Detonator Posted March 17, 2015 Posted March 17, 2015 :cantstop: generations of people are not getting any fairer in Cold uk or canada. Arab girls are fair despite living in desert :boffing:
randomGuy Posted March 17, 2015 Posted March 17, 2015 why? that's the stupidest thing ive ever read. If you insist on remaining an ignoramus, its your wish.:two_thumbs_up:
CSK Fan Posted March 17, 2015 Posted March 17, 2015 It's a good post till the second para. poor and dark people are weak? This is wrong in multilple meta levels. And making fun of gays is offence? lol dood. Poor people are definitely down trodden in Indian society. Same with dark skinned people. If any dark skinned person has grown in north, particularly a lady, they can tell you about this And you don't think that a section of society who are not accepted, who get death threats and then instead of trying to understand them, all media relentlessly make fun of them, it is really inhumane?? Yes, that is going to help them get acceptance in society This is the sign of a growing society, that you move away from stereotypes and start accepting the differences. Look at the way Peter Dinklage is treated and look at our dwarf actors
CSK Fan Posted March 17, 2015 Posted March 17, 2015 why? that's the stupidest thing ive ever read. You do need a lot of melanin in your skin to avoid skin cancer in places like Kerala. The sun is relentless, very different from the North where the heat is mainly because of warm air (Loo)
flamy Posted March 17, 2015 Posted March 17, 2015 Also add .. Butcher as Muslim with a cap on and chewing Bettle leaves (Pan).:giggle: Hey Mihir, good seeing you bud
flamy Posted March 17, 2015 Posted March 17, 2015 all conspiracies to defame India. We have no problem and these statements are on tv because videshi takats are trying to destroy our super awesome image. :protest:
flamy Posted March 17, 2015 Posted March 17, 2015 Bipasha's pic won this thread Look at the way Peter Dinklage is treated and look at our dwarf actors Peter Dinklage is classy.
Tiger80 Posted March 17, 2015 Posted March 17, 2015 Poor people are definitely down trodden in Indian society. Same with dark skinned people. If any dark skinned person has grown in north, particularly a lady, they can tell you about this And you don't think that a section of society who are not accepted, who get death threats and then instead of trying to understand them, all media relentlessly make fun of them, it is really inhumane?? Yes, that is going to help them get acceptance in society This is the sign of a growing society, that you move away from stereotypes and start accepting the differences. Look at the way Peter Dinklage is treated and look at our dwarf actors What about traditional people . Indian comedy serials severly mock people who wear traditional dresses or can't speak English.Today I was having my dinner and watching peterson hill , a comedy serial on Sab . It has shown Haryanavi tau arriving in that along with his buffalo. It is just an example just watch comedy serials and you will find fun of being made of all traditional people, villagers etc.
Shivaji bhonsle Posted March 17, 2015 Posted March 17, 2015 That's all bull ****. Facial features are more or less same too. But you are not at fault. Aryan-dravidian theory is fed into us (both in South and North) from the society. Aryan , Dravidian theory is nothing but truth. Facial features are completely different too. I have been to Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka. I know the difference between a Haryani and a Tamil. People get hurt easily when we discuss such subjects. Lets leave it there.
randomGuy Posted March 18, 2015 Posted March 18, 2015 Aryan ' date=' Dravidian theory is nothing but truth. [b']Facial features are completely different too. I have been to Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka. I know the difference between a Haryani and a Tamil. People get hurt easily when we discuss such subjects. Lets leave it there. I hope you don't mean the mustache by the bolded part.:cantstop: Btw Kejriwal is a Haryani compare him with Hindi speaking guy with southie parents like Murli Kartik or R. Madhvan. When I said 'northies living in south', I meant over a thousand years, without technology and not in today's pakka houses with ACs but in huts I too have lived in south india for 5 yrs and worked with southies from all states.
gattaca Posted March 18, 2015 Posted March 18, 2015 statement reminds me of this good old song. ILgrhR9rjyM
Book_Worm Posted March 18, 2015 Posted March 18, 2015 Aryan ' date=' Dravidian theory is nothing but truth. Facial features are completely different too. I have been to Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka. I know the difference between a Haryani and a Tamil. People get hurt easily when we discuss such subjects. Lets leave it there.[/quote'] what about maharashtra, orissa, bengal! why highlight only the southern states and even gujratis i have met tonnes of them who look like south indians. i don't get hurt easily my point is why only southern people are considered different when most of the indians look similar to south .What about bihar and MP? this is a video of american express shot in north tell me do they look like bollywood actors? 46G4Pnd0LUQ Features may be different but majority of the people are dark skinned and mixed.That is the point north indians even if lighter than rest are still not fair skinned like bollywood. Yes there is truth to aryan and dravidian theory i agree but what indians don't seem to get is race mixing. All over the world races have mixed and u people act as if indians have never mixed.
