Jump to content

Indian Team for 5th test-The Oval


vijay50

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 bolwers proven to be madness. Batting just to weak Cant win without 20 wickets but also cant win without runs Must play 6 bats with ashwin 7 and keeper at 8
Probability of winning is more with 5 bowlers than with 6 batsmen. With 6 batsmen with this line up it is going to be playing for a draw from the outset. If one bowler is off color or breaks down then it will be virtually impossible to rotate bowlers without leaking runs through part timers. 6th batsman is total useless. We don't have no.6 batsman who can score 200 runs to make up the deficit. IN all fairness thank god they didn't pick Rohit sharma. 8 for 4 would have become 8 for 5 in no time. We could have been bowled out for the lowest total in history.
Posted
5 bolwers proven to be madness. Batting just to weak Cant win without 20 wickets but also cant win without runs Must play 6 bats with ashwin 7 and keeper at 8
Yea Nohit will score a triple century na? We are hopeless.EVeryone on ICF wanted this line up for 4th test.What did we do? ANDA!!!!Big ANDA egg.jpg
Posted
Gavaskar Sehwag Dravid Tendulkar Amarnath Laxman Dhoni(c and wk) Kapil Dev Srinath Kumble Aaron We may draw the test with this team.But with Dhoni captain,it may be tough.
I love your team. The strongest possible in the modern era. Nice and logical touch of adding an extra hostile fast bowler in Aaron.
Posted

ashwin to open jadeja out rohit in gambhir out or may bat at 4 instead of kohli shami in pankaj out ishwar pandey in vijay ashwin pujara kohli/gambhir rahane rohit dhoni bhuvi shami aaron ishwar

Posted
That is not strategy. That is total bakwas. If only we had used 5 genuine bowlers from the first test with better rotation there would have never been weariness, breakdowns they would have been far more penetrative throughout the day. For peanut 50 extra runs (at most scored by no.6) you give away 200 extra runs with a tired bowling unit which will affect the rest of the series as well. This was repeatedly said by everyone in the very very first test 1000 times. But he acted as if he wanted to prove a point he doesn't need more than 4 he underused 5th bowler. In the third test he made the dumbest team selection. India is not used to playing 5 test series. especially this line up. Gap between first and second test was mere three days. IN addition to that they had to bat as well thanks to our top order. So if anyone needed ultimate comfort cushion that were bowlers not the batsmen considering you have handy lower order batsmen. No.6 batsman brings NOTHING to the table in winning a test. But No.5 specialst bowler enables the captain to rotate the bowlers better and he can have someone like Aaron go for 4 over fast spells .Unless your idea is to draw the test how would you justify a 4 bowler theory . This is all the more ridiculous considering our batsmen can't bowl to save their life.
You are 100% right. Some just won't realize the need for 5th bowler. They would talk about runs/wickets by 6th batsman/5th bowler with virtually no perception skills to look at the larger impact the 5th bowler brings in. Also another thing is if 1 bowler is a total goner in a Test, all is not lost if we have a 5th bowler,
Posted

1. Dexter Morgan 2. MTC 3. FischerTal 4. Sachin=God 5. Lord 6. Slickr392 7. Yoda-esque (captain and wicket-keeper) 8. G92 9. KT 10. KT 11. KT 3 KTs to fulfill his fast bowling fantasy :giggle:

Posted

Really disappointed by Kohli. Remember Sachin making his mark at OT (IIRC) during his first tour. I expected Kohli to play at least one scintillating knock and hopefully he will show his talent at Oval.

Posted
Really disappointed by Kohli. Remember Sachin making his mark at OT (IIRC) during his first tour. I expected Kohli to play at least one scintillating knock and hopefully he will show his talent at Oval.
Sachin had great technique,perhaps the best ever player in the 'V' region..Kohli is not that good.
Posted
That is not strategy. That is total bakwas. If only we had used 5 genuine bowlers from the first test with better rotation there would have never been weariness, breakdowns they would have been far more penetrative throughout the day. For peanut 50 extra runs (at most scored by no.6) you give away 200 extra runs with a tired bowling unit which will affect the rest of the series as well. This was repeatedly said by everyone in the very very first test 1000 times. But he acted as if he wanted to prove a point he doesn't need more than 4 he underused 5th bowler. In the third test he made the dumbest team selection. India is not used to playing 5 test series. especially this line up. Gap between first and second test was mere three days. IN addition to that they had to bat as well thanks to our top order. So if anyone needed ultimate comfort cushion that were bowlers not the batsmen considering you have handy lower order batsmen. No.6 batsman brings NOTHING to the table in winning a test. But No.5 specialst bowler enables the captain to rotate the bowlers better and he can have someone like Aaron go for 4 over fast spells .Unless your idea is to draw the test how would you justify a 4 bowler theory . This is all the more ridiculous considering our batsmen can't bowl to save their life.
That's some stupid thinking. Firstly, we don't even have 5 genuine bowlers, it's not like our 5th bowler is some bradman of bowling. And even, the overs given to the 5th bowler, it is very few, so it's much better to play a pure and genuine batsman. We won the Lord's test match on the base of solid batting, and imo, you check our recent history, it's batting which has let us down more. The gabbage batting has only made our bowling even worse.
Posted
You are 100% right. Some just won't realize the need for 5th bowler. They would talk about runs/wickets by 6th batsman/5th bowler with virtually no perception skills to look at the larger impact the 5th bowler brings in. Also another thing is if 1 bowler is a total goner in a Test, all is not lost if we have a 5th bowler,
Part time bowler and 5th bowler are the same thing, since we lack quality there.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...