G_B_ Posted October 31, 2013 Posted October 31, 2013 Follow barcelona and have logo for cause. they are paid $40 million by the qatar foundation. How is that them following the cause? Yes before that they had uniceif (i think) but they gave up that as they struggled to pay the salaries of players. Lets not go the Barcelona way. Upto their eyeballs in debt.
zep1706 Posted October 31, 2013 Posted October 31, 2013 Do the Guptas own Sahara? And I believe they stay in South Africa? Both Saharas are owned completely different people with no connections with each other.
diga Posted October 31, 2013 Posted October 31, 2013 Is it not Star Sports? The word on the street is that SA tour is curtailed as the new sponsor starts from Jan 1 & Ten sports owns the rights of SA tour
Cricketics Posted October 31, 2013 Posted October 31, 2013 they are paid $40 million by the qatar foundation. How is that them following the cause? Yes before that they had uniceif (i think) but they gave up that as they struggled to pay the salaries of players. Lets not go the Barcelona way. Upto their eyeballs in debt. Lol Rofl. Don't worry. India will never go that way beause we have a BCCI, paiso ke bhooke bhikmangi log. You think they will do charity work :)
Cricketics Posted October 31, 2013 Posted October 31, 2013 Also I would like Nike to have some compeition. Right now, just because of it's name it's being considered great sponsor. They haven't really been that special the way we would think for such a top brnad like NIKE. I hope Lacoste comes in competition to them and ask BCCI to let them make it's jersey. Lacoste will do better job than NiKE. I can bet. Lacoste is already sponsoring Somdev Devvarman too. Love their jerseys which they made for Roddick and Isner.
G_B_ Posted October 31, 2013 Posted October 31, 2013 Also I would like Nike to have some compeition. Right now, just because of it's name it's being considered great sponsor. They haven't really been that special the way we would think for such a top brnad like NIKE. I hope Lacoste comes in competition to them and ask BCCI to let them make it's jersey. Lacoste will do better job than NiKE. I can bet. Lacoste is already sponsoring Somdev Devvarman too. Love their jerseys which they made for Roddick and Isner. dude you know how small Lacoste is as a company? Its a niche market which concentrates on sports like tennis. (Lacoste was a French tennis player) There are effectively 3 options. Nike Addidas or Puma. You can do for smaller manufacturers into the cricketing segment like Canterbury. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canterbury_of_New_Zealand But they in no way have the capacity or money to bid for the right to bid for the BCCI sports jersey. If anything Canterbury have been pushed out by Nike and Adidas when it comes to the cricketing market.
Zero_Unit Posted October 31, 2013 Posted October 31, 2013 CAn't say i remember INdia without SAHARA on our jerseys.
Cricketics Posted October 31, 2013 Posted October 31, 2013 CAn't say i remember INdia without SAHARA on our jerseys. Wills?
Cricketics Posted October 31, 2013 Posted October 31, 2013 Also I liked Aasics in 1999 world cup. They made the sponsors for all countries in 1999 world ucp.
Malcolm Merlyn Posted October 31, 2013 Posted October 31, 2013 Tata would be great.But i doubt they would bid. Airtel is the realistic bidder.May be Vodafone???
Jersey #10 Posted November 1, 2013 Author Posted November 1, 2013 Tata would be great.But i doubt they would bid. Airtel is the realistic bidder.May be Vodafone??? Vodafone would be terrible. I don't want any britt company sponsoring team india. :whack: Samsung on Chelsea looks awesome
CG Posted November 1, 2013 Posted November 1, 2013 they are paid $40 million by the qatar foundation. How is that them following the cause? Yes before that they had uniceif (i think) but they gave up that as they struggled to pay the salaries of players. Lets not go the Barcelona way. Upto their eyeballs in debt. Barcelona has a history of not having any commercial sponsorships.Debt is not due to shirt sponsorship,Its just a fraction.Bcci can afford to have only india Logo .
Jersey #10 Posted November 1, 2013 Author Posted November 1, 2013 Barcelona has a history of not having any commercial sponsorships.Debt is not due to shirt sponsorship' date='Its just a fraction.Bcci can afford to have only india Logo .[/quote'] What are the chances of BCCI not milking every penny possible? It's headed by a crude businessman to add.:cantstop:
Soorma_Bhopali Posted November 1, 2013 Posted November 1, 2013 Airtel India or Tata India would be fabulous.
diga Posted December 9, 2013 Posted December 9, 2013 Is it not Star Sports? The word on the street is that SA tour is curtailed as the new sponsor starts from Jan 1 & Ten sports owns the rights of SA tour Star Group on Monday bagged the sponsorship rights for the Indian cricket team for all BCCI, ACC and ICC events for Rs 1.92 crore per match. The sponsorship is for more than three years with the deal commencing from January 1st 2014 till March 31st 2017.
StriKe Posted December 9, 2013 Posted December 9, 2013 Star wins Indian team's title-sponsor rights Star India, the television network, has won the title-sponsor rights of the Indian team, having submitted the winning bid to the BCCI on Monday. So Star now holds all own the three important rights in Indian cricket: broadcasting, series title and team sponsorship. Star bid Rs 1.92 crore per match for bilateral series, and Rs 61 lack per match for ICC-sponsored tournaments. It holds the rights for the period running January 1, 2014, to March 31, 2017. It is understood that Sahara India Pariwar, the current rights holder, who had bought the bid document, was found technically ineligible by the BCCI marketing committee, as it is involved in legal wrangles with the Indian board. The rights include the right to be called the official team sponsor, and to display a commercial logo on the men's, women's, Under-19 and A teams' kits. More to follow
Sidhoni Posted December 9, 2013 Posted December 9, 2013 Star everywhere. Why would they even sponsor the series title is something I don't get. Wouldn't they get a share of the money if someone else like Micromax etc sponsors series title?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now