adi B Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 well done vineet kulkarni,S ravi a.k.a tinu anand and tucker :clap:
Old guy Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 Well he could have opted to undergo testing after he reported the first time . in middle of tournament ?
Lord Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 agreed with sabby,technically hes been banned when he might be fine.hasnt even been tested
BeautifulGame Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 in middle of tournament ? Yeah. If not then face the consequences. Middle of the tournament is not an excuse .
Malcolm Merlyn Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 Even in ICC matches no bowler is banned just after reporting.They are banned only if testing report is againist them.Srini ofcourse has different rules.Its a coincidence that he was reported in last 2 matches so that he can be banned just before the finals and with no chance of getting a test done.If he was reported after the first match there was enough time for a test.Its obvious that CSK cant play him so they want him out. Mother ****er Srini and his chamcha Dhoni will not wield power forever and we will see what happens when the SC comes down on them.These guys have made a mockery of the game.
Malcolm Merlyn Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 Yeah. If not then face the consequences. Middle of the tournament is not an excuse . So BCCI can enforce rules in direct contradiction of ICC rules. LoL.
zubinpepsi Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 Even in ICC matches no bowler is banned just after reporting.They are banned only if testing report is againist them.Srini ofcourse has different rules.Its a coincidence that he was reported in last 2 matches so that he can be banned just before the finals and with no chance of getting a test done.If he was reported after the first match there was enough time for a test.Its obvious that CSK cant play him so they want him out. Mother ****er Srini and his chamcha Dhoni will not wield power forever and we will see what happens when the SC comes down on them.These guys have made a mockery of the game. :--D:--D:--D cry cry cry... more cry... its ironcial that you are dead against a cheat like Srini mama but never fail to support another cheat narine.. love the hypocrisy.. :asleep::asleep::asleep::asleep:
Old guy Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 Yeah. If not then face the consequences. Middle of the tournament is not an excuse . but he is not proved chucker yet! don't you get it this action(banning) is in consequence of opinion of umpire which is nothing more than ..yes, opinion! ...there is reason icc bans people only after testing and second report only count as second report after test has been done and then bowler is banned for year. i think icc gives 15-20 days and tests bowler if bcci want to be so strict get narine checked on day he is reported rather than counting second report as ban as first one is not even proved . he might get cleared and miss final of big tournament because ? remember its innocent until proven guilty and that applies here as well .
Old guy Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 :--D:--D:--D cry cry cry... more cry... its ironcial that you are dead against a cheat like Srini mama but never fail to support another cheat narine.. love the hypocrisy.. :asleep::asleep::asleep::asleep: make solid argument or post valid reason instead of trolling ..please respond to what he posted and not the poster ..
rkt.india Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 Will make sense if you have been tested banned and came back but he has not even been tested yet! This is BCCI norm. Once umpires report you twice, you are guilty until proven otherwise. Happens in domestic cricket too. Now, they are implementing it here too. Kamran Khan was banned without testing too.
Malcolm Merlyn Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 This is BCCI norm. Once umpires report you twice' date=' you are guilty until proven otherwise. Happens in domestic cricket too. Now, they are implementing it here too. Kamran Khan was banned without testing too.[/quote']
Malcolm Merlyn Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 :--D:--D:--D cry cry cry... more cry... its ironcial that you are dead against a cheat like Srini mama but never fail to support another cheat narine.. love the hypocrisy.. :asleep::asleep::asleep::asleep: Has Narine been tested?
Old guy Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 This is BCCI norm. Once umpires report you twice' date=' you are guilty until proven otherwise. Happens in domestic cricket too. Now, they are implementing it here too. Kamran Khan was banned without testing too.[/quote'] so that norm is wrong ..i can understand at club level when you do not have technology but this is international tournament if you want to get chuckers so badly send them to lab on day they are reported . i find icc approach much much better for this.
BeautifulGame Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 but he is not proved chucker yet! don't you get it this action(banning) is in consequence of opinion of umpire which is nothing more than ..yes, opinion! ...there is reason icc bans people only after testing and second report only count as second report after test has been done and then bowler is banned for year. i think icc gives 15-20 days and tests bowler if bcci want to be so strict get narine checked on day he is reported rather than counting second report as ban as first one is not even proved . he might get cleared and miss final of big tournament because ? remember its innocent until proven guilty and that applies here as well . He is suspected of chucking . When there is suspicion why should he be allowed to bowl. What about the affects to the batsmen who get dismissed and lose careers becoz of his chucking (if he is proved latter to be chucking)? When u are suspected of doing something illegal by authorities then u are suspended of the doing it until proven otherwise. It is the same as in any other workspace. Why should anyone bend the rules to accommodate cheats to let affect the innocent ones get affected. And its just pathetic touse the Srini angle to moan about it. Why aren't asking the same Hafeez was reported then? If u think Narine isn't a chucker its pointless arguing about. They always got away with it becoz ICC was spinless.Now ICC is acting the excuses that he should be banned mid tournament despite the standard law being for ages.
BeautifulGame Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 There is a difference between Kamran and Narine. Narine has been bowling at international level for 4 years now with no issues.This is the first time he has been reported at any level.So banning him without testing is pathetic excuse.Bcci rules contradict ICC rules.Srini and his ways. :lmao:
rkt.india Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 There is a difference between Kamran and Narine. Narine has been bowling at international level for 4 years now with no issues.This is the first time he has been reported at any level.So banning him without testing is pathetic excuse.Bcci rules contradict ICC rules.Srini and his ways. You are wrong. Narine was first called for chucking in WI domestics a few years back and then changed his action. So, his history is not pure. and then it does not matter whether someone is Narine or Kamran or Monish Parmar. It has been BCCI norm in domestic cricket that umpire will report the bowlers and if they are reported twice, they will be banned. This rules are there even before Srini and were implemented in domestics. Now ICC being harsh on chuckers, BCCO also doing same thing here, not surprised at all. Anyone familiar with domestic cricket will tell you that. Last year, Maharasthra's fast bowler, Sachin Chaudhari, who had helped them win matches was banned for chucking after reported by umpires and he could not play in important matches for them.
rkt.india Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 so that norm is wrong ..i can understand at club level when you do not have technology but this is international tournament if you want to get chuckers so badly send them to lab on day they are reported . i find icc approach much much better for this. He could also go to the lab and challenge the umpire's report after he was reported once, which he did not do.
Old guy Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 He could also go to the lab and challenge the umpire's report after he was reported once' date=' which he did not do.[/quote'] there is time given for a reason within that time frame you cannot punish him for something which is not guilty off! if you do not want him to bowl give him just 2 days to go check in lab but nope..they did give him standard 15-20 days i think..
Lord Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 It doesnt even make sense to report a bowler 2nd time when hes not been tested
rkt.india Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 It doesnt even make sense to report a bowler 2nd time when hes not been tested Ist report works as a warning for the bowler. This is how it works in domestic cricket. BCCI is more strict than ICC at that level. Umpire's report is enough for bowlers to get banned. A lot of bowlers in domestic cricket are banned this way.
Recommended Posts