Jump to content

Indian squad for England ODIs declared


Recommended Posts

Posted
Batsmen -- selection is more or less on expected lines. Would have preferred Jadhav in place of Rayudu. Spinners -- why Karn Sharma ? Any quality that separates him from the rest ? Pacers ---Why Umesh for ODI ? He is s test bowler. Why no Aaron ? BK and Shami not rested ! There is no " bounce pacer " in the lineup. That may cause some problems.All pacers, apart from Kulkarni, are on the shorter side. Not ideal for outside sub- continent tournaments. The pace lineup is strange.
I guess they wanted a leggie without compromising on fielding/batting. To his credit,hes done well in IPL and okay in Aus A tour.
Posted
Should have been there in place of Kulkarni.
Really? Kulkarini bowled in for Ind A, Do you not think Kumar and/or Shami should be rested?
Posted
Should have rested Bhuvan and Dhoni. Raina should have led the side.
I agree this was the squad I posted in another thread
Dhawan has been struggling, give the pacemen, Jadeja and MSD a break Givve Samson one more season I think, also Uthappa might have blown his chances with a below par A team tour How about: Naman Ojha Rahane Kohli Puara Rohit Raina Aksar Ashwin Dhawal Varun Aaron Mohit Sharma Rishi Dhawan, Ishwar P, Manoj T, Gautam G
In hindsight maybe Kedhar for Mano. I dont think Rayudu is a bad pick though. I dont agree with the notion that Pujara is a test bat only, his List A record is great he will adapt. We need reliable run scorers in the middle order in ODIs
Posted
Should have been there in place of Kulkarni.
Kulkarni did very well in the recently quadrangular A series. Umesh did nothing there as far as I know.
Posted
Kulkarni did very well in the recently quadrangular A series. Umesh did nothing there as far as I know.
Umesh only played tests and picked 5 wicket haul on patta and it's not his fault that selectors have no consistency In a tour level he is test specialist and at international level he is now limited over player ? That's bs
Posted

First XI:-Dhawan,Rahane,Kohli,Rohit,Raina,Dhoni,Jadeja,Ashwin,Kulkarni,Aaron,Mohit. Reserves:-Samson,Kedar,Rishi,Karn,Kulkarni,Umesh,Bumrah. This should've been the squad.I'd like to rest BK & Shami.

Posted
. Samson is the right selection ahead of kedar. Kedar is 30 while Samson is 19. Samson is more explosive and more effective in limited overs cricket.
Actually, no. Kedar Jadhav is without question "more explosive and more effective" in limited overs cricket. One only needs to look at their strike rates in first-class, List-A and T20 cricket to find out. Samson vs Jadhav First-class 55.65 vs 66.45 List A 78.47 vs 106.33 T20 121.24 vs 140.70
Posted
Really? Kulkarini bowled in for Ind A, Do you not think Kumar and/or Shami should be rested?
But there was no need to replace Aaron in ODIs. He has barely played 4 matches since his come back. They need to stick to a core group of bowlers for next 1 years and let them play and improve. Also, Aaron will be better suited to Aus pitches.
Posted
Umesh only played tests and picked 5 wicket haul on patta and it's not his fault that selectors have no consistency In a tour level he is test specialist and at international level he is now limited over player ? That's bs
Selectors are lacking brains. Kulkarni played both test and ODs on A tour. Why was Umesh omitted from ODs. They really have some messed up logic. Now Aaron dropped after only playing 4 ODIs since come back like Umesh was dropped after not getting a single game in SA and NZ.
Posted
Selectors are lacking brains. Kulkarni played both test and ODIs on A tour. Why was Umesh omitted from ODIs. They really have some messed up logic. Now Aaron dropped after only playing 4 ODIs since come back like Umesh was dropped after not getting a single game in SA and NZ.
like i said there is no planning or consistency .. now look at this.. there is back up being send for injury of back up wicket keeper but n back up is being send for injury of 2 main front line seamers ... to me these current selectors are mixing formats and forgetting what they selected few weeks ago and its resulting in players being wasted i have n idea why bumrah and umesh did not bowl in odis at a tour level when umesh is in odi side and bumrah is in contention for all formats
Posted
like i said there is no planning or consistency .. now look at this.. there is back up being send for injury of back up wicket keeper but n back up is being send for injury of 2 main front line seamers ... to me these current selectors are mixing formats and forgetting what they selected few weeks ago and its resulting in players being wasted i have n idea why bumrah and umesh did not bowl in odis at a tour level when umesh is in odi side and bumrah is in contention for all formats
They lack common sense these jokers.Well if they can select binny anyway i had given up on them.
Posted
like i said there is no planning or consistency .. now look at this.. there is back up being send for injury of back up wicket keeper but n back up is being send for injury of 2 main front line seamers ... to me these current selectors are mixing formats and forgetting what they selected few weeks ago and its resulting in players being wasted i have n idea why bumrah and umesh did not bowl in odis at a tour level when umesh is in odi side and bumrah is in contention for all formats
Yes, Bumrah and Umesh both should have played one days too.
Posted
But there was no need to replace Aaron in ODIs. He has barely played 4 matches since his come back. They need to stick to a core group of bowlers for next 1 years and let them play and improve. Also' date=' Aaron will be better suited to Aus pitches.[/quote'] Yeah I totally agree that Varun should be there, in the first XI for ODIs in fact instead of Bhuvi Kumar. Because BK has bowled so much of late, and Kulkarni seems to be bowling well and deserves a chance to play for India.
Posted
Actually, no. Kedar Jadhav is without question "more explosive and more effective" in limited overs cricket. One only needs to look at their strike rates in first-class, List-A and T20 cricket to find out. Samson vs Jadhav First-class 55.65 vs 66.45 List A 78.47 vs 106.33 T20 121.24 vs 140.70
Don't give too much importance to stats in FC. Just saying. Its always important to see the player's technique and temperament and skill rather than just go by numbers. Jadeja has 3 triple centuries and average of 50+ in FC and so does Rohit Sharma and Manish Pandey and a bunch of others who are not that good to be honest. Scoring runs in FC in India is damn easy. You can't take them too seriously.
Posted
Don't give too much importance to stats in FC. Just saying. Its always important to see the player's technique and temperament and skill rather than just go by numbers. Jadeja has 3 triple centuries and average of 50+ in FC and so does Rohit Sharma and Manish Pandey and a bunch of others who are not that good to be honest. Scoring runs in FC in India is damn easy. You can't take them too seriously.
Thats why we have A tours also,where he did well/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...