Old guy Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 Ist report works as a warning for the bowler. This is how it works in domestic cricket. BCCI is more strict than ICC at that level. Umpire's report is enough for bowlers to get banned. A lot of bowlers in domestic cricket are banned this way. like i said if you have them time to tested then you cannot ban them within that time you should shorten it and ask bowler to get tested on that day only as strict measure but ban without proof is BS. at domestic level specially below ranji this is ok and coaches and umpires should have more power to correct bowlers but at international level icc does not do it for good reason . and if bcci is enforcing it why not test him in india ? they can test him in national academy ..
Lord Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 Is he banned from all levels? no only matches in India including IPL and internationals
Guest PrancingHorse Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 no only matches in India including IPL and internationals So he can bowl outside India?
Lord Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 So he can bowl outside India? yes technically hes been banned from BCCI organised events.So that normally includes matches only in India.
velu Posted October 3, 2014 Author Posted October 3, 2014 If the rule is same for all, then i have no issues.
Lord Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 One question : Only Narine's quicker ball was reported,shouldn't the ban only be regarding that?:hmmm:
velu Posted October 3, 2014 Author Posted October 3, 2014 One question : Only Narine's quicker ball was reported' date='shouldn't the ban only be regarding that?:hmmm:[/quote'] it will add lots of confusion ..
Lord Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 it will add lots of confusion .. why?umpire can just no ball him when he bowls a quicker one.maybe even a free hit
velu Posted October 3, 2014 Author Posted October 3, 2014 why?umpire can just no ball him when he bowls a quicker one.maybe even a free hit his normal delivery can be mistaken for quicker delivery and the opposite can also happen ..
Lord Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 his normal delivery can be mistaken for quicker delivery and the opposite can also happen .. thats what the umpires are there for.
velu Posted October 3, 2014 Author Posted October 3, 2014 thats what the umpires are there for. then why peeps are crying for DRS an UDRS :finger: anyway use your criminal investigation skills to uncover the plot :winky:
Lord Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 then why peeps are crying for DRS an UDRS :finger: anyway use your criminal investigation skills to uncover the plot :winky: back to trolling when you don't have answer
rkt.india Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 like i said if you have them time to tested then you cannot ban them within that time you should shorten it and ask bowler to get tested on that day only as strict measure but ban without proof is BS. at domestic level specially below ranji this is ok and coaches and umpires should have more power to correct bowlers but at international level icc does not do it for good reason . and if bcci is enforcing it why not test him in india ? they can test him in national academy .. Umpires are the first proof. They are not ban permanently. If they prove it in labs or improve their actions, they will be back. For me, naked eye is enough to see if someone is chucking or not. Naked eyes cannot differentiate till 15 degrees. If they find kink, it means it is over 15 degrees.
velu Posted October 3, 2014 Author Posted October 3, 2014 back to trolling when you don't have answer :finger: if umpires are so good then why he was allowed to bowl for the last 3 or 4 years ? :hmmm:
Lord Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 :finger: if umpires are so good then why he was allowed to bowl for the last 3 or 4 years ? :hmmm: So he should not be allowed to even his clean deliveries coz umpires are blind . Sounds fair
Lord Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 Even Bhajji and Botha were banned from only bowling doosra , not totally
velu Posted October 3, 2014 Author Posted October 3, 2014 So he should not be allowed to even his clean deliveries coz umpires are blind . Sounds fair so who will compensate the batsmen who were the victims of naraines illegal delivaries ?? :giggle: Lordie .. caught u with ur pants down :hehe:
Lord Posted October 3, 2014 Posted October 3, 2014 so who will compensate the batsmen who were the victims of naraines illegal delivaries ?? :giggle: Lordie .. caught u with ur pants down :hehe: No ball will prevent it. You are assuming umpires are blind which is a poor excuse . Why deny him wickets on deliveries which are not even reported
Recommended Posts