Can we take the centuries in Ranji's little serious now?

[gakgupta]

There was time where every single match was a lame draw and every batsmen used to get 100's. Some used to get double and even triple centuries.....but now...esp this season...there are lot of results in Ranji matches......this means batting is far more difficult as compared to 4 to 5 years back.....so batsmen making those 100's are much more capable? 

[Ankit_sharma03]

With being a lil aware of conditions , opp bowling attack 

IF u tell me Raina 100 against TN shud b considered as he is form n he shud b on the Flight to aus 

Well Think twice....n then again n then again 

[gakgupta]

With being a lil aware of conditions , opp bowling attack 

IF u tell me Raina 100 against TN shud b considered as he is form n he shud b on the Flight to aus 

Well Think twice....n then again n then again 

well....i m not talking about all centuries....if he scores consistently in all matches esp the one which has produced result..... then he should be taken seriously

[Anik Krishna]

Yeah. R8. But you must find the genuine talents though. Some are born to be domestic bully. Many score hundred. But all are not genuine talent neither ready for International stage. There are talented guys like Shreyas Iyer from Mumbai who can score hundreds and again some hack Sudip Chetterjee from Bengal can also score hundreds. But we know who is the right choice for next Indian National Team. 

You should choose the best ones. And for that the selectors regional and national should be very patient and caring. 

Edited November 21, 2015 by Anik Krishna

[gakgupta]

Yeah. R8. But you must find the genuine talents though. Some are born to be domestic bully. Many score hundred. But all are not genuine talent neither ready for International stage. There are talented guys like Shreyas Iyer from Mumbai who can score hundreds and again some hack Sudip Chetterjee from Bengal can also score hundreds. But we know who is the right choice for next Indian National Team. 

You should choose the best ones. And for that the selectors regional and national should be very patient and caring. 

Is sudip chatterjee that bad??

[Anik Krishna]

No. No. I was just saying that Sudip and Iyer both scored well in the recent Ranji Trophy. Iyer was well known before the Tournament. He scored well this time. Again Sudip who didn't get chance in Ipls also scored few 100s in the tournament. Both are talented. I was just saying Sudip was less familiar. 

Here you can met with lots of players with different capabilities. Some unknowns (comparatively) might go zero to hero. Sudip was also just another player. But now he's the face of Bengal State team. 

This what I meant. Not  'Name' the performance and atitude should be priority in the Seletors table. Talent is useless if its not hardly used. 

[rkt.india]

Yeah. R8. But you must find the genuine talents though. Some are born to be domestic bully. Many score hundred. But all are not genuine talent neither ready for International stage. There are talented guys like Shreyas Iyer from Mumbai who can score hundreds and again some hack Sudip Chetterjee from Bengal can also score hundreds. But we know who is the right choice for next Indian National Team. 

You should choose the best ones. And for that the selectors regional and national should be very patient and caring. 

Sudip Chatterjee isnt a hack. He has tackled difficult conditions when others falling like 9 pins. He is a young batsman who has been talked about very highly in bengal.

[rkt.india]

No. No. I was just saying that Sudip and Iyer both scored well in the recent Ranji Trophy. Iyer was well known before the Tournament. He scored well this time. Again Sudip who didn't get chance in Ipls also scored few 100s in the tournament. Both are talented. I was just saying Sudip was less familiar. 

Here you can met with lots of players with different capabilities. Some unknowns (comparatively) might go zero to hero. Sudip was also just another player. But now he's the face of Bengal State team. 

This what I meant. Not  'Name' the performance and atitude should be priority in the Seletors table. Talent is useless if its not hardly used. 

both are different type of players. Iyer is more flamboyant while Sudip is more traditional. He plays long and lot of balls. He might have played more deliveries than Iyer this season.

[express bowling]

Sudip Chatterjee isnt a hack. He has tackled difficult conditions when others falling like 9 pins. He is a young batsman who has been talked about very highly in bengal.

I am hearing good things about Sudip too. Like you said...he has played well when the chips are down.

Edited November 24, 2015 by express bowling

[gakgupta]

I am hearing good things about Sudip too. Like you said...he has played well when the chips are down.

I always respect a guy who plays when chips are down.....Steve Waugh used to do that on consistent basis for Australia.....these kind of innings makes a playesr special.....if he is any good, I would like him to graduate to next level.

But Bengal was never a good batting team.....we have seen SAHA scored lots of runs when chips were down but he is not a special talent by any means

[fineleg]

Some fast tracking of Shreyas Iyer maybe warranted. Otherwise we will just wait till he loses his red hot form, and then pick him when he is out of form. Atleast get him in for the next series we play.

[shibnarayan]

I am hearing good things about Sudip too. Like you said...he has played well when the chips are down.

abhimanyu easwaran is the most promising Batsman from Bengal.

[gakgupta]

abhimanyu easwaran is the most promising Batsman from Bengal.

He got a good 80 in the last match where every one else couldn't even pass 50

[amiret]

Nope.

We can't even take most of the international centuries scored by Indian FTB's in India seriously .

Edited November 25, 2015 by amiret