manoj_admlab Posted December 25, 2007 Posted December 25, 2007 Spinner left out on MCG green top for fast youngster http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22971910-2882,00.html
Laaloo Posted December 25, 2007 Posted December 25, 2007 :finger::finger: PONTING :two_thumbs_up::two_thumbs_up::two_thumbs_up::two_thumbs_up:
zubinpepsi Posted December 25, 2007 Posted December 25, 2007 hope Ishant does justice to his selection...
siddhu Posted December 25, 2007 Posted December 25, 2007 :finger::finger: PONTING :two_thumbs_up::two_thumbs_up::two_thumbs_up::two_thumbs_up: thats exactly what i am afraid off. Bhajji is must to nullify ponting...
Laaloo Posted December 25, 2007 Posted December 25, 2007 ^^ Ricky Ponting (!?) feels Ishant Sharma will not play! But Kumble is keeping options open between IS and HS.
fineleg Posted December 25, 2007 Posted December 25, 2007 thats exactly what i am afraid off. Bhajji is must to nullify ponting... Bhajji aint nullifying nobody. Ponting will take HS to cleaners at MCG if he plays.
Cricketics Posted December 25, 2007 Posted December 25, 2007 so pathan is not playing.. i thought our pace attack would be - pathan, zaheer and r.p anwayz, hope Ishant does something good for India come on ISHANT SHARMA
Chaos Posted December 25, 2007 Posted December 25, 2007 its a shame that ponting is torturing poor bowling attacks like this.
fineleg Posted December 25, 2007 Posted December 25, 2007 why is pathan not playing I wish Irfan Pathan plays instead of Ishant Sharma. All left armers is a drawback. But still, IKP should play. He has the experience. A rookie like Ishant Sharma against Aus is a very very risky move.
guju24 Posted December 25, 2007 Posted December 25, 2007 seems like condition might support ishant...bez of his height chances for good bounce and good pace...it will be good contest for him...good luck ISHANT
ludhianvi Posted December 25, 2007 Posted December 25, 2007 they opted for a right hander its seems. All pace attack of lefties prolly went against pathan. But we do weaken our batting without pathan.
chamatkar Posted December 25, 2007 Posted December 25, 2007 they opted for a right hander its seems. All pace attack of lefties prolly went against pathan. But we do weaken our batting without pathan. Yaar, it's not so bad right now, that we have to rely on Pathan to "strengthen" our batting. I'm supportive of IS instead of HS.. Aussie pitches are rarely two spinner (forgive me Kumble for calling you one) pitches.
HouMac Posted December 25, 2007 Posted December 25, 2007 Another good decision. Harbhajan stopped being a Test level bowler a long time ago. Might as well go with the inexperienced but promising Ishant!
flamy Posted December 26, 2007 Posted December 26, 2007 is the 12th man allowed to bowl nowadays? :hatsoff:
Chaos Posted December 26, 2007 Posted December 26, 2007 is the 12th man allowed to bowl nowadays? :hatsoff: i hope so :(, so we can send bhajji in for a rest.
Laaloo Posted December 26, 2007 Posted December 26, 2007 according to shastri They would have been tempted to go in with the extra seamer, but I thought they did the right thing by going in with their four best bowlers who could take 20 wickets. harbhajan is our 4th best bowler even ahead of pathan :-S
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now