Jump to content

Srinivasan,Raj Kundra named in IPL scandal report


Recommended Posts

What is new and important in this report that we didn't already know? That some guy violated code of conduct and Srini and co. didn't take action. Seriously that is all they came up with after wasting tax payer money and SC's valuable resources for 1 year?

Link to comment
What is new and important in this report that we didn't already know? That some guy violated code of conduct and Srini and co. didn't take action. Seriously that is all they came up with after wasting tax payer money and SC's valuable resources for 1 year?
SC knowing can punish culprits. So would you let a criminal go away saying it is waste of tax payers money ?
Link to comment
SC knowing can punish culprits. So would you let a criminal go away saying it is waste of tax payers money ?
Will let police gather evidence like they already did in case of Kundra and Meyyappan and follow a criminal case against them. There was no need for SC involvement in this prematurely. They went on a fishing expedition and came up with an empty net.
Link to comment
Will let police gather evidence like they already did in case of Kundra and Meyyappan and follow a criminal case against them. There was no need for SC involvement in this prematurely. They went on a fishing expedition and came up with an empty net.
SC has to reply to Bihar cricket board member who filed this complaint in the court. I thought that's what they did. Also considering how these igh profile cases get swept under the carpet this is a good decision.
Link to comment
Will let police gather evidence like they already did in case of Kundra and Meyyappan and follow a criminal case against them. There was no need for SC involvement in this prematurely. They went on a fishing expedition and came up with an empty net.
Do you understand this was a PIL to the SC right?
Link to comment

We acted on player's code violation - BCCI

The BCCI has filed an affidavit with India's Supreme Court to contest the Mudgal panel's finding that its sidelined president N Srinivasan and four other board officials were aware of a player's code of conduct violation but did not act on it. The BCCI said the IPL player, known as Individual 3 in the Mudgal report, had been "orally reprimanded" and the then board president Shashank Manohar was satisfied with the player's explanation. The cricketer is named in the Mudgal committee report on the role of players in the IPL 2013 corruption scandal, but his name was omitted in the report on the officials. In his affidavit, BCCI secretary Sanjay Patel said: "On 18th (November), BCCI discussed Justice Mudgal Panel report and Ranjib Biswal, representing Orissa Cricket Association, who was the manager at the time of incident, mentioned that the incident referred to by the panel took place when he was the manager of the Indian cricket team. The incident was a minor one and player was orally reprimanded and Shashank Manohar, President of BCCI at that time was satisfied with the explanation given by the player." The Mudgal report, which was submitted to the Supreme Court on November 3, had referred to Srinivasan as Individual No. 13 and stated: "the individual along with four other BCCI officials was aware of the violation of the Players Code of Conduct by Individual 3, but no action was taken against Individual 3 by any of the aforesaid officials who were aware of this infraction". The report also found Srinivasan not guilty of either betting or fixing, or of having tried to prevent the investigation into the IPL 2013 corruption scandal. Srinivasan, however, is one of four individuals - along with IPL chief operating officer Sundar Raman, Chennai Super Kings team official Gurunath Meiyappan and Rajasthan Royals co-owner Raj Kundra - to have received a court notice for alleged "misdemeanours". The next hearing of the case is on November 24.
http://www.espncricinfo.com/india/content/current/story/801963.html
Link to comment

Nikhil Naz @NikhilNaz · 31m 31 minutes ago N Srinivasan to SC: Since investigation by the panel is over & nothing incriminating against me, I must be allowed to take over as BCCI Prez CSK owners to SC: No ground exists for cancellation of CSK in IPL. Meiyappan is neither share holder, director or employee of India cements. CSK owners to SC: Cancellation of franchise will result in serious consequences as CSK most popular team in IPL & its players very popular. CSK to SC: Show us the records on the basis of which Mudgal panel came to the conclusion that Meiyappan was s team official of CSK. CSK to SC: As per IPL norms disenfranchising can be done only if owner of the franchise violates relevant clauses & Meiyappan wasn't owner.

Link to comment
Nikhil Naz @NikhilNaz · 31m 31 minutes ago N Srinivasan to SC: Since investigation by the panel is over & nothing incriminating against me, I must be allowed to take over as BCCI Prez CSK owners to SC: No ground exists for cancellation of CSK in IPL. Meiyappan is neither share holder, director or employee of India cements. CSK owners to SC: Cancellation of franchise will result in serious consequences as CSK most popular team in IPL & its players very popular. CSK to SC: Show us the records on the basis of which Mudgal panel came to the conclusion that Meiyappan was s team official of CSK. CSK to SC: As per IPL norms disenfranchising can be done only if owner of the franchise violates relevant clauses & Meiyappan wasn't owner.
even though i support CSK , bolded part izz taking it bit too far :hysterical:
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...