imran666 Posted March 29, 2015 Posted March 29, 2015 Wahab's one spell does nothing to change the opinion that Pakistani team as a whole is a crap - pathetic batting' date=' pathetic fielding and mediocre bowling. Wahab did not even win that match for Pakistan. mind you. It was just a two over dream spell in the middle of a thrashing, he finished with 2/56.[/quote'] he created 2 catch chances and were dropped ..cant blame him ...and and trust me figures dont usually show the real story ..if watson and maxwells catches were taken pakistan would have won .wahab would have been more confidence and there were not that good batsmen after those too ..
HippoSucks Posted March 29, 2015 Posted March 29, 2015 he created 2 catch chances and were dropped ..cant blame him ...and and trust me figures dont usually show the real story ..if watson and maxwells catches were taken pakistan would have won .wahab would have been more confidence and there were not that good batsmen after those too .. Australia bats down to #11... Those catches and one more wicket would still not let Pakistan win.
imran666 Posted March 29, 2015 Posted March 29, 2015 Australia bats down to #11... Those catches and one more wicket would still not let Pakistan win. if those catches were taken aussies would have been 6 down under 100 and i dont think pak would have let them win ...same happend with game vs south africa ..when sa were down for 77 for 5 i turned off the tv and knew pak will win ...in aussie game after maxwall there was only 1 proper batsmen haddin and others were just sloggers ..we would have easly taken care of them ..cricket is a funny game ...as u said they might have made it because they bat deep but iff u ask majority of ppl they would say those 2 drop catches caused us the matches
sage Posted March 29, 2015 Posted March 29, 2015 the thread on that day praising him http://www.indiancricketfans.com/showthread.php?t=324017 i guess we need to open a thread everyday praising a pakistani its not like you guys won the WC atleast... Yes let's do this. I will start
Marut Posted March 29, 2015 Posted March 29, 2015 he created 2 catch chances and were dropped ..cant blame him ...and and trust me figures dont usually show the real story ..if watson and maxwells catches were taken pakistan would have won .wahab would have been more confidence and there were not that good batsmen after those too .. When did you have good catching ever? Bowling = Bowling + fielding. Those "ifs" and "buts" don't change the real story. Australia gave you a sound thrashing in that match.
imran666 Posted March 29, 2015 Posted March 29, 2015 Australia bats down to #11... Those catches and one more wicket would still not let Pakistan win. When did you have good catching ever? Bowling = Bowling + fielding. Those "ifs" and "buts" don't change the real story. Australia gave you a sound thrashing in that match. when did i prace our catching and fielding? ..i said if we had taken those catches we would have won ...like we did with south africa ..we took every catch on offer and we won ....and yes in the end aussies did win easly but u cant deny wahab did make them p1ss in there paints for a short wile then those catches were dropped
Texy Posted March 29, 2015 Posted March 29, 2015 Brilliant spell, only Wahab though, others bowled shyt. If not for poor catching and fielding, Pak would've given real scare to Aus.
express bowling Posted March 29, 2015 Posted March 29, 2015 Wahab bowled a brilliant spell. But that has been Pakistan's story really. Some short flashes of brilliance, lack of consistency, not playing as a team, unpredictability and lack of coordination.
thongale Posted March 29, 2015 Posted March 29, 2015 Hey Saliva' date=' you are sitting in Chennai and merrily bashing away India.You must a Lungan, Paki or Bangbro illegal immigrant. Get the feck out of Hindustan or I will have CBI come and bust a cap on your auss!! :giggle:[/quote']Whay the feck a Sri Lankan want to be an illegal immigrant to India? :hmmm:
Ultimate_Game Posted March 29, 2015 Posted March 29, 2015 Surprised nobody has mentioned Boult's spell against Aus in their group match. To me that was the spell of the tournament coming against the best middle order in world cricket.
ViruDilSeKhelo Posted March 29, 2015 Posted March 29, 2015 Wahab's one spell does nothing to change the opinion that Pakistani team as a whole is a crap - pathetic batting' date=' pathetic fielding and mediocre bowling. Wahab did not even win that match for Pakistan. mind you. It was just a two over dream spell in the middle of a thrashing, he finished with 2/56.[/quote'] This is exactly the reason I almost laugh at how people how been doing all mental over him. Typical success starved Pakistani fans. Any glimmer of hope. If Afridi had scored quickest 50 v Zimbabwe and done nothing himself or the team as a whole, that would also be equally celebrated. This is the very definition of hype. Why do they want recognition from Tendulkar? I thought Chuckmal ended Tendulkar's career? Didn't Akhtar have him quaking in his boots? :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
ViruDilSeKhelo Posted March 29, 2015 Posted March 29, 2015 I do not agree with him. IMO Southee against England and Starc on various occasions have been better. That's it for me. Boult at times as well. Morkel bowled quite a fiery spell to NZ in that loss as well.
