mishra Posted May 5, 2016 Posted May 5, 2016 Headingley test starts on May 19. Cook will be 31 years and 5 months. And he will just surpass Sachins record of youngest ever to make 10000. All he needs is to score 36 runs against Sri Lanka. This guy may take top spot in most number of tests runs scored in International arena by end of his career. tweaker 1
rkt.india Posted May 5, 2016 Posted May 5, 2016 yes and England play a lot of test matches. MechEng 1
Vilander Posted May 5, 2016 Posted May 5, 2016 How many matches. In cricket youngest means nothing. It should be how many matches/innings.
bulbul Posted May 5, 2016 Posted May 5, 2016 How many matches. In cricket youngest means nothing. It should be how many matches/innings. Youngest means youngest
MechEng Posted May 6, 2016 Posted May 6, 2016 (edited) If Cook plays till he's 37, he will probably end up playing 210 tests. In the next 10 years, Cook might be the highest run getter and Anderson highest wicket taker for a fast bowler breaking Mcgrath's record. Number of tests played by England per year is between 13-16, way too much. Edited May 6, 2016 by MechEng tweaker 1
rkt.india Posted May 6, 2016 Posted May 6, 2016 55 minutes ago, MechEng said: If Cook plays till he's 37, he will probably end up playing 210 tests. In the next 10 years, Cook might be the highest run getter and Anderson highest wicket taker for a fast bowler breaking Mcgrath's record. Number of tests played by England per year is between 13-16, way too much. Anderson is close to 34. dont see him play 3 more years. tweaker 1
Shoonya Posted May 6, 2016 Posted May 6, 2016 One more dip in form like he had in 2013 and 2014 and he will be out of the team with Root snapping at his heels. 34-35 is the age at which most English Test batsmen have retired recently. Stewart was the last English batsman to play beyond 35. Can't see him going beyond 13-14000 runs. tweaker 1
kruiser Posted May 6, 2016 Posted May 6, 2016 look at his average if you want to look at numbers.. that will tell the story. Definitely Cook >> SRT... if you are hungry fro some Fish n Chips Vilander 1
HippoSucks Posted May 8, 2016 Posted May 8, 2016 England plays a lot of tests and Cook doesn't have any workload from other formats. It is still a great achievement and you need to be very fit to play so many matches. tweaker 1
mishra Posted May 10, 2016 Author Posted May 10, 2016 On 06/05/2016 at 3:27 PM, kruiser said: look at his average if you want to look at numbers.. that will tell the story. Definitely Cook >> SRT... if you are hungry fro some Fish n Chips Numbers of any batsmen in modern era doesn't bode well in English conditions. I am not comparing him to SRT but what it means is he is well above all if not most of Rockstars and cricketers in test arena. So debate is whether he is greatest among players like Amala, Kohli, Root, Williamson, Smith? tweaker 1
bulbul Posted May 10, 2016 Posted May 10, 2016 6 minutes ago, Precambrian said: When's SA touring England again? I doubt current SA touring England will make any difference to Cook's batting...
rkt.india Posted May 11, 2016 Posted May 11, 2016 10 hours ago, Precambrian said: When's SA touring England again? They will prepare dry pitches like last time.
Chandan Posted May 11, 2016 Posted May 11, 2016 16 hours ago, mishra said: So debate is whether he is greatest among players like Amala, Kohli, Root, Williamson, Smith? Amla, Root, way way WAAAYYYY better Cook. Smith, Williamson and Kohli too catching up. But why would you compare an opener with MO batsmen? Different breeds, no? In tests?
Chandan Posted May 11, 2016 Posted May 11, 2016 7 hours ago, MultiB48 said: root will end up on top Top of what? Total no of runs in tests? Total no of tons in tests? Or something else? Please be clear.
mishra Posted May 13, 2016 Author Posted May 13, 2016 On 11/05/2016 at 7:06 AM, Chandan said: Amla, Root, way way WAAAYYYY better Cook. Smith, Williamson and Kohli too catching up. But why would you compare an opener with MO batsmen? Different breeds, no? In tests? Are you serious? Just because he plays a different brand of cricket which doest involve playing with a base ball bat means he is inferior then most. he has scored greater number of runs, at similar or better average in arguably equally or more difficult conditions. Also what makes you say batting in middle order is tougher. If anything, Its easier as new ball isnt there. So a opener in tests is generally a better or equally good batsman
HippoSucks Posted May 14, 2016 Posted May 14, 2016 On 5/11/2016 at 2:06 AM, Chandan said: Amla, Root, way way WAAAYYYY better Cook. Smith, Williamson and Kohli too catching up. But why would you compare an opener with MO batsmen? Different breeds, no? In tests? Root is not close to Cook as a batsman so far. Amla is better though.
gakgupta Posted May 14, 2016 Posted May 14, 2016 For me cricket is entertainment and in that aspect cook is so boring Root is really good..... SR could be same for both but the class oozed out by root will make u root to the TV set Sent from my XT1068 using Tapatalk
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now