Lord Posted September 30, 2014 Posted September 30, 2014 exceptions ? you still have not named 1 chucker who did well outside of subcontinent comparable to herath,swann or even lyon! both Ajmal and Narine did well in LOIs overseas I think :hmmm:
Old guy Posted September 30, 2014 Posted September 30, 2014 both Ajmal and Narine did well in LOIs overseas I think :hmmm: do not think narina even played many and guys like jadeja did just as well and what happened in tests ? ajmal flopped for most part and narina could not buy wicket against england!
Lord Posted September 30, 2014 Posted September 30, 2014 do not think narina even played many and guys like jadeja did just as well and what happened in tests ? ajmal flopped for most part and narina could not buy wicket against england! Ajmal played only 1 Test in Aus,3 in England where he did well and 3 in SA where in one he did well IIRC.so hardly much:hmmm: Narine was ranked no. in ODIs too for a while,no?
Old guy Posted September 30, 2014 Posted September 30, 2014 Ajmal played only 1 Test in Aus,3 in England where he did well and 3 in SA where in one he did well IIRC.so hardly much:hmmm: Narine was ranked no. in ODIs too for a while,no? he only did well on type of track where even jaddu picked 6 and please remind me of one great performance by marine in international cricket that is not on track which spins ?
rkt.india Posted September 30, 2014 Posted September 30, 2014 Yeah exceptions are always there but obviously having one more variation will be even better theoretically. Its like batting.Guys like Sachin,Kohli did well in ODIs without needing switch hits,dilscoops etc.But those having those shots will always be more advantageous over those who don't on a normal basis. My point is either allow both or none. Thats a wrong analogy. All those shots are legal. Its not like batsmen have wider bats. Chucking is very similar to that.
rkt.india Posted September 30, 2014 Posted September 30, 2014 both Ajmal and Narine did well in LOIs overseas I think :hmmm: Narine was poor in England and NZ both.
Lord Posted September 30, 2014 Posted September 30, 2014 Thats a wrong analogy. All those shots are legal. Its not like batsmen have wider bats. Chucking is very similar to that. arrey I am questioning the laws itself.obviiously they are legal currently
SLICKR392 Posted September 30, 2014 Posted September 30, 2014 ^ Yep. Was gonna point that out. Narine was totally ineffective in that England ODI series.
rkt.india Posted September 30, 2014 Posted September 30, 2014 arrey I am questioning the laws itself.obviiously they are legal currently But why those should be illegal? Switch hit is a risky shot which also gives bowler a chance to pick a wicket.
Lord Posted September 30, 2014 Posted September 30, 2014 But why those should be illegal? Switch hit is a risky shot which also gives bowler a chance to pick a wicket. because it makes whole field setting irrelevant about risk,even trying to bowl doosra has risk of wrong line and length and getting smashed
Iconoclast Posted October 1, 2014 Posted October 1, 2014 He should have been the first one reported ... BCCI just trying to save face now.
Old guy Posted October 1, 2014 Posted October 1, 2014 He should have been the first one reported ... BCCI just trying to save face now. Let me break this news ..your opinion and opinion of fellow Internet trolls is insignificant Now that system worked and you all got proved wrong please have some shame and accept that system is fair because bcci and icc do not care ..
SLICKR392 Posted October 1, 2014 Posted October 1, 2014 Let me break this news ..your opinion and opinion of fellow Internet trolls is insignificant Now that system worked and you all got proved wrong please have some shame and accept that system is fair because bcci and icc do not care .. He never does that. Comes up with such ignorant posts e v e r y t i m e. :giggle: High time there is a comic based on this guy called- The Ignorant Man!
Iconoclast Posted October 1, 2014 Posted October 1, 2014 Let me break this news ..your opinion and opinion of fellow Internet trolls is insignificant Now that system worked and you all got proved wrong please have some shame and accept that system is fair because bcci and icc do not care .. Come on man ... you are one of the few decent posters here ... Narine is a bigger chucker than Hafeez or those other unknown bowlers ... he should have been reported first ... this is BCCI backtracking at its worst.
JaFanatic Posted October 1, 2014 Posted October 1, 2014 This guy's got a new reason to whine now :haha:
Old guy Posted October 1, 2014 Posted October 1, 2014 Come on man ... you are one of the few decent posters here ... Narine is a bigger chucker than Hafeez or those other unknown bowlers ... he should have been reported first ... this is BCCI backtracking at its worst. ok here is the thing this system does not works in this way..its not about reporting the biggest chucker first its about umpire finding action dodgy in match and other umpires agreeing and reporting it . what would umpire,bcci or icc gain by reporting him 1 match after ? trust me our opinion on these little forums do not counts and there is no pressure on them or no intention of saving ipl sides its simply umpires finding some bowlers dodgy in earlier matches and narine in this current match. here is my simple question to you please try to understand ...ajmal was only banned after banning of 6-7 different bowlers and ony one of them chucked more or as much and that is senanayake . why was ajmal not banned first ? was it pakistan board pressurizing and and they had to cope in after some cricketers whined on twitter ? is that the case ? sorry for being little rude in language before but i am tired of conspiracy theory the fact is every chucker is getting reported and its sequence does not matter the important part is people are getting reported regardless of team they play for and regardless of their name and reputation . i probably should not have used shame word but its annoying earlier it was bcci saving ipl sides and now bcci coping out ? just answer me was ajmal not bigger chucker than other guys who got banned like that bangladeshi bowler ?why was ajmal not first to get banned as he was bigger chucker and according to you that how this system works ..
Old guy Posted October 1, 2014 Posted October 1, 2014 let me put this simply this system does not weeds out biggest chuckers first but biggest chucker "in match" which caught attention of umpire .. bowlers will get away in one spell ,match or even series but in long run chuckers will get caught and that is how this system is set up. i even posted in other thread that its just matter of time he gets reported and after 3 hours he was ..i did not knew it will be so quick for me time frame was within this year.
FischerTal Posted October 1, 2014 Posted October 1, 2014 padosis won't stop whining until an indian spinner is called. thats why the frustration continues
Lord Posted October 1, 2014 Posted October 1, 2014 padosis won't stop whining until an indian spinner is called. thats why the frustration continues they won't stop even after that
FischerTal Posted October 1, 2014 Posted October 1, 2014 they won't stop even after that maybe frustrating that ajju miyan can't be javelin thrower anymore. also, that lbw to sachin in 2011 WC SF doesn't mean jack now :hehe:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now