HippoSucks Posted March 29, 2015 Posted March 29, 2015 if those catches were taken aussies would have been 6 down under 100 and i dont think pak would have let them win ...same happend with game vs south africa ..when sa were down for 77 for 5 i turned off the tv and knew pak will win ...in aussie game after maxwall there was only 1 proper batsmen haddin and others were just sloggers ..we would have easly taken care of them ..cricket is a funny game ...as u said they might have made it because they bat deep but iff u ask majority of ppl they would say those 2 drop catches caused us the matches South Africa has a very weak middle order. Australia has Haddin and Faulkner and even their tail is pretty strong (Johnson has a Test century and Starc has a 99). Chasing <250 would never be a problem for them if only one bowler bowled brilliantly. Although I agree that if the two dropped catches were taken properly, Australia would certainly have a tough chase. But if South Africa had gotten those run outs, they would have won the match as well so it is pointless speculating.
jonas10 Posted March 29, 2015 Posted March 29, 2015 see this betrays many things 1, you never substantiate with facts 2, that thread is about pak bowlers being called word class always.. and then not being that other than w's in reality. 3, them being arguably better than Indian bowlers does not mean they are always world class. 4, you are a closet paki. :haha: The only fact that needs to be substantiated is that Pakistan has fast bowlers that can put on spells like wahab. Show me mohit or shammi doing the same. With them it's all contain contain contain. They certainly don't have the ability to unleash hell like wahab does. Hence Pak fast bowlers have an x factor ability Indians lack. Yes I'm a closet paki cause I also say they got the worst batting fielding in the world no leadership or wicket keeper. Btw all those factors make India look even better than they are bowling. Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
South_Paw Posted March 29, 2015 Posted March 29, 2015 Hey Saliva' date=' you are sitting in Chennai and merrily bashing away India.You must a Lungan, Paki or Bangbro illegal immigrant. Get the feck out of Hindustan or I will have CBI come and bust a cap on your auss!! :giggle:[/quote'] For sure a Loin.
express bowling Posted March 29, 2015 Posted March 29, 2015 The only fact that needs to be substantiated is that Pakistan has fast bowlers that can put on spells like wahab. Show me mohit or shammi doing the same. With them it's all contain contain contain. They certainly don't have the ability to unleash hell like wahab does. Hence Pak fast bowlers have an x factor ability Indians lack. Yes I'm a closet paki cause I also say they got the worst batting fielding in the world no leadership or wicket keeper. Btw all those factors make India look even better than they are bowling. Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk Why is that the only factor that needs to be substantiated ? One big difference between a Wasim and a Wahab is that , even though Wahab is quicker and capable of a magic spell occasionally....he lacks consistency in performance whereas Wasim Akram could bowl well spell after spell and match after match. That is what makes a true champion. If you compare the ODI performances and wicket taking abilities of Shami and Wahab....Shami has 87 wickets from 47 matches @ 24.9 average whereas Wahab has 77 wickets from 54 matches @ 30.2 average. Who is the better ODI wicket taker ?
Autonomous Posted March 29, 2015 Posted March 29, 2015 Why is that the only factor that needs to be substantiated ? One big difference between a Wasim and a Wahab is that , even though Wahab is quicker and capable of a magic spell occasionally....he lacks consistency in performance whereas Wasim Akram could bowl well spell after spell and match after match. That is what makes a true champion. If you compare the ODI performances and wicket taking abilities of Shami and Wahab....Shami has 87 wickets from 47 matches @ 24.9 average whereas Wahab has 77 wickets from 54 matches @ 30.2 average. Who is the better ODI wicket taker ? It is because Shami is useful and better with new ball while Wahab lacks new ball skills. Generally he has been a top class bowler upfront with only 1 new ball. I think he was averaging pretty lower than this even after WI series of 2011
Vilander Posted March 30, 2015 Posted March 30, 2015 Whay the feck a Sri Lankan want to be an illegal immigrant to India? :hmmm: ass clown there are about 5 million of them there..cause you kill each other, often in a gruesome manner.
Vilander Posted March 30, 2015 Posted March 30, 2015 The only fact that needs to be substantiated is that Pakistan has fast bowlers that can put on spells like wahab. Show me mohit or shammi doing the same. With them it's all contain contain contain. They certainly don't have the ability to unleash hell like wahab does. Hence Pak fast bowlers have an x factor ability Indians lack. Yes I'm a closet paki cause I also say they got the worst batting fielding in the world no leadership or wicket keeper. Btw all those factors make India look even better than they are bowling. Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk nope you are wrong. 4 overs dont make a test match. sorry boss, your paki cricket team are loosers.:winky:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now