vayuu1 Posted August 21, 2015 Posted August 21, 2015 That team was full of legends and they surrendered against Mendis giving him 26 wickets. That wasn't their first tour to SL. This team has some novices who are playing their first test in SL. This team lacks the mental fortitude to create victories. They have lost from winning position. That was I'm 2008 not 2010
rkt.india Posted August 21, 2015 Posted August 21, 2015 That was I'm 2008 not 2010 yeah, forgot that but point still stands.
BeautifulGame Posted August 21, 2015 Posted August 21, 2015 yeah' date=' forgot that but point still stands.[/quote'] How ? How does drawing 1-1 against arguably the best Lankan team humiliation? Losing against the worst Lankan team after taking nearly 200 run lead is.
rkt.india Posted August 21, 2015 Posted August 21, 2015 How ? How does drawing 1-1 against arguably the best Lankan team humiliation? Losing against the worst Lankan team after taking nearly 200 run lead is. you forgot the loss in 2008 was also a loss and now you are comparing a noob India team to India's ATG team with Indian greats like SRT, VVS, Sehwag, RD, Bhajji, Zak. I will say This team is the weakest Indian team since I have started watching cricket, probably, 99 Aus tour team was as bad if not more. Neither I have great expectations from this team. I didn't even expect that they will be dominating them like they in first test other than the last day.
kosingh Posted August 21, 2015 Posted August 21, 2015 you forgot the loss in 2008 was also a loss and now you are comparing a noob India team to India's ATG team with Indian greats like SRT' date=' VVS, Sehwag, RD, Bhajji, Zak. I will say This team is the weakest Indian team since I have started watching cricket, probably, 99 Aus tour team was as bad if not more. Neither I have great expectations from this team. I didn't even expect that they will be dominating them like they in first test other than the last day.[/quote'] I don't think the 99 team was bad. Only the openers on that team were poor (S Ramesh and Devang Gandhi). Otherwise that team had Tendulkar, Dravid, Ganguly, Laxman (not established), Srinath, Kumble and Venkatesh Prasad).
Gollum Posted August 21, 2015 Author Posted August 21, 2015 I don't think the 99 team was bad. Only the openers on that team were poor (S Ramesh and Devang Gandhi). Otherwise that team had Tendulkar' date=' Dravid, Ganguly, Laxman (not established), Srinath, Kumble and Venkatesh Prasad).[/quote'] Even Ramesh was very good(remember his batting against Pak). That team had the manpower but were a phattu team.
BeautifulGame Posted August 21, 2015 Posted August 21, 2015 you forgot the loss in 2008 was also a loss and now you are comparing a noob India team to India's ATG team with Indian greats like SRT' date=' VVS, Sehwag, RD, Bhajji, Zak. I will say This team is the weakest Indian team since I have started watching cricket, probably, 99 Aus tour team was as bad if not more. Neither I have great expectations from this team. I didn't even expect that they will be dominating them like they in first test other than the last day.[/quote'] Dhoni wasn't even part of that 2008 team let alone captain.So how does that tour even matter? As I already asked if this is our worst team in recent memory how does our best player against Spin and one averaging 60+ in subcontinent not playing in the team ?
Vijy Posted August 21, 2015 Posted August 21, 2015 Dhoni wasn't even part of that 2008 team let alone captain.So how does that tour even matter? As I already asked if this is our worst team in recent memory how does our best player against Spin and one averaging 60+ in subcontinent not playing in the team ? It's because he lacks the "flair" that Binny, Bhajji, Nohit, Ishant, etc possess.
rkt.india Posted August 21, 2015 Posted August 21, 2015 Dhoni wasn't even part of that 2008 team let alone captain.So how does that tour even matter? Dhoni might not have played but it does not matter, we had lost that series badly. As I already asked if this is our worst team in recent memory how does our best player against Spin and one averaging 60+ in subcontinent not playing in the team ? Regarding this, I agree Pujara should have played.
BeautifulGame Posted August 21, 2015 Posted August 21, 2015 Dhoni might not have played but it does not matter' date=' we had lost that series badly.[/quote'] This was the quote i replied to. How does it matter when Dhoni didnt even play in that series? Maybe because of selections is why we have the worst team since 90s? Why shouldnt the team be excused for humiliating defeats as our worst team when they dont pick the best players deliberately?
Vijy Posted August 22, 2015 Posted August 22, 2015 Today, we saw tight bowling and safe batting... neither were flashy or had "flair". But, it is a calm and sustained approach like this that can help in winning matches.
Vijy Posted August 23, 2015 Posted August 23, 2015 Really Shastri... sending a clearly injured Saha to tuk-tuk for 5 overs is "aggressive"? I shudder to think of how you define "defensive" then - probably even worse than Trevor "Barnacle" Bailey.
Gollum Posted August 23, 2015 Author Posted August 23, 2015 Sending Saha back again when he was injured was stupidity. Also by that time Lungans were bowling shot pitch stuff to put a check on our scoring rate. To risk our bowlers there wasn't aggression, it was something else.
Vijy Posted August 23, 2015 Posted August 23, 2015 Sending Saha back again when he was injured was stupidity. Also by that time Lungans were bowling shot pitch stuff to put a check on our scoring rate. To risk our bowlers there wasn't aggression' date=' it was [b']something else. "Something else" = unadulterated stupidity/timidity?
sensible-indian Posted August 23, 2015 Posted August 23, 2015 Sending Saha back again when he was injured was stupidity. Also by that time Lungans were bowling shot pitch stuff to put a check on our scoring rate. To risk our bowlers there wasn't aggression' date=' it was something else.[/quote'] Yes that was a dumb move. Adding to that...that idiot Ashwin was playing Chameera's bouncers around the wicket without an arm guard. Whenever he hooks, he is mostly late onto the shot so higher odds of a mess up happening. Mishra was sensible enough to atleast wear an arm guard.
Gollum Posted August 23, 2015 Author Posted August 23, 2015 "Something else" = unadulterated stupidity/timidity? What is the word for highest level of stupidity? That one.
Gollum Posted August 23, 2015 Author Posted August 23, 2015 Yes that was a dumb move. Adding to that...that idiot Ashwin was playing Chameera's bouncers around the wicket without an arm guard. Whenever he hooks, he is mostly late onto the shot so higher odds of a mess up happening. Mishra was sensible enough to atleast wear that. Ashwin is an enigma. Sometimes he comes across as the most intelligent cricketer of our times and other times he comes across as an idiot.
Vijy Posted August 23, 2015 Posted August 23, 2015 Ashwin is an enigma. Sometimes he comes across as the most intelligent cricketer of our times and other times he comes across as an idiot. Let's hope he doesn't let his inner idiot out tomorrow
Marut Posted August 24, 2015 Posted August 24, 2015 LOL at the way people throw around the word idiot on top players.
Vijy Posted August 24, 2015 Posted August 24, 2015 LOL at the way people throw around the word idiot on top players. Gollum did say that he was a very intelligent cricketer as well, prone to only bursts of idiocy... which is true for pretty much any player. I had only stated that we will, hopefully, not see that side of him today and we didn't. I don't think either were taking potshots at him. Why take potshots at Ashwin anyway when we have the likes of Nohit and Bunny and Pisshant in the squad? :giggle:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now