Jump to content

Is this really a "settled" side, or should changes be made before the World Cup?


Is this really a "settled" side, or should changes be made before the World Cup?  

  1. 1.

    • Yes. They deserve more time to prove themselves.
      1
    • No. It's far from a settled side.
      10


Recommended Posts

Posted

Just before the New Zealand tour began, Dhoni expressed satisfaction in his team saying that both ODI and Test squads look settled. That despite the fact that India lost got whitewashed in the ODI series against South Africa, lost the Test series without winning a match and are now on the verge of getting handed another whitewash in New Zealand. The giants in our backyard, the likes of Shikhar Dhawan and Rohit Sharma have been lambs overseas, the middle order barring Kohli has been a complete failure and too much has been left to Dhoni to do the near impossible. The bowling has never been strong but in the last two series it has been nothing short of appalling. Barring Mohammed Shami, no one has shown the capability of taking wickets. Bhuvneshwar Kumar has a strike rate of over 70, and our spinners have a strike rate of over 100, with Ashwin touching an embarrassing 200. Is this really a "settled" side? Or do you think the performances in the last two series has unsettled them?

Posted

World cup is far. We should worry about the next tournament first then worry about who's going to play, since we don't exactly know who is a settled player right now in our team. We are just team of 5 confirmed players right now. I can bet you that. No more than 5 plyaers or probably 4 look sure start for the world cup. These guys need to first confirm their place for few series than to be considered as world cup prospects.

Posted
Is this even a question? Obviously its not a settled side.
The question was though that do you think that changes need to be made now or do you think these players (Rohit, Shikhar, Bhuvneshwar etc.) still deserve more chances?
Posted
The question was though that do you think that changes need to be made now or do you think these players (Rohit' date=' Shikhar, Bhuvneshwar etc.) still deserve more chances?[/quote'] Bhuvi does. Not the openers, IMHO.
Posted
Pujara is a must' date=' and I'd also take Gambhir for one of Dhawan/Rohit.[/quote'] Don't think Gambhir would be back until Dhawan fails in an other series. Pujara could replace Rohit. If things go as it has been, the opening would probably be led by Gambhir & Pujara.
Posted

Lol at World Cup. We have no chance of doing well in World Cup. I can think of at least 7 teams which will do better in these conditions and 1 year is too small a time to make major changes and improve batting and bowling in a big way. Good thing is we can stop worrying about India's chances in World Cup and get on with our work and stop wasting time.

Posted
Lol at World Cup. We have no chance of doing well in World Cup. I can think of at least 7 teams which will do better in these conditions and 1 year is too small a time to make major changes and improve batting and bowling in a big way. Good thing is we can stop worrying about India's chances in World Cup and get on with our work and stop wasting time.
Is it really that improbable though? We've always sucked in South Africa too yet that's also where we reached the World Cup final once and won the T20 World Cup.
Posted
Is it really that improbable though? We've always sucked in South Africa too yet that's also where we reached the World Cup final once and won the T20 World Cup.
You're comparing a side with Sachin, Dravid, Sehwag, Ganguly, Yuvraj, Zaheer Khan, Srinath, Kumble, Harbhajan Singh at their prime with this side ? :hysterical: Even Agarkar was a very good ODI bowler and Nehra used to bowl quick, swung it a mile and bowled some great spells back then.
Posted
You're comparing a side with Sachin' date=' Dravid, Sehwag, Ganguly, Yuvraj, Zaheer Khan, Srinath, Kumble, Harbhajan Singh at their prime with this side ? :hysterical: Even Agarkar was a very good ODI bowler and Nehra used to bowl quick, swung it a mile and bowled some great spells back then.[/quote'] Again, even with Sachin, Dravid, Sehwag, Ganguly, Yuvraj, Zaheer Khan, Srinath, Kumble, Harbhajan Singh in their prime, we have always sucked in South Africa yet played well in those two World Cups. And the current side is more or less the same one that won the Champions Trophy in England.
Posted
Again' date=' even with Sachin, Dravid, Sehwag, Ganguly, Yuvraj, Zaheer Khan, Srinath, Kumble, Harbhajan Singh in their prime, we have always sucked in South Africa yet played well in those two World Cups. And the current side is more or less the same one that won the Champions Trophy in England.[/quote'] The conditions in Champions Trophy are quite different from Aus/NZ. Also, South Africa used to be an excellent ODI side, especially at home back then. So they had the edge over us. That Indian side had the potential to defeat most teams on any day other than the mighty Aussie side whom we ran into in the final or perhaps South Africans at home. Its not a surprise we reached the final.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...