Adi_91 Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 8 minutes ago, Texan said: He should nt have retired but he should have tried to be more aggressive and hit boundaries. As it is, run rate required was high. Yuvraj was struggling to run. Batsman like Dhoni waiting in the wings. The most sensible thing to do would have been to try and fearlessly play some aggressive shots. Too bad he didnt do that. That we won because Kohli kept his calm is a different matter altogether. But as the article rightly pointed out,we would have lost if he would have stayed for a few more overs. Tbh, both Kohli and Yuvi were struggling to go over a run a ball. Yuvi in fact was going just over run a ball. I think he made 19 off 16 which is not all that bad, considering even the in form Kohli was struggling to time the ball then. Link to comment
Ranjha Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 4 hours ago, Texan said: He should nt have retired but he should have tried to be more aggressive and hit boundaries. As it is, run rate required was high. Yuvraj was struggling to run. Batsman like Dhoni waiting in the wings. The most sensible thing to do would have been to try and fearlessly play some aggressive shots. Too bad he didnt do that. That we won because Kohli kept his calm is a different matter altogether. But as the article rightly pointed out,we would have lost if he would have stayed for a few more overs. They in the middle decided when it was time to go all out for Yuvraj..had he tried to go big right after raina wicket and not build a partnership, India would have been in much bigger trouble. Under_Score 1 Link to comment
Silva Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 (edited) the Writer is using very strange logic.Its like saying that Dhoni would have won the 2011 world cup final faster if kohli got out earlier. Anybody can look at a score sheet and say that quicker that dhoni got in the easier India would have won. But India would have had less wickets in hand with 110+ runs to get rather than 70. Im not saying that Yuvi played a great or even a good innings but not sure how people can say for certain India would have won more easily if at all if he got out earlier. Edited March 29, 2016 by Silva kosingh, Under_Score and kruiser 3 Link to comment
moniker Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 Kohli is always very supportive of his teammates. Even as captain I haven't seen him criticize any cricketer in public. His comments on Yuvraj's innings don't hold much water. He probably does this to maintain a positive vibe in the team. I'd buy the approach of building a partnership if Yuvraj wasn't injured. He neither could run between the wickets nor go for his shots. I don't get what kind of an innings could be built with that kind of an approach, that too in a T20. If you can't run you either have to go for your shots or retire hurt. You can come back later if the need arises. Not running denied not only his runs but Virat's as well. I wouldn't go as far as to say he was selfish but that was a really poor strategy. Link to comment
beetle Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 22 hours ago, Ranjha said: Listen to what Virat said.. Virat was just being sweet and diplomatic .He was looking frustrated while uv was refusing the second runs. Ultimate_Game 1 Link to comment
Ultimate_Game Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 29 minutes ago, radhika said: Virat was just being sweet and diplomatic .He was looking frustrated while uv was refusing the second runs. This! I'm sure Virat & company had great things to say about Yuvraj's struggles in WT20 2014 final as well. Link to comment
rkt.india Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 3 hours ago, Silva said: the Writer is using very strange logic.Its like saying that Dhoni would have won the 2011 world cup final faster if kohli got out earlier. Anybody can look at a score sheet and say that quicker that dhoni got in the easier India would have won. But India would have had less wickets in hand with 110+ runs to get rather than 70. Im not saying that Yuvi played a great or even a good innings but not sure how people can say for certain India would have won more easily if at all if he got out earlier. Yuvraj would still have been not out if he had retired. So, we would still have had wickets intact. Link to comment
Ranjha Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 4 hours ago, Silva said: the Writer is using very strange logic.Its like saying that Dhoni would have won the 2011 world cup final faster if kohli got out earlier. Anybody can look at a score sheet and say that quicker that dhoni got in the easier India would have won. But India would have had less wickets in hand with 110+ runs to get rather than 70. Im not saying that Yuvi played a great or even a good innings but not sure how people can say for certain India would have won more easily if at all if he got out earlier. Exactly my point. Under_Score 1 Link to comment