Shivaji bhonsle Posted March 18, 2015 Posted March 18, 2015 I hope you don't mean the mustache by the bolded part.:cantstop: Btw Kejriwal is a Haryani compare him with Hindi speaking guy with southie parents like Murli Kartik or R. Madhvan. When I said 'northies living in south', I meant over a thousand years, without technology and not in today's pakka houses with ACs but in huts I too have lived in south india for 5 yrs and worked with southies from all states. dude, I'm talking about a larger sample size. I have lived in a place called"Madurai" in Tamil Nadu for 4 months and I have seen the difference. Trust me. The two examples you took, Kartik and Madhavan, . Brahmins, aren't they? What's the % of Brahmins in Tamil Nadu? 3%? Not a bigger sample size. Kejriwal is a Agarwal. You know how Agarwals look like in general. Its like taking kamran akmal as an example and saying all the Pakistanis look like him. Lol. As I said people get hurt with such things. Lets leave it there, mate.
randomGuy Posted March 18, 2015 Posted March 18, 2015 dude' date=' I'm talking about a larger sample size. I have lived in a place called[b']"Madurai" in Tamil Nadu for 4 months and I have seen the difference. Trust me. Due to climatic conditions. You lived 4 months but I lived 5 years. Consider India (India+Pak+BD), Iran, Afghanistan which constitute a continuous land. Irani, Afghans are fairer due to climate. Then come Indians, Pakis and Bdeshis. And among them, Bengalis and South Indians are slightly darker, again due to climate. And that's that. The two examples you took, Kartik and Madhavan, . Brahmins, aren't they? What's the % of Brahmins in Tamil Nadu? 3%? Not a bigger sample size. So you are suggesting what Jeetanram Manjhi did? That Dalits are the original inhabitants of India.:haha: Kejriwal is a Agarwal. You know how Agarwals look like in general. Its like taking kamran akmal as an example and saying all the Pakistanis look like him. Lol. Whats the point? So they are Aryans or Dravidians? As I said people get hurt with such things. Lets leave it there, mate. Dont worry. There is nothing to get hurt abt.
Detonator Posted March 18, 2015 Posted March 18, 2015 randomdood lived in Madurai :woot: I would easily gain 10kgs considering the local food there :pepsi:
randomGuy Posted March 18, 2015 Posted March 18, 2015 randomdood lived in Madurai :woot: I would easily gain 10kgs considering the local food there :pepsi: No yar. In Hyd. , n visited Kerala and Bangalore.
Shivaji bhonsle Posted March 18, 2015 Posted March 18, 2015 Due to climatic conditions. You lived 4 months but I lived 5 years. Consider India (India+Pak+BD), Iran, Afghanistan which constitute a continuous land. Irani, Afghans are fairer due to climate. Then come Indians, Pakis and Bdeshis. And among them, Bengalis and South Indians are slightly darker, again due to climate. And that's that. So you are suggesting what Jeetanram Manjhi did? That Dalits are the original inhabitants of India.:haha: Whats the point? So they are Aryans or Dravidians? Dont worry. There is nothing to get hurt abt. You have never been to Madurai, isn't? Its not due to weather conditions. That's for sure. Afghanistan is the most hottest place in all the places you have mentioned, so, weather plays no or very less role. Meanwhile, people living in Rajasthan live in very hot conditions. Why is it Rajputs, Meenas, gujjars look different than bhills? Because bhills have aborgine(Dravidian) genes. I don't know what manjhi said. I can't comment about it. Even if he had said dalits are real inhabitants, does he mean all the south Indians are dalits? What sort of ridiculous comment is that? If you want to examples from Haryana, Google Haryanis and see for yourself if they look anything like Dravidians? The danger with such arguments is that people would term me as a racist and lot of people get hurt when you call them Dravidians or aborigines because some of them think its insulting. This is my last post in this thread. I don't want to continue with this argument anymore. Adios.
AmreekanDesi Posted March 18, 2015 Posted March 18, 2015 If you insist on remaining an ignoramus' date=' its your wish.:two_thumbs_up:[/quote'] might sound dumb but serious query here: you say if north Indians lived in South for an extended period they would be as dark as south Indians. what is the reasoning behind this statement. is there some logic? youre saying white ppl living for several generations in south india would become darker by same logic? also this is totally ignores the fact that weather (by and large) is pretty similar in south and north india
AmreekanDesi Posted March 18, 2015 Posted March 18, 2015 Aryan ' date=' Dravidian theory is nothing but truth. Facial features are completely different too. I have been to Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka. I know the difference between a Haryani and a Tamil. People get hurt easily when we discuss such subjects. Lets leave it there.[/quote'] exactly. its not even up for debate you need to be blind to not be able to tell difference if you have any exposure
Muloghonto Posted March 18, 2015 Posted March 18, 2015 The reason they are called is because of that. But what this guy said was not a fact. There are fair complexioned south Indians and there are dark skinned Northies as well. When you call entire south Indians as blacks based on skin tone and refer it as some kind of handicap (in a patronizing way) is racism. Obviously not a handicap or any such thing, but there is a chromatic variance between human beings and it does have a latitudinal (and regional weather) variance. Refer to this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Luschan%27s_chromatic_scale Obviously it is not encapsulating of everyone, all this chart means, is that the predominant population native to these regions can be classified in this melanin gradient (color). There will be massive individual variance that is outside the main portion of the distribution chart. To deny this, is to also deny science. It is easy to see why the chart breaks down as the 'celtic type' to be the whitest of white (and it is true in terms of skin color) because the English/Irish ecosystem is a double whammy of one of the lowest levels of sunshine hours (its cloudy as hell in the British Isles) to a correlative latitudinal decrease in melanin formation as one goes north or south of the equator. PS: Indians today are extremely racist against black skin color. No point denying it, it is as evident as it can be after spending no more than 3 months in India. It is also no point denigrating our heritage over it, because we were once the most culturally and historically tolerant society on the bloody planet. Even our Gods were dark and fair skinned- Krishna, Shiva, Kali- all portrayed or implied to've been a dark person. But those two facts do not nullify or justify one another.
Recommended Posts