Jump to content

Did India deserve to win Adeliade test today?


Did India deserve to win Adeliade test today?  

  1. 1.



Recommended Posts

Posted

We were outplayed for 4 days and only had a chance to win as they declared twice! Having said that we got ourselves into a position on day 5 where we should have won

Posted
There have only been 7 instances in test history when team batting last has chased more than 360 (that too its not in one day) and last time was in 2008. Where did you get this idea of "many matches drawn or won by batting team" on fifth day pitch ?
I am not talking about 360....just saying surviving last day is not a miracle now a days as it was few years back. This year only Pakistan chased 300 in 60 overs for loss of 5 wickets on last 2.5 sessions....
Posted
There have only been 7 instances in test history when team batting last has chased more than 360 (that too its not in one day) and last time was in 2008. Where did you get this idea of "many matches drawn or won by batting team" on fifth day pitch ?
I mentioned Draw & win..
Posted
I don't believe in deserving victories. If you win' date=' then you deserved as per laws of cricket. Moral victories, and this sibject are all bull.[/quote'] Agree...
Posted
We were outplayed for 4 days and only had a chance to win as they declared twice! Having said that we got ourselves into a position on day 5 where we should have won
How were we outplayed for 4 days? It was a batting track, they got the chance to bat first which is a big advantage on this track and made the most of it. India played equally well on third day. They set it up on the 4th day and India almost chased it down. Not sure how we were outplayed on all 4 days.
Posted

Honestly saying ,NO!! This chase being adventurous was due to a bold declaration by clarke and Lehman and off course the grit of two Indian batsmen. we didn't deserve to lose though after the fight back but see it this way,had we played full day on day 2 ,aus would have confortably won the match

Posted

India - Yes, Kohli - No. When you fill up the team with 4 bunnies who can neither bat, bowl or field and a sifarshi selection like Karn Sharma, you deserve to lose. period. I feel bad for Kohli who did all he could and probably would have gotten us home if even one other batsman had stayed with him. In the end he had to go for it himself seeing the implosion and paid the price.

Posted
India - Yes, Kohli - No. When you fill up the team with 4 bunnies who can neither bat, bowl or field and a sifarshi selection like Karn Sharma, you deserve to lose. period. I feel bad for Kohli who did all he could and probably would have gotten us home if even one other batsman had stayed with him. In the end he had to go for it himself seeing the implosion and paid the price.
Yeah, we have left Kapil Dev, Imran Khan, Shane Warne, Kumble left in India. Kohli in pc said that playing Karn was his personal decision as he was bowling beter than other two spinners in the nets.
Posted
How were we outplayed for 4 days? It was a batting track' date=' they got the chance to bat first which is a big advantage on this track and made the most of it. India played equally well on third day. They set it up on the 4th day and India almost chased it down. Not sure how we were outplayed on all 4 days.[/quote'] We never bowled out the Aussies in a single innings - 12 wickets is all we managed, roughly we bowled them once and we got bowled out twice. And we were not outplayed? We were lucky to be given a small chance to win, and we made a good attempt.
Posted
we only took 12 wickets while they took 20 and scored 48 more runs
Lyon was the difference between the two teams. No other bowler really made the difference.
Posted
Lyon was the difference between the two teams. No other bowler really made the difference.
Indian bowlers leaked runs like a sieve - Aaron at 6rpo and Shami at 5rpo in the first innings. This allowed the Aussies to force a game result inspite of losing a day to rain.
Posted
Yeah' date=' we have left Kapil Dev, Imran Khan, Shane Warne, Kumble left in India. Kohli in pc said that playing Karn was his personal decision as he was bowling beter than other two spinners in the nets.[/quote'] Yup, we have nobody better than Aarons and karn Sharmas. FC cricket and averages be damned and let's select bowlers on the basis of IPL and speed guns.
Posted
Yup' date=' we have nobody better than Aarons and karn Sharmas. FC cricket and averages be damned and let's select bowlers on the basis of IPL and speed guns.[/quote'] No, we dont thats the reality.
Posted
We do and the stats say so. We have pacers with a bowling average of 22 and 23 sitting at home whereas guys averaging 37 are selected for the Test.
You need to look at Aaron from last season because he played after 2 years. Exclude his injury riddeled years between 2008-2010. He never played consistently before that due to injuries and he averaged 20 last season. This was the first full season he played. So, they picked a bowler averaging 20 in FC. Talking about overall average is useless in case of him.
Posted
How were we outplayed for 4 days? It was a batting track' date=' they got the chance to bat first which is a big advantage on this track and made the most of it. India played equally well on third day. They set it up on the 4th day and India almost chased it down. Not sure how we were outplayed on all 4 days.[/quote'] Overall I think we were outplayed not by much but they bowled us out! We didn't come close and needed them to declare twice we batted better than we bowled but they still had a lead of 73 so I don't see how we were not outplayed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...