Jump to content

KL Rahul can be our regular Keeper.......VOTE VOTE VOTE


gakgupta

Recommended Posts

Posted

Knock Knock.....This guy has talent with gloves Infact, i am pleasantly surprised with his glove work. He looked like a proper keeper and catch of Mathews inspires some confidence... With the absence of SAHA, he should keep wickets for india. Well, having seen Kohli who is a risk taker, it might happen as well Yeahhhh, it will be difficult for a keeper to open in a test match. Even more so, if we bowl first.....But it's just one more Test match to go and Rahul seems like a strong kid I am not quite sure, how to activate the voting functionality here. Mods can you pls help me here Guyz ....vote for below 1) Rahul should start keeping right away in test matches 2) Rahul is not ready yet and should be given time to develop keeping. 3) He is not good enough. Test matches should be played with proper keepers. This is not one day games 4) Keeping might affect his batting. We already seen this with Irfan when batting was enforced upon him.

Posted

If we want Rahul to keep then asking him open as well is very unfair . If he is keeping wkts then should be batting in at 5 or 6 to reduce and manage the burden . But with both Vijay and Dhawan ruled out shifting Rahul and opening with 2 non - Regular Opener (like Pujara and Nair) will be too risky. So for this test I would prefer Rahul opening and Ohja at 7. Maybe for the SA series when both Vijay and Dhawan are fit we might try Rahul as wk and bat him at 5

Posted

No..He has talent to become good opener for India, and we dont want him to be burdened with additional responsibilities..Wicket keeping in tests is a specialized position and it needs a proper WK..Its fine if he is used for ODI here and there!

Posted
Yet to prove his batting - let him concentrate on that before being dumped with additional responsibilities.
Would be better than saha anyways.... @OP Would solve all batting problems .rohit at 6,dhawan vijay rahul top 3..kholi at 4 and rahane at 5. Only thing missing is a proper allrounder. Pujara can replace any of these guys in case of injury.
Posted

First he has to be established as a regular batsman in the team. He is already looking very nervous so adding another burden like wicket keeping right now might be too early. Opening as a wicket keeper may be too difficult as he wouldn't get any rest in between the innings. I'm not sure how good of a wicket keeper he is either. Running a mediocre wicket keeper just to have an extra batsman may end up being costly.

Posted
First he has to be established as a regular batsman in the team. He is already looking very nervous so adding another burden like wicket keeping right now might be too early. Opening as a wicket keeper may be too difficult as he wouldn't get any rest in between the innings. I'm not sure how good of a wicket keeper he is either. Running a mediocre wicket keeper just to have an extra batsman may end up being costly.
Agree with that....but he showed signs of a decent wicket keeper
Posted

There can never be an opener keeping in tests can there? How is it possible to concentrate constantly then concentrate right away for batting? Is he a machine or a human? And no, he is not a No.6. /thread

Posted
There can never be an opener keeping in tests can there? How is it possible to concentrate constantly then concentrate right away for batting? Is he a machine or a human? And no, he is not a No.6. /thread
its been done before for india by engineer
Posted

Farokh, Kunderan, Mongia, Deepdas Gupta all have opened for India and kept wickets. Farokh was special, and easily leads the chart for keepers who also opened, having scored over 1500 runs @ 33 opening. But he too opened only in 26 test matches, out of his career total of 46 matches. We can look at breeding Rahul as an opener/wk but the expectations from him has to be kept low then as a batsman. Anything over an average of 35 considered as a bonus. Personally believe Rahul is capable of much more than that, and he should be hence allowed to prosper as a pure test bat.

Posted
Farokh, Kunderan, Mongia, Deepdas Gupta all have opened for India and kept wickets. Farokh was special, and easily leads the chart for keepers who also opened, having scored over 1500 runs @ 33 opening. But he too opened only in 26 test matches, out of his career total of 46 matches. We can look at breeding Rahul as an opener/wk but the expectations from him has to be kept low then as a batsman. Anything over an average of 35 considered as a bonus. Personally believe Rahul is capable of much more than that, and he should be hence allowed to prosper as a pure test bat.
Kunderan was our best keeper-batsman... dude averaged more than 40 and was a better batsman than Engineer at that position.
Posted
First he has to be established as a regular batsman in the team. He is already looking very nervous so adding another burden like wicket keeping right now might be too early. Opening as a wicket keeper may be too difficult as he wouldn't get any rest in between the innings. I'm not sure how good of a wicket keeper he is either. Running a mediocre wicket keeper just to have an extra batsman may end up being costly.
Sometimes, it works opposite......Since, he knows he is in the team as keeper, that takes of the pressure while batting
Posted
Sometimes' date=' it works opposite......Since, he knows he is in the team as keeper, that takes of the pressure while batting[/quote'] Like Dravid in ODIs? Would have been India's best keeper-batsman in ODIs if not for a man-machine named MSD.
Posted

I don't think he should be the regular keeper. 1-2 games in case of Injury is fine. Keeping is a very tough job, we will have to sacrifice his batting if he keeps. I don't think we should waste him at #6 or #7 as well. Let the specialists do their thing. Saha has done brilliantly well with the bat, may not be very convincing but at the end of the runs it's the runs you make is all that matters.

Posted
I don't think he should be the regular keeper. 1-2 games in case of Injury is fine. Keeping is a very tough job, we will have to sacrifice his batting if he keeps. I don't think we should waste him at #6 or #7 as well. Let the specialists do their thing. Saha has done brilliantly well with the bat, may not be very convincing but at the end of the runs it's the runs you make is all that matters.
Once Saha returns from injury, he should get back his place.
Posted

Like I said yesterday he certainly does not look like a part time keeper . He can't open if he keeps , even if he bats @6 it's a risk , but then in certain cases we have seen keeping improve a players batting as well . Tough one

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...