KFC_Zinger Posted December 15, 2014 Posted December 15, 2014 That reminds me, Where is Dinesh Karthik ??
fineleg Posted December 15, 2014 Posted December 15, 2014 That reminds me' date=' Where is Dinesh Karthik ??[/quote'] Tailunt wise, DK is a far more tailunted batsman than Saha or Dhoni in Tests. But DK is another brainfart guy and unreliable batsman, like Nohit Sharma, and hence rightly out of Indian team after numerous chances given to him.
Austin 3:!6 Posted December 15, 2014 Author Posted December 15, 2014 I would have Dhobi as a WK' date=' not as captain. He has grit and is definitely better than Saha and Ojha.[/quote'] Dont think Dhoni will play under any captain. Too much baggage to do so.
Austin 3:!6 Posted December 15, 2014 Author Posted December 15, 2014 Tailunt wise' date=' [b']DK is a far more tailunted batsman than Saha or Dhoni in Tests. But DK is another brainfart guy and unreliable batsman, like Nohit Sharma, and hence rightly out of Indian team after numerous chances given to him. Oh please. Far more talented batsman than Dhoni who has one the fastest test double? :cantstop: Boy, isn't Dhoni underrated in ICF or what.
bulbul Posted December 15, 2014 Posted December 15, 2014 Gavaskar exposed :hysterical: Same paper different dates?? :cantstop:
Austin 3:!6 Posted December 15, 2014 Author Posted December 15, 2014 Gavaskar exposed :hysterical: :cantstop:
Marut Posted December 15, 2014 Posted December 15, 2014 Gavaskar exposed :hysterical: Shows Gavaskar is a cricket fan, like the rest of us. Cricketers are themselves, fan too. Before the match it is obvious that India should have looked for a win. But at some point on the 5th day when victory appeared improbable (like after the fall of Rahane) they could have gone for a draw, if they wished. Batting out 25 overs isn't a tough thing, but chasing 120 in 25 overs with six wickets in hand was a tough and risky task.
Shivaji bhonsle Posted December 15, 2014 Posted December 15, 2014 Dhoni wouldn't have gone for a win in the first place.
Marut Posted December 15, 2014 Posted December 15, 2014 Tailunt wise' date=' DK is a far more tailunted batsman than Saha or Dhoni in Tests. But DK is another brainfart guy and unreliable batsman, like Nohit Sharma, and hence rightly out of Indian team after numerous chances given to him.[/quote'] DK was given a few chances, and after a moderate beginning, he grabbed his chances with a spectacular run in 2007, averaging 42+ for that year. In 2008, he was dropped following a poor run in Srilanka, but after that he never got a chance. So basically, he was eliminated after one poor showing in Srilanka. Any opportunities he had after that were sporadic and limited to one or two well spaced out matches an year, hardly enough for any batsman to settle in and prove his worth. After 2008, DK did not get two tests in a row any time, and it is not surprising that he faded away. The fact is DK was good in SA and England - He would have done better than Dhoni away from India if he had been given the opportunity. Dhoni, of course is a much better batsman at home - DK can never dream of the double ton that Dhoni conjured against Australia.
ThePhenomenal1 Posted December 15, 2014 Posted December 15, 2014 forget DK, doesnt have the grit. get rayudu in
zep1706 Posted December 15, 2014 Posted December 15, 2014 I actually think that if Saha can learn from this blunder he can be a good prospect for India. His wicket keeping looked good (one missed stumping but that can happen to anyone) and he looked assured in his batting, got a bad call in the first innings. IMO he actually deserves to get more chances.
Raghav_12 Posted December 15, 2014 Posted December 15, 2014 It is obvious Dhoni coming in at that stage instead of Saha would have helped. But than that stage itself wouldn't have come :-)
Sidhoni Posted December 16, 2014 Posted December 16, 2014 But than that stage itself wouldn't have come :-) We could only pick up 12 wickets. With that kind of bowling we didn't even deserve to win. It was Clarke who gave us a chance by his stupid/sporting declaration and Kohli fell for the trap. It was freshening to see the positive approach no doubt, but I think they should have rediscussed it after Rahane fell and our tail started.
bowl_out Posted December 16, 2014 Posted December 16, 2014 We could only pick up 12 wickets. With that kind of bowling we didn't even deserve to win. It was Clarke who gave us a chance by his stupid/sporting declaration and Kohli fell for the trap. It was freshening to see the positive approach no doubt' date=' but I think they should have rediscussed it after Rahane fell and our tail started.[/quote'] On hindsight, it was a clever declaration. Anything lesser (say 300 with 10 extra overs), India would have won... Anything more (say 420 with 10 fewer overs), India wouldn't have gone for a win.
Sidhoni Posted December 16, 2014 Posted December 16, 2014 On hindsight' date=' it was a clever declaration. Anything lesser (say 300 with 10 extra overs), India would have won... Anything more (say 420 with 10 fewer overs), India wouldn't have gone for a win.[/quote'] Kohli told the players the previous night that they would go for the win no matter what the score.
Texy Posted December 16, 2014 Posted December 16, 2014 Gavaskar is a pesky little man. Was always selfish in his playing days and now plays both sides as a pundit. Hope the loss of this test doesn't diminish Virat's drive to win. Unfortunately, the cancer is coming back and he'll gladly take draws for the rest of the series.
achilles Posted December 16, 2014 Posted December 16, 2014 Patronizing, Sunny Sir. Didn't expect you to stoop to this.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now