly 130-135K bowler for most of his career.[/quote'] You don't get labelled as one of the quickest ever simply based on perception. Donald wasn't like Steyn, he was ferociously quick. He worked with raw pace and made many a solid batsman jump on flat tracks without any movement off the wicket. Edit: Realised this thread was about SRT, so there is a famous dismissal where he's beaten for pace against white lightning. That's enough reason to declare he made other fast bowlers look not so fast :)
Old guy Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 You don't get labelled as one of the quickest ever simply based on perception. Donald wasn't like Steyn, he was ferociously quick. He worked with raw pace and made many a solid batsman jump on flat tracks without any movement off the wicket. Edit: Realised this thread was about SRT, so there is a famous dismissal where he's beaten for pace against white lightning. That's enough reason to declare he made other fast bowlers look not so fast :) ur lucky to be able to see them in prime :)
maniac Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 ur lucky to be able to see them in prime :) I don't think so a lot of Indians like me have watched a lot of Waqar Younis at his fastest,Hence the bias. Donald in a heartbeat I would say,he was express. Waqar was not part of the 92 WC squad and India obviously didn't play Pak a lot in the 90's and in the early 90's especially the time when Waqar was supposed to be at his fastest,there wasn't as much coverage of cricket not including India. Apart from the odd Sharjah game,the first real glimpse of Waqar and beleive me I am not biased when I say this was during the famous 96 Q.F game. Clarke can you tell me a series before the 96 Q.F where you consistently saw Waqar bowl and be unplayable and Fast? There might have been the odd Sharjah game and the Eng series where Pak were definetely a better team but everytime I saw them bowl together,I thought Wasim was more threatening(and this has nothing to do with the Sterotype of Indian love for Wasim),I kinda hated him more back then :giggle:
Clarke Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 ^ You're somewhat right, I/we didn't catch as much of Waqar in his prime. I saw him in the 92 Eng series and some of the 93 series against WI. The calypso boys were quite a team.
Asim Posted September 3, 2013 Author Posted September 3, 2013 i have never seen him bowl sadly atleast not in prime and statistically he is just awesome during that period...jsut how quick was he compared to modern quicks like brett lee and tait? not tlaking about skill but speed only If we talk about speed only, he was simply fastest of his time and one of the fastest ever... No2Nz4R4HUs xWM96eznN-A jg5It5gVBQs E5Em0LEbhPQ
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now