Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Why? Why do we have so much insecurity that anytime, anything is directed at Hindusim we get all whiny and point fingers at others? The western freedom of freedom and media was born the day when the majority religion, Christianity was mocked. No one pointed fingers at other religions then. Sadly, the very guys who live in the west with all freedom of expression, want India to be in the stone ages with regressive mentality. If Hinduism allows itself to be mocked, it is the greatness of our religion. Why do you want to compare with other, lesser religions who do not allow the same freedom? What is the need to be whiny and feel victimized There is a dangerous trend in India's youth today, a feeling of victimization for something which is not even there.
Did I mentioned anything against the movie or freedom of expression in India. Go read my post again. I am asking would he have the same review for the movie if it were against him ? Would he be impartial ? Advani comes as a hypocrite and am I mere asking the question. Babri masjid is one of worst things to happen to india which is time and again used by our neighbors to cause multiple problems which has caused an unbreakable circle of communal violence.speak what u read and don't pollute your thoughts on my post. May be that what happens when u stay on the padosi forums for long you don't read what is written but read what you want. Every post at least here is not a consipiracy theory or something against freedom of expression.
Posted
Why? Why do we have so much insecurity that anytime, anything is directed at Hindusim we get all whiny and point fingers at others? The western freedom of freedom and media was born the day when the majority religion, Christianity was mocked. No one pointed fingers at other religions then. Sadly, the very guys who live in the west with all freedom of expression, want India to be in the stone ages with regressive mentality. If Hinduism allows itself to be mocked, it is the greatness of our religion. Why do you want to compare with other, lesser religions who do not allow the same freedom? What is the need to be whiny and feel victimized There is a dangerous trend in India's youth today, a feeling of victimization for something which is not even there.
The world has very clear message if you want your religion not to be mocked then behave like muslims. When muslims were protesting over the film all over the world then Obama and other leaders of west were pleading to youtube to remove that film.Even in PK the director did not even show PK entering mosque with wine bottles .The message from PK is very clear I am afraid of muslims so I will treat them like kids gloves.What 's strange if Hindu's are now learning from muslims
Posted
Actually' date=' even in the stone ages most of our ancestors had more in the brain tank than the average rashtravadi has over the Internet. We had one of the most advanced universities where free education was given to not just people form the kingdom but also international students. We accepted and imbibed cultures - these are things that make me proud of being Indian. After the comments that I see on a regular basis in these times, I am sometimes more than just embarrassed to be born in modern day India. I wish I could experience the magnificent TRUE (not our kulcha defined) cauldron of culture amalgamation and knowledge.[/quote'] What I find to be extremely amusing is that these Hindutvavadis would accuse Muslims of being intolerant (which is true for a large number of them BTW) and then go on to behave the same way. On one hand they would be glorifying the tolerant nature of Hinduism and Hindus but at the same time they would behave exactly opposite of that. If you ask them a question their reply would be another question: where were you when Muslims did this? So if you know that what Muslims did was wrong why are you trying to emulate that morons. :hysterical: These Hindutva goons disgust me as much as the Islamist fundamentalists.
Posted
The world has very clear message if you want your religion not to be mocked then behave like muslims. When muslims were protesting over the film all over the world then Obama and other leaders of west were pleading to youtube to remove that film.Even in PK the director did not even show PK entering mosque with wine bottles .The message from PK is very clear I am afraid of muslims so I will treat them like kids gloves.What 's strange if Hindu's are now learning from muslims
Movie is made for earning a nice profit, why they will take unnecessary risk :cantstop:
Posted

"Jo Dar Gaya, woh Mandir gaya".... There's a dialog in the movie PK. Could anybody explain what was the context of this dialog? Was it necessary to drive home some logic? What would've happened if Aamir said, " Jo Dar gaya, woh Masjid/Church gaya"?

