Jump to content

Speeds and Performances of Pacers and Spinners


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, express bowling said:

 

 

Siraj has hit 147 k / 148 k in tests and ODIs too. In the Asia Cup he was regularly hitting mid to high 140s.  And has a good bouncer. I don't know how he is becoming a medium pacer suddenly. 

must be going by cricinfo classification? I remember they have a revolting classification. at some point, likes of peak umesh, varun aaron, srinath, etc were classified as medium-fast. people can debate whether they should be called "express", people can debate their effectiveness, etc... but in no way were these people medium-fast or even fast-medium

Posted
11 minutes ago, express bowling said:

In the end we have drawn an away test series in SA, and two of the main architects have been 2 Indian Fast bowlers. One was the MoS and the other the MoM in the won test. 

 

Friends, lots to cheer about and enjoy !!

 

 

Still the TM and Selectors are not making good and longterm plan to get the Pace combination right.

 

Bad timing for Rana to get injured, he can easily be tried in place of Thakur. If Thakur does not get 1/2 top batters from the opstn side he will always look bad with his inability to bowl tight lines build pressure.

 

Mayank Yadav is injured too, they are picking Saini for A team which does not make much sense rt. now. SA, Aus are places where u need to send your fastest in A tours check if they are good, what improvements are required.

 

 

   

Posted (edited)
44 minutes ago, express bowling said:

In the end we have drawn an away test series in SA, and two of the main architects have been 2 Indian Fast bowlers. One was the MoS and the other the MoM in the won test. 

 

Friends, lots to cheer about and enjoy !!

 

 

siraj was unexpectedly good . boomer was good as one would expect. thakur was disappointing as expected. mukesh did well, credit to him. prasidh was unexpectedly crap.

 

my 1 line summaries for all pacers.

Edited by Vijy
Posted
2 minutes ago, tapandrun said:

Still the TM and Selectors are not making good and longterm plan to get the Pace combination right.

 

Bad timing for Rana to get injured, he can easily be tried in place of Thakur. If Thakur does not get 1/2 top batters from the opstn side he will always look bad with his inability to bowl tight lines build pressure.

 

Mayank Yadav is injured too, they are picking Saini for A team which does not make much sense rt. now. SA, Aus are places where u need to send your fastest in A tours check if they are good, what improvements are required.

 

 

 

 

 

Agree.  

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, tapandrun said:

Still the TM and Selectors are not making good and longterm plan to get the Pace combination right.

 

Bad timing for Rana to get injured, he can easily be tried in place of Thakur. If Thakur does not get 1/2 top batters from the opstn side he will always look bad with his inability to bowl tight lines build pressure.

 

Mayank Yadav is injured too, they are picking Saini for A team which does not make much sense rt. now. SA, Aus are places where u need to send your fastest in A tours check if they are good, what improvements are required.

 

 

   

I still think they should look at one out-and-out swing bowler, irrespective of pace (as long as it's over 133-135). they will be useful in NZ, SA, even Eng if they resort to green tracks.

 

of course, both express pacers and hit the deck pacers should be looked at as well

Edited by Vijy
Posted
1 minute ago, Vijy said:

siraj was unexpectedly good . boomer was good as one would expect. thakur was disappointed as expected. mukesh did well, credit to him. prasidh was unexpectedly crap.

 

my 1 line summaries for all pacers.

 

For me, the biggest plus was Bumrah pounding the pitch hard again after 2021, for bounce and seam movement. 

 

And this helped us pick wickets in the 2nd innings even when the ball wasn't moving that much. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Vijy said:

I still think they should look at one out-and-out swing bowler, irrespective of pace (as long as it's over 133-135). they will be useful in NZ, SA, even Eng if they resort to green tracks.

 

of course, both express pacers and hit the deck pacers should be looked at as well

Mukesha is one,he's looks best among swingers

Posted
3 minutes ago, Vijy said:

I still think they should look at one out-and-out swing bowler, irrespective of pace (as long as it's over 133-135). they will be useful in NZ, SA, even Eng if they resort to green tracks.

 

of course, both express pacers and hit the deck pacers should be looked at as well

 

Bumrah has become a top swing bowler with the new ball after his comeback in late 2023.  

Posted
Just now, express bowling said:

 

Bumrah has become a top swing bowler with the new ball after his comeback in late 2023.  

yes, but we should look for an younger pacer too. boom is 30, not exactly old, but we cannot rule out injuries. should have a proper conveyer belt of all types of pacers

Posted
3 hours ago, Vijy said:

siraj was unexpectedly good . boomer was good as one would expect. thakur was disappointing as expected. mukesh did well, credit to him. prasidh was unexpectedly crap.

 

my 1 line summaries for all pacers.

Bumrah was brutal. Had my doubts cause he chokes sometimes in second innings but he stepped up big time. Clearly he was injured in wtc final 2021 and should gave never played. He also shouldn't have played in nz series when he had just returned back them. 

 

Bumrah average 12.91 in this series. Incredible

Posted
9 minutes ago, Number said:

@express bowling Mark Waugh and Akram talking about extra pace of Amer Jamal being the reason he is successful in Australia. The best bowler in Pakistani camp. Even on a flatter Sydney track he is doing so well.

How fast was he, I only saw Highlights of first test and he wS bowling 128-134.

Posted
11 hours ago, Suhaan said:

Mukesha is one,he's looks best among swingers

Mukesh is a gamble. He will be ineffective in subcontinent. And despite his lack of pace, he has a tendency to bowl no balls. England is his best bet. But there are plenty pacers way better than him waiting in the queue.

Posted
14 minutes ago, Rightarmfast said:

Mukesh is a gamble. He will be ineffective in subcontinent. And despite his lack of pace, he has a tendency to bowl no balls. England is his best bet. But there are plenty pacers way better than him waiting in the queue.

I was saying among who are 130-135

Posted
8 hours ago, harpicP said:

I felt Mukesh is more of a seam bowler ala slower shami. Mukesh is surprisingly not a short guy. I thought he was. He looked as tall or taller than bumrah who is close to 6 foot. 

 

Yes, Mukesh is basically an open chested seam bowler who can sometimes swing the new Dukes or SG ball in helpful conditions. Saw this swing in the WI tests and Irani Cup for a few overs. Haven't seen him swing the Kookabura yet. 

 

Till now my impression is that he bowls well when help is on offer ( sometimes better than the aggressive pacers ) and looks innocuous when movement is not available. Saw this yesterday first session and in the ODI series. 

 

He has the ability to rear up a few balls from back of a length from time to time, and just when you are appreciating this delivery in your mind, he bowls a few gentle balls. 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...