Ranjha Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 53 minutes ago, rkt.india said: Yuvraj would still have been not out if he had retired. So, we would still have had wickets intact. Yes but only technically. Dhoni coming that early is a big risk..Had he got out at that time, who would do the finisher role he is most renowned for? He wouldn't be able to play that freely. Under_Score 1 Link to comment
Ranjha Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 1 hour ago, Ultimate_Game said: This! I'm sure Virat & company had great things to say about Yuvraj's struggles in WT20 2014 final as well. Here we go again...Yuvraj 2014 t20 final has nothing to do with this innings. This innings was helpful for team India. Under_Score 1 Link to comment
Ranjha Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 The author of this article got trolled big time..Read the comments on his article..95% feel Yuvraj played a decent innings and was needed. Under_Score 1 Link to comment
zen Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 Ind is 54 for 3 in 8.2 overs .... Which means that Ind has to get 107 from the next 11.4 overs .... RRR = 9 to 10 Kohli is actually the one well equipped to bat till the end so he is one who should be taking less risk and scoring singles to put the guy at the other end on strike to go after the bowling to bring the RRR down esp. with 6 more wkts in hand Yuvraj Singh gets out on the last ball of the 14th over. Ind is 94 .... RRR = 13.4 .... Ind needed an 18 ball 35-40 from him Link to comment
Ultimate_Game Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 4 hours ago, Ranjha said: Here we go again...Yuvraj 2014 t20 final has nothing to do with this innings. This innings was helpful for team India. Yeah the innings was helpful in the sense he go out at the right time. Thank you Shane Watson for taking that catch else Aus would be in the semis. Under_Score 1 Link to comment
Ranjha Posted March 30, 2016 Share Posted March 30, 2016 (edited) Finally you admit he got out at the right time..Had he got out earlier, it could have well been over for India if no one from the other end was able to form a partnership....he is performing much better than robot, dhawan and Raina and his spot is not under the scanner except for a couple of icf posters...lol Edited March 30, 2016 by Ranjha Under_Score 1 Link to comment
Ultimate_Game Posted March 30, 2016 Share Posted March 30, 2016 18 minutes ago, Ranjha said: Finally you admit he got out at the right time..Had he got out earlier, it could have well been over for India if no one from the other end was able to form a partnership....he is performing much better than robot, dhawan and Raina and his spot is not under the scanner except for a couple of icf posters...lol Couple of posters! Set up a poll how many would support Pandey over Yuvraj and you will see it for yourself. Yuvraj is simply too old and unfit to play at this level and that's been the case for 5 years now. StriKe and Under_Score 1 1 Link to comment
Ranjha Posted March 30, 2016 Share Posted March 30, 2016 6 hours ago, Ultimate_Game said: Couple of posters! Set up a poll how many would support Pandey over Yuvraj and you will see it for yourself. Yuvraj is simply too old and unfit to play at this level and that's been the case for 5 years now. This forum is not a reflection of entire Indian cricket fans. Set up the poll if it makes you happy...like I said look elsewhere too for eg first post article 95% of ppl supported Yuvraj in comments..what you go to say about that? Link to comment
Ranjha Posted March 30, 2016 Share Posted March 30, 2016 6 hours ago, Ultimate_Game said: Couple of posters! Set up a poll how many would support Pandey over Yuvraj and you will see it for yourself. Yuvraj is simply too old and unfit to play at this level and that's been the case for 5 years now. I don't see anyone going on and on against Yuvraj other than rett and you.it seems he kidnapped your sister or something... Link to comment
zen Posted March 30, 2016 Share Posted March 30, 2016 (edited) 9 hours ago, Ranjha said: I don't see anyone going on and on against Yuvraj other than rett and you.it seems he kidnapped your sister or something... I have been following cricket extensively since 90s and have been asking for all those who are past their best to be not picked (or retire) including Kapil and Tendulkar .... I follow Ind cricket and not players It is not hard to see that Yuvi, Raina, etc. are struggling. Yuvi's injury gives Ind an opportunity to at least make one change All you have been doing is trying to justify Yuvi on basis of points such as others did much worse (when that is not being debated as doing relatively bad is nothing to take pride in and at the point only Yuvi is injured. Are we discussing which one of the 2-3 injured players should be replaced?) Edited March 30, 2016 by rett Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now