Posted
"Jo Dar Gaya, who Mandir gaya".... There's a dialog in the movie PK. Could anybody explain what was the context of this dialog? Was it necessary to drive home some logic? What would've happened if Aamir said, " Jo Dar gaya, who Masjid/Church gaya"?
That comment is unfortunate tbh
Posted
What I find to be extremely amusing is that these Hindutvavadis would accuse Muslims of being intolerant (which is true for a large number of them BTW) and then go on to behave the same way. On one hand they would be glorifying the tolerant nature of Hinduism and Hindus but at the same time they would behave exactly opposite of that. If you ask them a question their reply would be another question: where were you when Muslims did this? So if you know that what Muslims did was wrong why are you trying to emulate that morons. :hysterical: These Hindutva goons disgust me as much as the Islamist fundamentalists.
so now one cant voice opinion against a film? Who is the real intolerant one? VHP and Dal aside many Hindus did have their sentiments hurt. Any Hindu has a right to approach the courts. Let the judiciary decide if sentiments were hurt. and just for the record in the land of the free and the home of the brave there was a major jewish reaction to Passion of the christ. On one hand in our country we have people drawing implications for minorities when 25th was celebrated as good governance day and participation made optional. On the other hand Hindus should not protest against lines like "jo dar gaya woah mandir gaya" ?
Posted
so now one cant voice opinion against a film? Who is the real intolerant one? VHP and Dal aside many Hindus did have their sentiments hurt. Any Hindu has a right to approach the courts. Let the judiciary decide if sentiments were hurt. and just for the record in the land of the free and the home of the brave there was a major jewish reaction to Passion of the christ. On one hand in our country we have people drawing implications for minorities when 25th was celebrated as good governance day and participation made optional. On the other hand Hindus should not protest against lines like "jo dar gaya woah mandir gaya" ?
Forget U.S.A,how about issue with Da Vinci code in India when there wasn't anything even half offensive in that movie
Posted
What I find to be extremely amusing is that these Hindutvavadis would accuse Muslims of being intolerant (which is true for a large number of them BTW) and then go on to behave the same way. On one hand they would be glorifying the tolerant nature of Hinduism and Hindus but at the same time they would behave exactly opposite of that. If you ask them a question their reply would be another question: where were you when Muslims did this? So if you know that what Muslims did was wrong why are you trying to emulate that morons. :hysterical: These Hindutva goons disgust me as much as the Islamist fundamentalists.
So the word "Mandir" can be used,how about saying islamist militants did what they did after the bomb blast scene.....atleast a dialogue saying that "Quran dissaproves the acts of such militants" would have been good enough. but there are masked words like Khudah ki Raksha etc. Either there has to be full censorship or none at all,can't have different benchmarks fo r different things. As a Hindu I wasn't offended but if someone was full right to them.
Posted
Forget U.S.A' date='how about issue with Da Vinci code in India when there wasn't anything even half offensive in that movie[/quote'] exactly. The systematic response in this case of Hindus who are offended is to target the directors and producers via non violent means. The producers and directors for not exactly known for their integrity when it comes to taxes for example. Target them where is hits the most. Everybody in Bollywood has a lot to hide. Its a hive of illegal money financed from all over the place. A degree of forensic accounting is needed.
Posted
That comment is unfortunate tbh
I always thought Aamir to be a bold actor... Unfortunately he too chickened out when he had a great opportunity...it's so easy to make fun or take potshots at any aspect of Hinduism... My point is, why do the easy stuff? Why not do bold films focussing more on religions other than Hinduism? Kamal Haasan's Vishwarupam comes in mind... The movie faced lots of protest and even banned for merely depicting a bearded terrorist planting a bomb...
Posted
I always thought Aamir to be a bold actor... Unfortunately he too chickened out when he had a great opportunity...it's so easy to make fun or take potshots at any aspect of Hinduism... My point is, why do the easy stuff? Why not do bold films focussing more on religions other than Hinduism? Kamal Haasan's Vishwarupam comes in mind... The movie faced lots of protest and even banned for merely depicting a bearded terrorist planting a bomb...
That's exactly my point....Fine I am totally ok with P.K debating a conman passing off as a godman because yes in reality that exists.... How about the P.K character going into a madrasa and arguing with a mullah brainwashing young men? or is that something in reality that doesn't exist.
Posted
so now one cant voice opinion against a film? Who is the real intolerant one? VHP and Dal aside many Hindus did have their sentiments hurt. Any Hindu has a right to approach the courts. Let the judiciary decide if sentiments were hurt. and just for the record in the land of the free and the home of the brave there was a major jewish reaction to Passion of the christ. On one hand in our country we have people drawing implications for minorities when 25th was celebrated as good governance day and participation made optional. On the other hand Hindus should not protest against lines like "jo dar gaya woah mandir gaya" ?
unfortunately voicing opinion makes you a right winger... For those who are not aware, UAE banned the movie Oh-my-God
Posted
That's exactly my point....Fine I am totally ok with P.K debating a conman passing off as a godman because yes in reality that exists.... How about the P.K character going into a madrasa and arguing with a mullah brainwashing young men? or is that something in reality that doesn't exist.
Let's see if Hirani and Aamir are bold enough to do that in PK2... :giggle:
Posted
Let's see if Hirani and Aamir are bold enough to do that in PK2... :giggle:
There is P.K2 as well :banghead:.....on a lighter note...Anushka gave tribute to Virat's performance in England by getting Lipjob...now after his chest thumping performance in Aus will she get someother enhancement :woot:
Posted

Does anybody also feel that Aamir khan is a really *****y copy of Robin Williams in Mork and Mindy? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mork_%26_Mindy Its not just this film, other so called Aamir khan hits can be copies of Hollywood films. Like Gajani was basically a copy of Nolan film Memento. Why is nobody stating the obvious that this movie suffers from plagiarism?

Posted
so now one cant voice opinion against a film? Who is the real intolerant one? VHP and Dal aside many Hindus did have their sentiments hurt. Any Hindu has a right to approach the courts. Let the judiciary decide if sentiments were hurt.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with expressing your feelings peacefully. You can go out and protest peacefully too. You can go to the court and file a complaint against it if it hurt your feelings and let the court decide on it. I am completely fine with it and in fact I encourage it. But you have no right to vandalize public and private property over it and try to force your will on others and threaten people who don't share your views. This does not look too peaceful to me--- "PK controversy: Bajrang Dal and Vishwa Hindu Parishad members attack theatres screening 'PK' in Ahmedabad and Bhopal" http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/PK-controversy-Bajrang-Dal-and-Vishwa-Hindu-Parishad-members-attack-theatres-screening-PK-in-Ahmedabad-and-Bhopal/articleshow/45676657.cms
×
×
  • Create New...