Number Posted August 16, 2014 Posted August 16, 2014 AAP is also a polarizing topic. Earlier their supporters used to defend their acts and there used to be some heated debates in that thread but now they have given up. Too much of stupidity.
zakk Posted August 16, 2014 Posted August 16, 2014 Who is the closest brother of Shradda velu it is and dont ask again :hitler:
Texan Posted August 16, 2014 Posted August 16, 2014 Sachin fanboys will never accept that he only played for embellishing his own personal records.Team cause was always secondary.
Sachinism Posted August 16, 2014 Posted August 16, 2014 Theres the old Bradman chestnut. God almighty how that raged Like Federer fans won't accept a well known fact that Federer wouldn't have reached in 2 digits of grand slams if field wasn't so depleted. And the bait is set, well trolled sir... Oh those wasted hours :((
CSK Fan Posted August 16, 2014 Posted August 16, 2014 Sachin fanboys will never accept that he only played for embellishing his own personal records.Team cause was always secondary. :fishing:
CSK Fan Posted August 16, 2014 Posted August 16, 2014 Dhoni discussions are so one sided that it is not even fun anymore. At least with Sachin, his fans numbered more and detractors were less. With Dhoni it is opposite just a handful of people who support him, out of which half seem to be just trolling. There is no defending at all. Even his supporters are not doing a good job, Sidhoni doesn't even come and Yodasque just behaves like a jilted lover and martyr.
velu Posted August 16, 2014 Posted August 16, 2014 Dhoni discussions are so one sided that it is not even fun anymore. At least with Sachin' date=' his fans numbered more and detractors were less. With Dhoni it is opposite just a handful of people who support him, out of which half seem to be just trolling. There is no defending at all. Even his supporters are not doing a good job, Sidhoni doesn't even come and Yodasque just behaves like a jilted lover and martyr.[/quote'] i am expecting you to start supporting the minority if you know what i mean :--D
velu Posted August 16, 2014 Posted August 16, 2014 discussion going on cricket section will never be a serious thing .. after all its just a sport.. but peeps in political section seems to be really serious .. probably outy need a Z level security
Raghav_12 Posted August 16, 2014 Author Posted August 16, 2014 discussion going on cricket section will never be a serious thing .. after all its just a sport.. but peeps in political section seems to be really serious .. probably outy need a Z level security you really didn't follow sachin and bradman debates in cricket section only. that would have resulted in maximum casualties ever on a single topic on ICF. More posters were banned than were left behind to post on the topic.
Khalpat Posted August 17, 2014 Posted August 17, 2014 Most polarizing has been: Sachin is greatest Vs Sachin is great (Bhakts) Vs (Non Bhakts) and AAP, Congress, SP, BSP, JDU, DMK, BJD, RJD , BJP veteran supporters Vs Modi supporters (Non Jaahil, Secular, educated, High Class, Sonia's Dog, Inclusive Vs Jaahil, Right wing Chaadi)
Khalpat Posted August 17, 2014 Posted August 17, 2014 Any discussion in which people turn judgemental and do a gross generalization will become polarized. While discussing Sachin if we only concentrate on his footwork, stamina, eye hand coordination beleive me it will be not more than 3 page of discussion, the problem arises when someone takes a jibe and start using words like Bhakts, Fanatics etc. Similarly Sachin fans sometime take criticism of Sachin as a sin and something eqivalent to anti national activities which adds spice into the discussion and hence every one either for or against makes the discussion as his personal ego issue and hence polarization. Similar things happen with other polarizing figures like Modi, Kejriwal, Dhoni etc. The only public figures who are non polarizing have their name starting with Rahul. One of the Rahul(cricketer) is loved by everyone and the other one(politician) is laughed over by everyone. In our society, differences of opinion or disaggrement on any subject have turned into hatred.
Texan Posted August 17, 2014 Posted August 17, 2014 The only public figures who are non polarizing have their name starting with Rahul. One of the Rahul(cricketer) is loved by everyone and the other one(politician) is laughed over by everyone. :cantstop: Good one!
beetle Posted August 17, 2014 Posted August 17, 2014 The only public figures who are non polarizing have their name starting with Rahul. One of the Rahul(cricketer) is loved by everyone and the other one(politician) is laughed over by everyone. Top post.:hatsoff:
Recommended Posts