Glaring umpiring decisions- India in Australia 2014/15

[adi B]

Dhoni didn't go for a catch that any keeper would have taken all day long,this is becoming a habit!!. Also Pishant wasn't standing on the boundary, should have caught when Johnson top edged the ball,in all,70-80 would have been saved

[coffee_rules]

rahane and rohit were blatant noballs in other parts of the world...f u c king fatso gould is a blatant cheat...

[Cricket_Hacker]

ashwin

[rajmarie]

Have a feeling t ha t it's a being done purposely against India....specially when outside India. Like forcing bcci to accept drs to avoid all the bad calls. Actually the bad calls against us are going higher by the Series. Not far then we wilnol have 5 or.more bad calls per innings to increase pressure. All this while bcci waits for it to become 100% correct. Maybe they should 1st select 100% correct team

[Gollum]

Pathetic from umpires, pretty sure its all being done on purpose. **** you BCCI, **** you Sachin for destroying the future of Indian cricket.

[Cricket_Hacker]

rahane and rohit were blatant noballs in other parts of the world...f u c king fatso gould is a blatant cheat...

are you sure?i didn't see

[vijay50]

BCCI through ICC should suspend the umpires for poor performance like how they did for Bucknor.Then they will come in line.

[Insidious]

Pathetic from umpires' date=' pretty sure its all being done on purpose. **** you BCCI, **** you Sachin for destroying the future of Indian cricket.[/quote'] Sachin never against DRS. some posters here as delusional. This is what sachin said on drs back in 2011 I don't think any player or even Dhoni is against DRS. They are just following BCCI's ditkat. It is srinivasan, who is against DRS and he is powerful enough to enforce his opinions on poor players.

[Precambrian]

Pathetic from umpires' date=' pretty sure its all being done on purpose. **** you BCCI, **** you Sachin for destroying the future of Indian cricket.[/quote'] **** you idiot. Atleast do your research before mouthing off.

[Gollum]

**** you idiot. Atleast do your research before mouthing off.

Mind your language. And yeah Sachin and Kumble were the guys who opposed DRS initially in Sri Lanka series in 2008 when they didn't know how to use it. And Sachin's position is so powerful that BCCI were forced to accept his word as gospel truth. Ever since that BCCI is adamant reg this matter because they don't want to admit they were wrong.

[AmreekanDesi]

lol how the hell can the poster claim that rahane and sharma were out on no balls? the 3rd umpire spent enough time to check it. part of the boot should be behind the line when landed. doesnt matter if its grounded.

[AmreekanDesi]

but its true that india seems to get a bad deal and an umpire a cop out due to BCCIs stance on drs. our opposition to drs shouldnt mean that the umpires get a clean chit for howlers.

[Gollum]

What's the count? 10-3 or 11-3 in favour of Aussies?

[express bowling]

Dharmasena has fecked us again as an umpire. What has happened to the rule, " the benefit of doubt goes to the batsman ". Now it has become, " the benefit of doubt goes to the umpire ". :cantstop:

[Gollum]

Dharmasena has fecked us again as an umpire. What has happened to the rule, " the benefit of doubt goes to the batsman ". Now it has become, " the benefit of doubt goes to the umpire ". :cantstop:

Nah the benefit of doubt goes against india

[zep1706]

Include Rahane's dismissal. He did not look out to me although mysteriously Ch9 never showed the hawk-eye view. It was an important moment in the match too.

[Lord]

Dharmasena has fecked us again as an umpire. What has happened to the rule, " the benefit of doubt goes to the batsman ". Now it has become, " the benefit of doubt goes to the umpire ". :cantstop:

Match changing moment.We could well have taken the lead and even got 650 as Torres promised:((

[brendan07]

Include Rahane's dismissal. He did not look out to me although mysteriously Ch9 never showed the hawk-eye view. It was an important moment in the match too.

Showed it after play, was fractionally missing. Wasn't a complete howler as frankly a slog across the line and you deserve to be given, but it was just wrong.

[zep1706]

Showed it after play' date=' was fractionally missing. Wasn't a complete howler as frankly a slog across the line and you deserve to be given, but it was just wrong.[/quote'] Not a howler but still would have been overturned by DRS. We are keeping a count of all wrong dismissals to see how it always ends up hurting India more. I have seen this in all overseas tests. Umpires tend to give the 50-50 decisions against India.

[express bowling]

Showed it after play' date=' was fractionally missing. Wasn't a complete howler as frankly a slog across the line and you deserve to be given, but it was just wrong.[/quote'] The benefit of doubt should go in favour of the batsman.